Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Crohns Colitis. 2019 Aug 14;13(8):976-981. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz018.
Therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] has proven to be effective for optimising anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Nevertheless, the majority of data refer to infliximab and reactive testing or association studies. We aimed to compare the long-term outcome of patients with IBD who received at least one proactive TDM of adalimumab, with standard of care, defined as empirical dose escalation and/or reactive TDM.
This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Patients on maintenance adalimumab therapy from June 2006 to December 2015 were eligible. We analysed time to treatment failure from start of adalimumab until the end of follow-up [July 2016]. Treatment failure was defined as drug discontinuation for secondary loss of response or serious adverse event or need for IBD-related surgery. Serum adalimumab concentrations and antibodies to adalimumab were measured using the Prometheus homogeneous mobility shift assay.
A total of 382 patients with IBD [Crohn's disease, n = 311, 81%] were included and received either at least one proactive TDM [n = 53] or standard of care [empirical dose escalation, n = 279; reactive TDM, n = 50]. Patients were followed for a median of 3.1 years [interquartile range, 1.4-4.8 years]. Multiple Cox regression analyses showed that at least one proactive TDM was independently associated with a reduced risk for treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-0.9; p = 0.022).
This multicentre, retrospective cohort study reflecting real-life clinical practice provides the first evidence that proactive TDM of adalimumab may be associated with a lower risk of treatment failure compared with standard of care in patients with IBD.
治疗药物监测(TDM)已被证明可有效优化炎症性肠病(IBD)中的抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗。然而,大多数数据都与英夫利昔单抗有关,涉及反应性检测或相关性研究。我们旨在比较接受至少一次阿达木单抗主动 TDM 的 IBD 患者与标准治疗(定义为经验性剂量递增和/或反应性 TDM)的长期结果。
这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究。2006 年 6 月至 2015 年 12 月期间接受维持阿达木单抗治疗的患者符合条件。我们分析了从开始接受阿达木单抗治疗到随访结束(2016 年 7 月)的治疗失败时间。治疗失败定义为因继发应答丧失或严重不良事件或需要 IBD 相关手术而停止药物治疗。使用 Prometheus 均相迁移率测定法测量血清阿达木单抗浓度和阿达木单抗抗体。
共纳入 382 例 IBD 患者[克罗恩病,n = 311,81%],其中至少接受过一次主动 TDM [n = 53]或标准治疗[经验性剂量递增,n = 279;反应性 TDM,n = 50]。患者中位随访时间为 3.1 年[四分位间距,1.4-4.8 年]。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,至少一次主动 TDM 与治疗失败风险降低独立相关(风险比[HR]:0.4;95%置信区间[CI]:0.2-0.9;p = 0.022)。
这项多中心、回顾性队列研究反映了真实临床实践,首次提供了证据表明,与 IBD 患者的标准治疗相比,阿达木单抗的主动 TDM 可能与治疗失败风险降低相关。