Suppr超能文献

2019冠状病毒病门诊患者与住院患者恢复期血浆治疗:疗效及血栓栓塞风险

Convalescent plasma therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients: Efficacy and risk of thromboembolism.

作者信息

Li Pei Ye, Yu Philip, Li Allen, Khalid Faran, Laureano Marissa Liselle, Crowther Mark Andrew

机构信息

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Feb;7(2):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100068. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although early evidence concluded a lack of clinical benefit of convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) in COVID-19 management, recent trials have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of CPT in ambulatory care. CPT may also potentiate thromboembolic events, given the presence of coagulation factors and the prothrombotic state of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to assess and compare the clinical efficacy and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE)/arterial thromboembolism (ATE) of CPT in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from December 2019 to December 2022 for randomized controlled trials that investigated the use of CPT against placebo or standard of care in adult patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome was nonmortality disease progression. Secondary outcomes include VTE, ATE, 28-day mortality, clinical improvement, length of hospitalization, sepsis/fever, and major adverse cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized controlled trials, with 21,340 patients, were included. CPT significantly reduced nonmortality disease progression in ambulatory patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92;  = .009) but not in hospitalized patients (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.12;  = .58). The risk of VTE and ATE did not differ between the CPT and the control group (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.82-1.66;  = .40; and OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.37-2.79;  = .98, respectively). No conclusive differences between CPT and control groups were noted in 28-day mortality, clinical improvement, length of hospitalization, risk of sepsis/fever, and major adverse cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, treatment of COVID-19 with CPT prevents the progression of COVID-19 in the ambulatory care. It is not associated with an increased risk of VTE, ATE, or other adverse events.

摘要

背景

尽管早期证据表明康复期血浆疗法(CPT)在COVID-19治疗中缺乏临床益处,但最近的试验已证明CPT在门诊治疗中的治疗潜力。鉴于COVID-19存在凝血因子和血栓前状态,CPT也可能会增加血栓栓塞事件的发生风险。

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较CPT在门诊和住院COVID-19患者中的临床疗效以及静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)/动脉血栓栓塞(ATE)的风险。

方法

检索了2019年12月至2022年12月期间的MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL,以查找调查CPT用于治疗成年COVID-19患者时与安慰剂或标准治疗相比疗效的随机对照试验。主要结局为非死亡疾病进展。次要结局包括VTE、ATE、28天死亡率、临床改善情况、住院时间、脓毒症/发热以及主要不良心血管事件。

结果

纳入了20项随机对照试验,共21340例患者。CPT显著降低了门诊患者的非死亡疾病进展(优势比[OR]为0.72;95%置信区间为0.56 - 0.92;P = 0.009),但在住院患者中未显示出显著效果(OR为1.03;95%置信区间为0.94 - 1.12;P = 0.58)。CPT组和对照组之间VTE和ATE的风险没有差异(OR分别为1.16;95%置信区间为0.82 - 1.66;P = 0.40和OR为1.01;95%置信区间为0.37 - 2.79;P = 0.98)。在28天死亡率、临床改善情况、住院时间、脓毒症/发热风险以及主要不良心血管事件方面,CPT组和对照组之间未发现确凿差异。

结论

总之,CPT治疗COVID-19可防止门诊治疗中COVID-19的进展,且与VTE、ATE或其他不良事件风险增加无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b333/10009525/7e64eef25d94/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验