Miles Matthew, Peña-Sánchez Juan Nicolás, Heisler Courtney, Cui Yunsong, Mathias Holly, Stewart Michael, Jones Jennifer L
Division of Digestive Care and Endoscopy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Crohns Colitis 360. 2022 Nov 30;4(4):otac046. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otac046. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Collaborative care models improve inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient outcomes, yet little is known about the capacity or available resources to deliver such model of care in Canada. We aimed to describe the structure and process characteristics of clinical care delivery models for IBD across Canada, including the number of collaborative care centers.
A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2017 and October 2018 through an online survey. This survey was distributed to gastroenterologists at community and academic centers across Canada who provide care for IBD patients. Comparisons between collaborative and non-collaborative centers were analyzed using chi-squares or -tests. Descriptive statistics of respondent demographics were also generated.
Seventy-two gastroenterologists from 62 unique IBD centers completed the survey. A total of 7 unique collaborative centers and 55 unique non-collaborative centers were identified. There were significant differences between collaborative and non-collaborative centers in some aspects of access to IBD care, patient assessment and referral process, and patent education and empowerment. Notably, very few centers had processes for implementing and evaluating evidence-based clinical pathways, and auditing quality indicators.
Our findings identify areas for improving the quality of IBD care in Canada. Expanding the number of and access to collaborative care centers in Canada is needed, in addition to increased focus on patient education, communication, and implementation of evidence-based care pathways.
协作护理模式可改善炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的治疗效果,但对于在加拿大提供这种护理模式的能力或可用资源知之甚少。我们旨在描述加拿大各地IBD临床护理提供模式的结构和过程特征,包括协作护理中心的数量。
2017年11月至2018年10月期间通过在线调查进行了一项横断面研究。该调查分发给加拿大各地社区和学术中心为IBD患者提供护理的胃肠病学家。使用卡方检验或t检验分析协作中心和非协作中心之间的差异。还生成了受访者人口统计学的描述性统计数据。
来自62个独特IBD中心的72名胃肠病学家完成了调查。共确定了7个独特的协作中心和55个独特的非协作中心。协作中心和非协作中心在IBD护理的可及性、患者评估和转诊过程以及患者教育和赋权的某些方面存在显著差异。值得注意的是,很少有中心有实施和评估循证临床路径以及审核质量指标的流程。
我们的研究结果确定了加拿大改善IBD护理质量的领域。除了更加关注患者教育、沟通和循证护理路径的实施外,还需要增加加拿大协作护理中心的数量并提高其可及性。