Suppr超能文献

定义加拿大炎症性肠病最佳实践管理的质量指标。

Defining quality indicators for best-practice management of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May;28(5):275-85. doi: 10.1155/2014/941245.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of published data regarding the quality of care of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Canada. Clinical quality indicators are quantitative end points used to guide, monitor and improve the quality of patient care. In Canada, where universal health care can vary significantly among provinces, quality indicators can be used to identify potential gaps in the delivery of IBD care and standardize the approach to interprovincial management.

METHODS

The Emerging Practice in IBD Collaborative (EPIC) group generated a shortlist of IBD quality indicators based on a comprehensive literature review. An iterative voting process was used to select quality indicators to take forward. In a face-to-face meeting with the EPIC group, available evidence to support each quality indicator was presented by the EPIC member aligned to it, followed by group discussion to agree on the wording of the statements. The selected quality indicators were then ratified in a final vote by all EPIC members.

RESULTS

Eleven quality indicators for the management of IBD within the single-payer health care system of Canada were developed. These focus on accurate diagnosis, appropriate and timely management, disease monitoring, and prevention or treatment of complications of IBD or its therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These quality indicators are measurable, reflective of the evidence base and expert opinion, and define a standard of care that is at least a minimum that should be expected for IBD management in Canada. The next steps for the EPIC group involve conducting research to assess current practice across Canada as it pertains to these quality indicators and to measure the impact of each of these indicators on patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

关于加拿大炎症性肠病(IBD)护理质量的已发表数据较少。临床质量指标是用于指导、监测和改善患者护理质量的定量终点。在加拿大,全民医疗保健在各省之间差异很大,质量指标可用于识别 IBD 护理提供方面的潜在差距,并使省际管理方法标准化。

方法

新兴炎症性肠病协作组(EPIC)根据全面文献复习生成了 IBD 质量指标的候选清单。使用迭代投票过程选择要推进的质量指标。在与 EPIC 小组的面对面会议上,与 EPIC 成员相对应的成员提出了支持每个质量指标的现有证据,随后进行小组讨论,就陈述的措辞达成一致。然后,所有 EPIC 成员通过最终投票对选定的质量指标进行了认可。

结果

为加拿大单一支付者医疗保健系统制定了 11 项 IBD 管理质量指标。这些指标侧重于准确诊断、适当和及时的管理、疾病监测以及预防或治疗 IBD 或其治疗的并发症。

结论

这些质量指标是可衡量的,反映了证据基础和专家意见,并定义了至少应该期望在加拿大进行 IBD 管理的护理标准。EPIC 小组的下一步行动包括开展研究,评估加拿大目前在这些质量指标方面的实践情况,并衡量每个指标对患者结局的影响。

相似文献

2
[Quality of care in inflammatory bowel disease].[炎症性肠病的医疗质量]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;65(3):139-44. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2015.65.3.139.
4
Implementing quality measures for inflammatory bowel disease.实施炎症性肠病的质量措施。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015 Apr;17(4):14. doi: 10.1007/s11894-015-0437-1.
7
Quality of Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病患者的医疗质量
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 Feb 21;25(3):479-489. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy276.
9
Development of a Global Rating Scale for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病全球评分量表的制定。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 11;3(1):4-16. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz017. eCollection 2020 Feb.

引用本文的文献

2
Consensus quality indicators for monitoring multiple sclerosis.监测多发性硬化症的共识质量指标。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Mar 29;40:100891. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100891. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Patient-Centered Access to IBD Care: A Qualitative Study.以患者为中心的炎症性肠病护理途径:一项定性研究。
Crohns Colitis 360. 2022 Nov 29;5(1):otac045. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otac045. eCollection 2023 Jan.

本文引用的文献

2
Endoscopy reporting standards.内镜检查报告标准。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(5):286-92. doi: 10.1155/2013/145894.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验