Suppr超能文献

在清醒纤维支气管镜插管过程中,使用氧气吹入与吸引清除分泌物的安全性及操作便利性比较。

Safety and ease of awake fiberoptic intubation with use of oxygen insufflation versus suction to clear secretions during procedure.

作者信息

Rajan Sunil, Tosh Pulak, Babu Sruthi C, Kumar Lakshmi

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct-Dec;38(4):628-634. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_27_21. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

During awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI), clearing secretions is usually done by suctioning. The study objectives were to assess the safety of AFOI with the use of oxygen insufflation versus suction to clear secretions from the field of vision during the procedure as assessed by incidence of desaturation <95%, ease of intubation, and time taken to secure the airway.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective randomized study was conducted in 40 adult patients with difficult airways requiring AFOI. All patients received dexmedetomidine 0.5mcg/kg intravenously, and the airway was topicalized. In Group-S suction and in Group-O oxygen was connected to the suction port of the bronchoscope to clear the secretions by activating the suction knob during bronchoscopy. Ease of intubation was scored as easy, moderate, and hard.

RESULTS

Incidence of desaturation to <95% and the need for oxygen supplementation were significantly high in Group S compared to Group O (60% vs. 10%). Incidence of easy intubation (80% vs. 75%) and time taken to intubate (50.1 ± 16.6 vs. 53.8 ± 21.0 s) were comparable. The number of times (median) suctioning was done in Group S was significantly high compared to the number of oxygen insufflations required in Group O [3 (1-6) vs. 2 (0-5), 0.033]. Desaturation to <95% was significantly low in Group O compared to Group S during bronchoscopy (10% vs. 60%, 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The use of oxygen insufflation to clear secretions from the field of vision during AFOI is a safer alternative to suctioning as this technique reduces the chance of desaturation during the procedure without affecting ease of intubation, number of attempts, time taken for it, or patient comfort.

摘要

背景与目的

在清醒纤维支气管镜引导插管(AFOI)过程中,通常通过吸引来清除分泌物。本研究的目的是通过低于95%的血氧饱和度发生率、插管的难易程度以及确保气道安全所需的时间,评估在AFOI过程中使用吹氧与吸引来清除视野中分泌物的安全性。

材料与方法

本前瞻性随机研究纳入了40例需要进行AFOI的成年困难气道患者。所有患者均静脉注射右美托咪定0.5μg/kg,并对气道进行表面麻醉。S组采用吸引,O组将氧气连接到支气管镜的吸引端口,在支气管镜检查期间通过启动吸引旋钮来清除分泌物。插管的难易程度分为容易、中等和困难。

结果

与O组相比,S组血氧饱和度降至<95%的发生率及补充氧气的需求显著更高(60%对10%)。容易插管的发生率(80%对75%)及插管所需时间(50.1±16.6秒对53.8±21.0秒)相当。S组的吸引次数(中位数)显著高于O组所需的吹氧次数[3(1 - 6)对2(0 - 5),P = 0.033]。在支气管镜检查期间,O组血氧饱和度降至<95%的发生率显著低于S组(10%对60%,P = 0.002)。

结论

在AFOI过程中,使用吹氧来清除视野中的分泌物是一种比吸引更安全的方法,因为该技术可降低操作过程中血氧饱和度降低的几率,且不影响插管的难易程度、尝试次数、所需时间或患者舒适度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e99a/9912867/4c526b897388/JOACP-38-628-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验