Raithatha Harsh, Patil Vishal S, Pai Mukund, Shah Shail
Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, IND.
Orthopaedic Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Jan 9;15(1):e33570. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33570. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Introduction Proximal humerus fractures account for approximately 4%-5% of all fractures. It accounts for approximately 45% of all humeral fractures. Proximal humerus fractures which are mostly stable or minimally displaced fractures are usually managed non-operatively with good outcomes. Displaced or unstable fractures may require reduction and stabilization. For proximal humerus fractures, conservative treatments often result in stiffness and malunion of the shoulder. In comminuted proximal humerus fractures the use of a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) only does not provide the required stable fixation which usually leads to complications such as varus collapse, malunion, anterior-posterior angulation, screw cutout, metal failure and nonunion and thus open reduction and internal fixation with dual plating are recommended for proximal humerus fractures. Material and methods The Institutional Ethics Committee of Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth in Pune approved this prospective study. We included a sample size of 52 patients and conducted a study on these patients who were admitted under the Orthopedics department at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Hospital, Pune. Results In this study, 52 patients were treated with dual plating for proximal humerus fracture, an additional plate is used along with PHILOS. In our study, the majority of the study population belonged to > 50 years (34.6%), followed by 41-50 years (26.9%), 31-40 years (23.1%), and 21-30 years (15.4%). The mean age of the patient was 53.7 years including 33 male and 19 female patients. The majority of the patient in the study included was with RTA 40 patients and 12 patients with a history of falls from height. The fracture was classified using Neers classification, Neer type 2 fracture (23.1%), Neer type 3 fracture (46.2%), and Neer type 4 fracture (30.7%). In the current study, the mean DASH score at Baseline was 58.88±6.29, at three months was 36.23±5.05 and at six months was 31.85±4.16. The mean DASH score decreased significantly from baseline to three months to 6 months. As per the Paavolainen method, it was good among 40 (76.9%) and fair among 10 (19.2%), and poor among two (3.8%) cases. Out of 52 patients, we found varus collapse in immediate postop x-ray in two patient and screw protrusion in the glenohumeral joint in one patient. Conclusion Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes were noted. This dual mechanism prevents varus displacement of the proximal fragment, and as a result, it provides a good functional outcome with dual plates in proximal humerus fractures.
引言
肱骨近端骨折约占所有骨折的4% - 5%。它占所有肱骨骨折的约45%。大多数为稳定或轻度移位的肱骨近端骨折通常采用非手术治疗,效果良好。移位或不稳定骨折可能需要复位和固定。对于肱骨近端骨折,保守治疗常导致肩部僵硬和畸形愈合。在肱骨近端粉碎性骨折中,仅使用肱骨近端锁定系统(PHILOS)不能提供所需的稳定固定,这通常会导致诸如内翻塌陷、畸形愈合、前后成角、螺钉穿出、金属失效和骨不连等并发症,因此对于肱骨近端骨折建议采用双钢板切开复位内固定。
材料与方法
位于浦那的迪帕克·帕蒂尔维迪佩特博士机构伦理委员会批准了这项前瞻性研究。我们纳入了52例患者样本,并对这些在浦那迪帕克·帕蒂尔医学院和医院骨科住院的患者进行了研究。
结果
在本研究中,52例肱骨近端骨折患者接受了双钢板治疗,即在使用PHILOS的同时额外使用一块钢板。在我们的研究中,大多数研究人群年龄>50岁(34.6%),其次是41 - 50岁(26.9%)、31 - 40岁(23.1%)和21 - 30岁(15.4%)。患者的平均年龄为53.7岁,其中男性33例,女性19例。研究中的大多数患者为交通事故伤(40例),12例有高处坠落史。骨折采用Neer分类法,Neer 2型骨折(23.1%)、Neer 3型骨折(46.2%)和Neer 4型骨折(30.7%)。在本研究中,基线时的平均DASH评分为58.88±6.29,三个月时为36.23±5.05,六个月时为31.85±4.16。从基线到三个月再到六个月,平均DASH评分显著下降。根据帕沃拉宁方法,40例(76.9%)为优,10例(19.2%)为良,2例(3.8%)为差。在52例患者中,我们发现术后即刻X线显示2例患者出现内翻塌陷,1例患者在肩关节出现螺钉突出。
结论
观察到了满意的临床和影像学结果。这种双重机制可防止近端骨折块的内翻移位,因此,双钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折可提供良好的功能结果。