International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Task Force on Global Lab Quality, Ottawa, Canada.
Division of Biochemistry, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Feb 13;61(8):1404-1410. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0057. Print 2023 Jul 26.
Clinical laboratory results are required for critical medical decisions, underscoring the importance of quality results. As part of total quality management, external quality assessment (EQA) is a vital component to ensure laboratory accuracy. The goal of this survey was to evaluate the current status of global laboratory quality systems and assess the need for implementation, expansion, or harmonization of EQA programs (EQAP) for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Task Force on Global Laboratory Quality (TF-GLQ) conducted a survey of IFCC full and affiliate members (n=110) on laboratory quality practice. A total of 41 (37.3%) countries representing all IFCC regions except North America provided responses about EQA availability and practices.
All 41 countries perform EQA, 38 reported that their laboratories had EQA policies and procedures, and 39 further act/evaluate unacceptable EQA results. 39 countries indicated they have international and/or national EQAP and 30 use alternative performance assessments. EQA frequency varied among countries. Generally, an EQAP provided the EQA materials (40/41) with four countries indicating that they did not have an EQAP in their country.
Globally, most laboratories participate in an EQAP and have defined quality procedures for EQA. There remain gaps in EQA material availability and implementation of EQA as a part of a total laboratory quality system. This survey highlights the need for education, training, and harmonization and will guide efforts of the IFCC TF-GLQ in identifying areas for enhancing global laboratory quality practices.
临床实验室结果是做出关键医疗决策的依据,凸显了结果质量的重要性。作为全面质量管理的一部分,外部质量评估(EQA)是确保实验室准确性的重要组成部分。本次调查的目的是评估全球实验室质量体系的现状,并评估实施、扩展或协调临床化学和实验室医学 EQAP 的必要性。
国际临床化学和实验室医学联合会(IFCC)全球实验室质量工作组(TF-GLQ)对 IFCC 正式成员和附属成员(n=110)进行了实验室质量实践调查。共有代表 IFCC 所有区域(北美除外)的 41 个国家/地区对 EQA 的可及性和实践情况做出了回应。
所有 41 个国家/地区都开展了 EQA,38 个国家/地区报告其实验室有 EQA 政策和程序,39 个国家/地区进一步采取行动/评估不可接受的 EQA 结果。39 个国家/地区表示它们拥有国际和/或国家 EQAP,30 个国家/地区使用替代绩效评估。各国的 EQA 频率存在差异。通常,EQAP 提供 EQA 材料(41 个国家中的 40 个),有四个国家表示其所在国家/地区没有 EQAP。
在全球范围内,大多数实验室都参与了 EQAP,并为 EQA 制定了明确的质量程序。在 EQA 材料的可用性以及将 EQA 作为全面实验室质量体系的一部分实施方面仍然存在差距。本次调查突出了教育、培训和协调的必要性,并将指导 IFCC TF-GLQ 努力确定加强全球实验室质量实践的领域。