International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Task Force on Global Lab Quality, Milan, Italy.
School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jun 19;61(12):2094-2101. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0492. Print 2023 Nov 27.
The trueness and precision of clinical laboratory results are ensured through total quality management systems (TQM), which primarily include internal quality control (IQC) practices. However, quality practices vary globally. To understand the current global state of IQC practice and IQC management in relation to TQM the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Task Force on Global Laboratory Quality (TF-GLQ) conducted a survey of IFCC member countries on IQC practices and management.
The survey included 16 questions regarding IQC and laboratory TQM practices and was distributed to IFCC full and affiliate member countries (n=110). A total of 46 (41.8 %) responses were received from all regions except North America.
Of the responding countries, 78.3 % (n=36) had legislative regulations or accreditation requirements governing medical laboratory quality standards. However, implementation was not mandatory in 46.7 % (n=21) of responding countries. IQC practices varied considerably with 57.1 % (n=28) of respondents indicating that they run 2 levels of IQC, 66.7 % (n=24) indicating they run IQC every 24 h and 66.7 % (n=28) using assay manufacturer IQC material sources. Only 29.3 % (n=12) of respondents indicated that every medical laboratory in their country has written IQC policies and procedures. By contrast, 97.6 % (n=40) of responding countries indicated they take corrective action and result remediation in the event of IQC failure.
The variability in TQM and IQC practices highlights the need for more formal programs and education to standardize and improve TQM in medical laboratories.
通过全面质量管理系统(TQM)确保临床实验室结果的准确性和精密度,其中主要包括内部质量控制(IQC)实践。然而,全球的质量实践存在差异。为了了解全球范围内 IQC 实践和与 TQM 相关的 IQC 管理的现状,国际临床化学和实验室医学联合会(IFCC)全球实验室质量工作组(TF-GLQ)对 IFCC 成员国的 IQC 实践和管理进行了调查。
该调查包括 16 个关于 IQC 和实验室 TQM 实践的问题,并分发给 IFCC 正式成员和准成员国家(n=110)。除北美外,所有地区共收到 46 份(41.8%)回复。
在做出回应的国家中,78.3%(n=36)有管理医疗实验室质量标准的立法规定或认证要求。然而,在做出回应的国家中,有 46.7%(n=21)并未强制执行。IQC 实践差异较大,57.1%(n=28)的受访者表示他们运行 2 个级别的 IQC,66.7%(n=24)表示他们每 24 小时运行 IQC,66.7%(n=28)使用检测试剂制造商的 IQC 材料来源。只有 29.3%(n=12)的受访者表示他们国家的每个医学实验室都有书面的 IQC 政策和程序。相比之下,97.6%(n=40)的回应国家表示,如果 IQC 失败,他们会采取纠正措施和结果补救措施。
TQM 和 IQC 实践的差异突出表明,需要更正式的计划和教育来规范和改进医学实验室的 TQM。