Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Jan;7(1):e26-e38. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230124-01. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
Although it is known that health literacy (HL) plays an explanatory role in educational inequalities in health, it is unknown whether this role varies across age groups.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the mediating role of HL in educational inequalities in four health outcomes varies across age groups: age 46 to 58 years, age 59 to 71 years, and age 72 to 84 years.
We used data from the Dutch Doetinchem Cohort Study, which included 3,448 participants. We included years of education as predictor, chronic illness prevalence and incidence, mental and self-perceived health as outcomes, and HL, based on self-report, as mediator. We used multiple-group mediation models to compare indirect effects across age groups.
In the complete sample without age stratification, HL partly mediated the effect of education on all health outcomes except for incidence of chronic diseases. These indirect effect estimates were larger for subjective (self-perceived health, proportion mediated [PM] = 37%, and mental health, = 37%) than for objective health outcomes (prevalence of chronic disease, = 17%). For the prevalence of chronic disease, the indirect effect estimate was significantly larger among individuals age 46 to 58 years compared to individuals age 59 to 71 years and for incidence of chronic disease also compared to individuals age 72 to 84 years. All other indirect effect estimates did not differ significantly between age groups. Using an alternative cut-off point for HL or adjusting for cognitive functioning did not meaningfully change the results.
Overall, we found that the explanatory role of HL in educational inequalities in mental and subjective health was stable but that it varied across age groups for chronic diseases, where it was largest among individuals age 46 to 58 years. Future studies may investigate the benefits of starting to intervene on HL from a younger age but means to improve HL may also benefit the subjective health of older adults with lower education. Plain Language Summary: This study examined age-group differences in the mediating role of HL in the relationship between education and health. Overall, we found that the explanatory role of HL in educational inequalities in mental and subjective health was stable but that it varied across age groups for chronic diseases, where it was largest among individuals age 46 to 58 years compared to individuals age 59 to 71 years and individuals age 72 to 84 years.
尽管已知健康素养(HL)在健康方面的教育不平等中起着解释作用,但尚不清楚这种作用是否因年龄组而异。
本研究旨在探讨 HL 在四个健康结果方面的教育不平等中的中介作用是否因年龄组而异:46 至 58 岁、59 至 71 岁和 72 至 84 岁。
我们使用了荷兰多廷赫姆队列研究的数据,该研究包括 3448 名参与者。我们将受教育年限作为预测因素,将慢性病的患病率和发病率、心理健康和自我感知健康作为结果,将基于自我报告的 HL 作为中介变量。我们使用多组中介模型来比较不同年龄组的间接效应。
在没有年龄分层的完整样本中,HL 部分解释了教育对所有健康结果的影响,除了慢性病的发病率。这些间接效应估计值在主观健康结果(自我感知健康,PM=37%;心理健康,37%)中比客观健康结果(慢性病患病率,17%)中更大。对于慢性病的患病率,46 至 58 岁的个体与 59 至 71 岁的个体以及慢性病发病率的个体与 72 至 84 岁的个体相比,间接效应估计值显著更大。所有其他间接效应估计值在年龄组之间没有显著差异。使用 HL 的替代截断值或调整认知功能并没有显著改变结果。
总的来说,我们发现 HL 在教育不平等与心理健康和主观健康之间的解释作用是稳定的,但在慢性病方面因年龄组而异,在 46 至 58 岁的个体中最大。未来的研究可能会研究从年轻时开始干预 HL 的益处,但提高 HL 的方法也可能有益于受教育程度较低的老年人群的主观健康。