• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改进个体差异的层次模型:戈德堡“本末倒置”方法的扩展

Improving hierarchical models of individual differences: An extension of Goldberg's bass-ackward method.

作者信息

Forbes Miriam K

机构信息

Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2024 Dec;29(6):1062-1073. doi: 10.1037/met0000546. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1037/met0000546
PMID:36780281
Abstract

Goldberg's (2006) bass-ackward approach to elucidating the hierarchical structure of individual differences data has been used widely to improve our understanding of the relationships among constructs of varying levels of granularity. The traditional approach has been to extract a single component or factor on the first level of the hierarchy, two on the second level, and so on, treating the correlations between adjoining levels akin to path coefficients in a hierarchical structure. This article proposes three modifications to the traditional approach with a particular focus on examining associations among levels of the hierarchy: (a) identify and remove redundant elements that perpetuate through multiple levels of the hierarchy; (b) (optionally) identify and remove artefactual elements; and (c) plot the strongest correlations among the remaining elements to identify their hierarchical associations. Together these steps can offer a simpler and more complete picture of the underlying hierarchical structure among a set of observed variables. The rationale for each step is described, illustrated in a hypothetical example and three basic simulations, and then applied in real data. The results are compared with the traditional bass-ackward approach together with agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis, and a basic tutorial with code is provided to apply the extended bass-ackward approach in other data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

戈德堡(2006年)提出的用于阐明个体差异数据层次结构的反向方法已被广泛应用,以增进我们对不同粒度水平构念之间关系的理解。传统方法是在层次结构的第一级提取一个单一成分或因素,在第二级提取两个,依此类推,将相邻级别之间的相关性视为层次结构中的路径系数。本文对传统方法提出了三点改进,特别关注层次结构各级别之间关联的考察:(a)识别并去除在层次结构的多个级别中持续存在的冗余元素;(b)(可选)识别并去除人为因素造成的元素;(c)绘制剩余元素之间最强的相关性,以确定它们的层次关联。这些步骤共同作用,可以为一组观测变量之间潜在的层次结构提供更简单、更完整的图景。文章描述了每个步骤的基本原理,通过一个假设示例和三个基本模拟进行说明,然后应用于实际数据。将结果与传统的反向方法以及凝聚层次聚类分析进行了比较,并提供了一个带有代码的基础教程,以便在其他数据中应用扩展后的反向方法。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Improving hierarchical models of individual differences: An extension of Goldberg's bass-ackward method.改进个体差异的层次模型:戈德堡“本末倒置”方法的扩展
Psychol Methods. 2024 Dec;29(6):1062-1073. doi: 10.1037/met0000546. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Mapping a hierarchical dimensional structure of high experiential permeability: A bass-ackward approach to linking positive schizotypy and openness to experience.绘制高度体验渗透性的层级维度结构:将积极的精神分裂症特质与经验开放性联系起来的反向方法。
Personal Disord. 2022 Nov;13(6):629-640. doi: 10.1037/per0000537. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
How Much Is Personality Structure Affected If One or More Highest-Level Factors Are First Removed? A Sequential Factors Approach.如果去除一个或多个最高层次因素,人格结构会受到多大影响?一种顺序因素法。
Pers Individ Dif. 2014 Nov 1;70:176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.047.
4
Examining the dimensions of schizotypy from the top down: A hierarchical comparison of item-level factor solutions.从自上而下审视精神分裂症特质的维度:项目水平因子解决方案的层级比较。
Personal Disord. 2018 Sep;9(5):467-477. doi: 10.1037/per0000283. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
5
Exploring the structure of fearlessness using self-report measures.运用自评量表探究无畏的结构。
J Pers. 2024 Apr;92(2):548-564. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12851. Epub 2023 May 30.
6
Hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modeling.分层贝叶斯连续时间动态建模。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):774-799. doi: 10.1037/met0000168. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
7
Deductive data mining.演绎式数据挖掘。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Dec;25(6):691-707. doi: 10.1037/met0000252. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
The joint hierarchical structure of psychopathology and dysfunctional personality domain indicators among community-dwelling adults.社区居住成年人中心理病理学与功能失调人格领域指标的联合层次结构。
Personal Ment Health. 2023 Feb;17(1):3-19. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1556. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
A comprehensive model framework for between-individual differences in longitudinal data.个体间差异的纵向数据综合模型框架。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Aug;29(4):748-766. doi: 10.1037/met0000585. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
10
The hierarchical structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (DAPP-BQ).人格障碍多维评定量表(DAPP-BQ)的层次结构。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Aug;25(4):504-16. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.504.

引用本文的文献

1
A Hierarchical Model of the Symptom-Level Structure of Psychopathology in Youth.青少年心理病理学症状水平结构的层次模型。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Mar;13(2):207-221. doi: 10.1177/21677026241257852. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
The hierarchical structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of externalizing symptoms in the adolescent brain and cognitive development study.青少年大脑与认知发展研究中外显症状的层次结构和纵向测量不变性
Personal Disord. 2025 Jan;16(1):18-30. doi: 10.1037/per0000692.
3
Examining the role of personality functioning in a hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology using two years of ambulatory assessed data.
使用两年的动态评估数据,在精神病理学的层级分类中检验人格功能的作用。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 24;14(1):340. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03046-z.
4
Factor analysis in personality disorders research: Modern issues and illustrations of practical recommendations.人格障碍研究中的因素分析:现代问题及实际建议的例证。
Personal Disord. 2023 Jan;14(1):105-117. doi: 10.1037/per0000581.