• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低强度游泳结合 5 周血流限制训练可提高峰值摄氧量:一项使用贝叶斯信息先验分布的随机对照试验。

Low-intensity swimming with blood flow restriction over 5 weeks increases VOpeak: A randomized controlled trial using Bayesian informative prior distribution.

机构信息

Department of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Fitness and Health, IST University of Applied Sciences, Duesseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Aug;23(8):1622-1628. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2180671. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1080/17461391.2023.2180671
PMID:36780333
Abstract

Peak oxygen uptake (VOpeak) and speed at first (LT1, minimal lactate equivalent) and second lactate threshold (LT2 = LT1 +1.5 mmol·L) are crucial swimming performance surrogates. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) during low-intensity swimming (LiT) on VOpeak, LT1, and LT2. Eighteen male swimmers (22.7 ±3.0 yrs; 69.9 ±8.5 kg; 1.8 ±0.1 m) were either assigned to the BFR or control (noBFR) group. While BFR was applied during LiT, noBFR completed the identical LIT without BFR application. BFR of the upper limb was applied via customized pneumatic cuffs (75% of occlusion pressure: 135 ±10 mmHg; 8 cm cuff width). BFR training took place three times a week over 5 weeks (accumulated weekly net BFR training: 60 min·week; occlusion per session: 2-times 10 min·session) and was used exclusively at low intensities. VOpeak, LT1, and LT2 diagnostics were employed. Bayesian credible intervals revealed notable VOpeak improvements by +0.29 L·min kg (95% credible interval: -0.26 to +0.85 L·min kg) when comparing BFR vs. noBFR. Speed at LT1 -0.01 m·s (-0.04 to +0.02 m·s) and LT2 -0.01 m·s (-0.03 to +0.02 m·s) did not change meaningfully when BFR was employed. Fifteen sessions of LIT swimming (macrocycle of 5 h over 5 weeks) with a weekly volume of 60 min with BFR application adds additional impact on VOpeak improvement compared to noBFR LIT swimming. Occasional BFR applications should be considered as a promising means to improve relevant performance surrogates in trained swimmers.Low-intensity swimming with blood flow restricted (BFR) induced superior peak oxygen consumption adaptations compared to non-restricted swimming training over a 5-week lasting training periodBFR and non-BFR swimming training-induced similar adaptations regarding swimming speed at first and second lactate thresholdIn conclusion, BFR served as a feasible, promising and beneficial complementary training stimuli to traditional swimming training regarding oxygen consumption adaptations.

摘要

峰值摄氧量(VOpeak)和首次乳酸阈速度(LT1,最小乳酸当量)和第二次乳酸阈速度(LT2=LT1+1.5mmol·L)是游泳表现的关键替代指标。本随机对照研究探讨了低强度游泳期间血流限制(BFR)对 VOpeak、LT1 和 LT2 的影响。18 名男性游泳运动员(22.7±3.0 岁;69.9±8.5kg;1.8±0.1m)被分为 BFR 或对照组(非 BFR)。在进行 LiT 时应用 BFR,非 BFR 在没有 BFR 应用的情况下完成相同的 LiT。上肢的 BFR 通过定制的气动袖带(闭塞压力的 75%:135±10mmHg;8cm 袖带宽度)施加。BFR 训练每周进行 3 次,共 5 周(累计每周净 BFR 训练:60min·周;每次闭塞:2 次 10min·次),并仅在低强度下使用。进行了 VOpeak、LT1 和 LT2 诊断。贝叶斯可信区间显示,与非 BFR 相比,BFR 使 VOpeak 显著提高+0.29L·min·kg(95%可信区间:-0.26 至+0.85L·min·kg)。当使用 BFR 时,LT1 的速度-0.01m·s(-0.04 至+0.02m·s)和 LT2 的速度-0.01m·s(-0.03 至+0.02m·s)没有显著变化。与非 BFR 低强度游泳相比,在 5 周的训练周期内,每周进行 60 分钟的 15 次低强度游泳(5 小时的大周期),外加 BFR 应用,可使 VOpeak 改善更具影响力。在 5 周的训练期间,与非限制游泳训练相比,血流限制(BFR)诱导的低强度游泳引起了更高的峰值耗氧量适应。BFR 和非 BFR 游泳训练引起的首次和第二次乳酸阈速度的适应相似。总之,BFR 是一种可行、有前途和有益的补充训练刺激,可用于传统游泳训练的耗氧量适应。

相似文献

1
Low-intensity swimming with blood flow restriction over 5 weeks increases VOpeak: A randomized controlled trial using Bayesian informative prior distribution.低强度游泳结合 5 周血流限制训练可提高峰值摄氧量:一项使用贝叶斯信息先验分布的随机对照试验。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Aug;23(8):1622-1628. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2180671. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
Low-intensity climbing with blood flow restriction over 5 weeks increases grip and elbow flexor endurance in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial.五周的低强度血流限制攀爬可提高高级攀岩者的握力和屈肘耐力:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Oct;23(10):2031-2037. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2207079. Epub 2023 May 11.
3
Five-Week, Low-Intensity Blood Flow Restriction Rowing Improves V̇ o2 max in Elite Rowers.五周低强度血流限制划船训练可提高精英赛艇运动员的最大摄氧量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):e299-e303. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004755. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
4
Low-intensity blood flow restriction calf muscle training leads to similar functional and structural adaptations than conventional low-load strength training: A randomized controlled trial.低强度血流限制小腿肌肉训练与传统低负荷力量训练引起相似的功能和结构适应性:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0235377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235377. eCollection 2020.
5
Speeding of oxygen uptake kinetics is not different following low-intensity blood-flow-restricted and high-intensity interval training.低强度血流限制和高强度间歇训练后,摄氧量动力学的加速没有差异。
Exp Physiol. 2019 Dec;104(12):1858-1867. doi: 10.1113/EP087727. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
6
Training with blood flow restriction increases femoral artery diameter and thigh oxygen delivery during knee-extensor exercise in recreationally trained men.血流限制训练可增加业余训练男性股动脉直径和伸膝运动时的大腿氧输送。
J Physiol. 2020 Jun;598(12):2337-2353. doi: 10.1113/JP279554. Epub 2020 May 10.
7
Intensity of exercise recovery, blood lactate disappearance, and subsequent swimming performance.运动恢复强度、血乳酸消除及后续游泳表现。
J Sports Sci. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):29-34. doi: 10.1080/02640410701287263.
8
Low intensity rowing with blood flow restriction over 5 weeks increases V̇Omax in elite rowers: A randomized controlled trial.低强度划船结合 5 周血流限制训练增加精英赛艇运动员的最大摄氧量:一项随机对照试验。
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Mar;23(3):304-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
9
Cardiovascular and Perceptual Responses to Resistance Training with Practical Blood Flow Restriction Induced by a Non-Elastic Band vs. Pneumatic Cuff: A Crossover Randomized Study.抗阻训练中实用型血流限制的心血管和知觉反应:非弹性带与气动袖套的对比——一项交叉随机研究。
Percept Mot Skills. 2023 Jun;130(3):1152-1167. doi: 10.1177/00315125231162732. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
Combined effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training and high-intensity resistance training on muscle strength and size.低强度血流限制训练与高强度抗阻训练对肌肉力量和体积的联合影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Oct;111(10):2525-33. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1873-8. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of blood flow restriction training on aerobic capacity and performance in endurance athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血流限制训练对耐力运动员有氧能力和运动表现的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul 2;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01194-3.
2
Effects of aerobic training with blood flow restriction on aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and hypertrophy in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血流限制下的有氧运动训练对年轻人有氧能力、肌肉力量和肌肉肥大的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Physiol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1506386. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1506386. eCollection 2024.
3
Six weeks of polarized functional interval training with large training load reductions does not affect performance gains compared to traditional workouts.
与传统训练相比,六周的极化功能间歇训练且训练负荷大幅降低并不会影响运动成绩的提高。
Front Physiol. 2024 Nov 15;15:1446837. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1446837. eCollection 2024.