• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯因子函数在假设检验结果报告中的应用。

Bayes factor functions for reporting outcomes of hypothesis tests.

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3143.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 21;120(8):e2217331120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2217331120. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2217331120
PMID:36780516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9974512/
Abstract

Bayes factors represent a useful alternative to -values for reporting outcomes of hypothesis tests by providing direct measures of the relative support that data provide to competing hypotheses. Unfortunately, the competing hypotheses have to be specified, and the calculation of Bayes factors in high-dimensional settings can be difficult. To address these problems, we define Bayes factor functions (BFFs) directly from common test statistics. BFFs depend on a single noncentrality parameter that can be expressed as a function of standardized effects, and plots of BFFs versus effect size provide informative summaries of hypothesis tests that can be easily aggregated across studies. Such summaries eliminate the need for arbitrary -value thresholds to define "statistical significance." Because BFFs are defined using nonlocal alternative prior densities, they provide more rapid accumulation of evidence in favor of true null hypotheses without sacrificing efficiency in supporting true alternative hypotheses. BFFs can be expressed in closed form and can be computed easily from , , , and statistics.

摘要

贝叶斯因子为报告假设检验结果提供了一种有用的替代方法,与 P 值相比,它可以直接衡量数据对竞争假设的相对支持程度。不幸的是,需要指定竞争假设,并且在高维环境中计算贝叶斯因子可能很困难。为了解决这些问题,我们直接从常见的检验统计量定义贝叶斯因子函数(BFF)。BFF 取决于一个单一的非中心参数,该参数可以表示为标准化效应的函数,并且 BFF 与效应量的关系图提供了假设检验的信息性总结,这些总结可以很容易地在研究之间进行汇总。这种总结消除了使用任意 P 值阈值来定义“统计显著性”的需要。由于 BFF 是使用非局部替代先验密度定义的,因此它们可以在不牺牲支持真实替代假设效率的情况下,更快速地积累有利于真实零假设的证据。BFF 可以用封闭形式表示,并且可以很容易地从 t、F、 和 统计量中计算出来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a86/9974512/86e32fe73c9b/pnas.2217331120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a86/9974512/b50516f91bbc/pnas.2217331120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a86/9974512/dc8ba5d4f5ee/pnas.2217331120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a86/9974512/86e32fe73c9b/pnas.2217331120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a86/9974512/b50516f91bbc/pnas.2217331120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a86/9974512/dc8ba5d4f5ee/pnas.2217331120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a86/9974512/86e32fe73c9b/pnas.2217331120fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayes factor functions for reporting outcomes of hypothesis tests.贝叶斯因子函数在假设检验结果报告中的应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 21;120(8):e2217331120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2217331120. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Prior sensitivity of null hypothesis Bayesian testing.先验敏感性的零假设贝叶斯检验。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Oct;27(5):804-821. doi: 10.1037/met0000292. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
3
Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.心理学中贝叶斯假设检验的有效替代方法。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Apr;29(2):243-261. doi: 10.1037/met0000482. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
4
Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses.近似调整分数贝叶斯因子:一种检验信息性假设的通用方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 May;71(2):229-261. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12110. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses.贝叶斯因子方法在区间零假设检验中的应用。
Psychol Methods. 2011 Dec;16(4):406-19. doi: 10.1037/a0024377. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
6
Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in cluster-randomized trials.贝叶斯评价在整群随机试验中信息性假设。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):126-137. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1149-x.
7
Bayesian design of single-arm phase II clinical trials with continuous monitoring.具有连续监测的单臂II期临床试验的贝叶斯设计
Clin Trials. 2009 Jun;6(3):217-26. doi: 10.1177/1740774509105221.
8
Improving Inferences About Null Effects With Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests.贝叶斯因子和等效检验提高关于零效应的推断。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):45-57. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby065.
9
A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.贝叶斯因子假设检验教程。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Oct;24(5):539-556. doi: 10.1037/met0000201. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
10
UNIFORMLY MOST POWERFUL BAYESIAN TESTS.一致最强大贝叶斯检验
Ann Stat. 2013;41(4):1716-1741. doi: 10.1214/13-AOS1123.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in treatment effects of lecanemab and donanemab: A Bayesian reanalysis of CLARITY-AD and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2.lecanemab和donanemab治疗效果的性别差异:对CLARITY-AD和TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2的贝叶斯再分析
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Sep 5;11(3):e70155. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70155. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Predictors of post-discharge pain outcomes after colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study.结直肠手术后出院后疼痛结局的预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12127-z.
3
Effectiveness of steroids and antiviral agents in the treatment of Bell's palsy.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.心理学中贝叶斯假设检验的有效替代方法。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Apr;29(2):243-261. doi: 10.1037/met0000482. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
2
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
3
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery.为何重复研究比原始发现具有更高的科学价值。
类固醇和抗病毒药物治疗贝尔麻痹的有效性。
Med Pharm Rep. 2025 Jul;98(3):267-282. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2786. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
4
On a generalizable approach for sample size determination in Bayesian t tests.关于贝叶斯t检验中样本量确定的一种可推广方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Mar 31;57(5):130. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02654-x.
5
Using Bayesian Hypothesis-testing to Reanalyze Randomized Controlled Trials: Does it Always Tell the Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth?使用贝叶斯假设检验重新分析随机对照试验:它总是能说出全部真相、唯一真相且没有其他真相吗?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov;28(11):1005-1008. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24833. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
6
Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution.神经科学中的实用贝叶斯推断:或者我是如何学会不再担忧并接受分布的。
eNeuro. 2024 Jul 23;11(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0484-23.2024. Print 2024 Jul.
7
Local orchestration of distributed functional patterns supporting loss and restoration of consciousness in the primate brain.支持灵长类动物大脑意识丧失和恢复的分布式功能模式的局部编排。
Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 11;15(1):2171. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46382-w.
8
Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution.神经科学中的实用贝叶斯推理:或者说我是如何学会不再担忧并接受分布的。
bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 7:2023.11.19.567743. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.19.567743.
9
Utility of standing office blood pressure in detecting hypertension in healthy adults.站立位血压在健康成年人高血压检测中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42297-6.
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e137. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000729.
4
Redefine statistical significance.重新定义统计学显著性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;2(1):6-10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.
5
NON-LOCAL PRIORS FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL ESTIMATION.用于高维估计的非局部先验
J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112(517):254-265. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1130634. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
Introduction to Bayesian Inference for Psychology.心理学贝叶斯推断导论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):5-34. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1262-3.
7
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.统计检验、P 值、置信区间与检验效能:误解指南
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3. Epub 2016 May 21.
8
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
9
Scientific method: statistical errors.科学方法:统计误差
Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):150-2. doi: 10.1038/506150a.
10
Revised standards for statistical evidence.修订后的统计证据标准。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 26;110(48):19313-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313476110. Epub 2013 Nov 11.