1Khmelnitskyi Cooperative Trade and Economic Institute, Ukraine.
2Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law, Ukraine.
Georgian Med News. 2022 Dec(333):28-34.
The purpose of the article is, on the basis of a comparative legal study of common and distinctive features of the norms of the criminal law of Ukraine, Georgia, Poland, and the Czech Republic on the examination, to determine the feasibility and necessity of the obligatory participation of a dentist in a forensic medical examination, namely: dental expertise. Based on the analysis of the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Code of Ukraine, Georgia, Poland, and the Czech Republic the task is to outline ways to improve the norms of the criminal law and medical legislation of Ukraine and Georgia in this area. It has been established that the constitutional provision of the right to human health in Ukraine and Georgia is contained not only in the codes and medical legislation of both states, but also in a number of international legal acts that have been ratified by the parliaments mentioned above. The analysis of the relevant norms revealed the imperfection of the definitions of concepts and terms, ways, and methods of implementing the norms, which should reflect the specified right. It has been established that the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Code of Ukraine, Georgia, Poland and the Czech Republic and methodological recommendations regarding the participation of a specialist doctor in a forensic medical examination to collect evidence in the commission of a crime have common features, formulations, and requirements. Thus, this article can serve as a driving force for the collection, research, analysis, and evaluation of modern scientific data on forensic dental traumatology, identification of a person by dental status and issues bordering on it, and also serve as a presentation of the features of expertise in cases of criminal prosecution of medical dental workers. The outcome of this research is unlikely to be an exhaustive presentation of all the problems mentioned and each of those presented in particular. But, in turn, the article will contribute to the improvement of the teaching of forensic dentistry and the development of forensic examination, forensic dental examination in particular.
本文旨在通过对乌克兰、格鲁吉亚、波兰和捷克共和国刑法典中关于法医检查的规范的共同和独特特征进行比较法律研究,确定强制牙医参与法医检查(即牙科鉴定)的可行性和必要性。基于对乌克兰、格鲁吉亚、波兰和捷克共和国刑事诉讼法典和刑法典规范的分析,任务是概述在这方面完善乌克兰和格鲁吉亚刑法和医疗立法规范的方法。已经确定,乌克兰和格鲁吉亚宪法规定的人权健康权不仅包含在这两个国家的法典和医疗立法中,还包含在一些已经被上述议会批准的国际法律文件中。对相关规范的分析揭示了概念和术语、实施规范的方式和方法的定义存在不完善之处,这些规范应该反映出所指定的权利。已经确定,乌克兰、格鲁吉亚、波兰和捷克共和国的刑事诉讼法典和刑法典以及关于专家医生参与法医检查以收集犯罪行为证据的方法建议具有共同的特征、表述和要求。因此,本文可以作为收集、研究、分析和评估现代法医牙外伤学科学数据、通过牙齿状况和与之相关的问题识别个人以及作为刑事起诉医疗牙科工作者案件中鉴定特征的展示的动力。这项研究的结果不太可能详尽地介绍所有提到的问题和每个具体的问题。但是,反过来,本文将有助于改进法医牙科学的教学和发展,特别是法医检查和法医牙科检查。