Suppr超能文献

比较轻松式和摇篮式哺乳在初产妇体验中的效果:一项平行随机临床试验。

Comparing the effects of breastfeeding in the laid-back and cradle position upon the experiences of primiparous women: a parallel randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Feb 13;24(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07143-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Appropriate positioning is crucial to successful breastfeeding and its continuation. Positioning can create, prevent, or correct breastfeeding problems. This study aimed to determine and compare the effects of both the laid-back and cradle positions upon the breastfeeding experiences of primiparous (cisgender) women.

METHODS

A parallel randomized clinical trial was conducted with a sample of primiparous women (n = 168) with a gestational age of between 31 and 34 weeks, referring to the perinatal clinic of Shahid Gharazi Hospital in Malayer (Hamadan Province, Iran). Participants were recruited via convenience sampling and allocated to one of two groups: intervention (laid-back position) (n = 85) and control (cradle position) (n = 83) using the random block method. Breastfeeding education was given to both groups during two sessions (weeks 31-34 and 35--37 of pregnancy) by "baby-friendly" accredited hospitals in Iran. The intervention group was instructed on how to breastfeed using the laid-back position. The control group was instructed on how to breastfeed using the cradle position. In the immediate postnatal period, breastfeeding positions were assessed in both groups. Breastfeeding experiences were measured once at the time of participants returning home and again at both 1 week and 2 weeks following birth, using the breastfeeding experience scale. Data analysis was undertaken using the SPSS software version 21. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of concerns relating to participants nor their breasts, milk insufficiency, neonate, process, or breastfeeding experience at any time point measured. The means (SDs) of breastfeeding experience at the time of discharge, 1 week, and 2 weeks after childbirth in intervention group were 26.07 (4.533), 26.85 (3.812), and 26.65 (4.632) respectively. The means (SDs) of breastfeeding experience at the time of discharge, 1 week, and 2 weeks after childbirth in control group were 25.42 (3.315), 26.68 (3.872), and 25.41 (4.05) respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in breastfeeding experiences whether the laid-back or cradle position is used. Thus, broader education on breastfeeding and the provision of comprehensive support may be more effective in optimizing one's experience of breastfeeding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration date: 2021 July 21, Code: IRCT20180427039436N10, https://irct.ir/user/trial/57054/view.

摘要

背景与目的

正确的哺乳姿势对于成功进行母乳喂养及其持续至关重要。哺乳姿势可以预防、创造或纠正哺乳问题。本研究旨在比较和评估反向躺卧式和摇篮式哺乳姿势对初产妇(顺性别)母乳喂养体验的影响。

方法

采用平行随机临床试验方法,对 168 名初产妇(孕周 31-34 周)进行研究,这些产妇均在伊朗马拉耶尔沙哈达迪医院(哈马丹省)的围产期诊所就诊。采用便利抽样法招募参与者,并按照随机区组法将其分为两组:干预组(反向躺卧式,n=85)和对照组(摇篮式,n=83)。在伊朗的“爱婴医院”进行了两次母乳喂养教育课程(孕期第 31-34 周和 35-37 周)。干预组接受了反向躺卧式母乳喂养指导,对照组接受了摇篮式母乳喂养指导。在产后即刻,对两组的哺乳姿势进行评估。在参与者返回家中时、产后 1 周和 2 周时,使用母乳喂养体验量表对母乳喂养体验进行了测量。数据分析采用 SPSS 软件版本 21。P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在参与者的关注点、乳房、乳汁不足、新生儿、过程或母乳喂养体验方面,两组在任何测量时间点均无统计学差异。干预组产后即刻、产后 1 周和 2 周的母乳喂养体验均值(标准差)分别为 26.07(4.533)、26.85(3.812)和 26.65(4.632)。对照组产后即刻、产后 1 周和 2 周的母乳喂养体验均值(标准差)分别为 25.42(3.315)、26.68(3.872)和 25.41(4.05)。

结论

使用反向躺卧式或摇篮式哺乳姿势,母乳喂养体验无差异。因此,更广泛的母乳喂养教育和全面的支持可能更有效地优化母乳喂养体验。

试验注册

注册日期:2021 年 7 月 21 日,注册号:IRCT20180427039436N10,https://irct.ir/user/trial/57054/view.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验