• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉米地坦、利扎曲普坦和ubrogepant 治疗偏头痛急性发作的疗效、安全性及间接比较:文献的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy, safety and indirect comparisons of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature.

机构信息

Headache Group, Wolfson CARD, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2023 Mar;43(3):3331024231151419. doi: 10.1177/03331024231151419.

DOI:10.1177/03331024231151419
PMID:36786357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to study the efficacy and safety of newly developed drugs for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

METHODS

MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 11 February 2022. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials examining all formulations of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of adults with migraine, were included. Data were extracted following the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Seven studies (SAMURAI, SPARTAN, CENTURION, Study 302, Study 303, ACHIEVE I and II) involving  = 12,859 patients were included. All treatments were superior in efficacy to placebo. Lasmiditan 200 mg showed the highest two-hour pain freedom, while two-hour freedom from most bothersome symptom was equally achieved by the higher doses of lasmiditan (100 and 200 mg), rimegepant and the higher doses of ubrogepant (50 and 100 mg). The odds of treatment-emergent adverse events were greatest with all doses of lasmiditan.

CONCLUSION

Lasmiditan 200 mg was the most effective intervention in the treatment of migraine attacks, although it was associated with high degrees of dizziness, nausea and somnolence. Rimegepant showed slightly lower, but similar efficacy rates to lasmiditan. Ubrogepant had overall the best tolerability profile. These conclusions are limited by the absence of head-to-head comparisons, limitations of individual trials and of the meta-analysis methodology itself. CRD42022308224.

摘要

背景

我们进行了一项网状荟萃分析,以研究新开发的用于急性偏头痛治疗的药物的疗效和安全性。

方法

从建库至 2022 年 2 月 11 日,我们通过 MEDLINE(PubMed 数据库)、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记库检索了相关文献。纳入了评估拉米替坦、rimegepant 和ubrogepant 所有剂型用于急性治疗偏头痛的成人的 3 期随机对照试验。根据 PRISMA 指南提取数据。

结果

纳入了 7 项研究(SAMURAI、SPARTAN、CENTURION、Study 302、Study 303、ACHIEVE I 和 II),共涉及 12859 例患者。所有治疗均优于安慰剂。拉米替坦 200mg 在两小时时的疼痛缓解率最高,而较高剂量的拉米替坦(100mg 和 200mg)、rimegepant 和较高剂量的 ubrogepant(50mg 和 100mg)同样可在两小时时实现最恼人症状的缓解。拉米替坦所有剂量的治疗后新发不良事件发生率最高。

结论

拉米替坦 200mg 是治疗偏头痛发作最有效的干预措施,尽管其与较高程度的头晕、恶心和嗜睡相关。rimegepant 的疗效率略低于拉米替坦,但相似。ubrogepant 的总体耐受性最好。这些结论受到缺乏头对头比较、单个试验的局限性以及荟萃分析方法本身的局限性的限制。CRD42022308224。

相似文献

1
Efficacy, safety and indirect comparisons of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature.拉米地坦、利扎曲普坦和ubrogepant 治疗偏头痛急性发作的疗效、安全性及间接比较:文献的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cephalalgia. 2023 Mar;43(3):3331024231151419. doi: 10.1177/03331024231151419.
2
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.拉米地坦与降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)拮抗剂用于成人偏头痛急性治疗的有效性和安全性比较:随机试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Headache Pain. 2024 Feb 5;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01723-4.
3
Efficacy of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for acute treatment of migraine in triptan insufficient responders: systematic review and network meta-analysis.利扎曲坦、rimegepant 和ubrogepant 治疗曲坦类药物反应不足的偏头痛急性发作的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Nov 8;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01904-1.
4
Comparative effects of drug interventions for the acute management of migraine episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人偏头痛发作急性期药物干预的比较效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 18;386:e080107. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080107.
5
Ditans vs Gepants: A Systematic Review and Indirect Network Meta-Analysis for Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.双靶点抗组胺药与 gepants:疗效和安全性比较分析的系统评价与间接网络荟萃分析
Neurol India. 2021 Mar-Apr;69(Supplement):S43-S50. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.315991.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Comparative efficacy and safety of rimegepant, ubrogepant, and lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine: a network meta-analysis.利马曲班、乌布曲班和拉米替坦治疗偏头痛急性发作的疗效和安全性比较:网状荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Jan;22(1):155-166. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1945444. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Saudi clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prevention of migraine headache.沙特偏头痛治疗与预防临床实践指南。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2025 Apr;30(2):77-91. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2025.2.20240097.
2
Efficacy of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for acute treatment of migraine in triptan insufficient responders: systematic review and network meta-analysis.利扎曲坦、rimegepant 和ubrogepant 治疗曲坦类药物反应不足的偏头痛急性发作的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Nov 8;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01904-1.
3
Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.
原发性头痛的特征:第 1 部分 - 偏头痛。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Oct 31;25(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01889-x.
4
Migraine and Pregnancy.偏头痛与妊娠
Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;14(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/life14101224.
5
Comparative effects of drug interventions for the acute management of migraine episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人偏头痛发作急性期药物干预的比较效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 18;386:e080107. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080107.
6
Evidence-based review and frontiers of migraine therapy.偏头痛治疗的循证综述与前沿进展
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Mar;37(3):e14899. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14899. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
7
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.拉米地坦与降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)拮抗剂用于成人偏头痛急性治疗的有效性和安全性比较:随机试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Headache Pain. 2024 Feb 5;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01723-4.
8
[New therapeutic era for migraine attacks with recently approved monoclonal antibodies, ditans and gepants].[近期获批的单克隆抗体、双靶点药物和 gepants 开启偏头痛治疗新时代]
Rev Neurol. 2024 Jan 16;78(2):47-57. doi: 10.33588/rn.7802.2023176.
9
Health equity, care access and quality in headache - part 2.健康公平、头痛护理可及性和质量 - 第 2 部分。
J Headache Pain. 2023 Dec 13;24(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01699-7.
10
A Comprehensive Review of the Mechanism, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ubrogepant in the Treatment of Migraine.ubrogepant治疗偏头痛的机制、疗效、安全性及耐受性的全面综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 2;15(11):e48160. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48160. eCollection 2023 Nov.