Beauchaine K A, Kaminski J R, Gorga M P
Boys Town National Institute for Communication Disorders in Children, Omaha, Nebraska.
Ear Hear. 1987 Oct;8(5):292-7. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198710000-00007.
Click-evoked auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) were measured using a Beyer DT48 circumaural earphone and an Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone in a group of normal-hearing subjects. Comparisons were made between time waveforms and amplitude spectra for the two transducers. ABR waveforms, latencies, and thresholds were compared for the two transducers. Click-evoked ABR and behavioral thresholds were comparable for the two earphones. In addition, absolute response-component latencies differed by an amount that was equivalent to the travel time introduced by the insert earphone's sound-delivery tube. Inter-peak latency differences were virtually identical. These findings suggest that the insert earphone is a viable transducer for clinical ABR evaluations. Further, a temporal correction may be all that is necessary to account for the difference between the insert earphone and the circumaural earphone if other characteristics of the transducers are similar.
在一组听力正常的受试者中,使用拜耳DT48环绕式耳机和音特美ER - 3A插入式耳机测量点击诱发的听觉脑干反应(ABR)。对两种换能器的时间波形和振幅谱进行了比较。比较了两种换能器的ABR波形、潜伏期和阈值。两种耳机的点击诱发ABR和行为阈值相当。此外,绝对反应成分潜伏期的差异量相当于插入式耳机传声管引入的传播时间。峰间潜伏期差异几乎相同。这些发现表明,插入式耳机是用于临床ABR评估的可行换能器。此外,如果换能器的其他特性相似,可能仅需进行时间校正来解释插入式耳机和环绕式耳机之间的差异。