Carneiro T S, Favoreto M W, Bernardi L G, Bandeca M C, Borges Cpf, Reis A, Loguercio A D
Taynara S Carneiro, DDDS, MSc, PhD student, Department of Stomatology, IDIBO research group, Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Michael W Favoreto, DDS, MSc, PhD student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2023 Mar 1;48(2):146-154. doi: 10.2341/21-053-L.
The objective of this study was to evaluate if the application method (tip with brush or tip without brush) and hydrogen peroxide (HP) concentration (6% or 35% self-mixing) of in-office bleaching gel influences the penetration of HP into the pulp chamber, color change, and the amount of bleaching gel used.
Forty healthy premolars were randomly divided into the following five groups (n=8): no treatment; HP6% using a tip with a brush, HP6% using a tip without a brush, HP35% using a tip with a brush, and HP35% using a tip without a brush. After treatments, the HP concentration (μg/mL) within the pulp chamber was determined using UV-Vis spectrophotometry. The color change (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) was evaluated using a digital spectrophotometer. The amount of gel used (g) in each group was measured using a precision analytical balance. Data from each test were submitted to parametric tests (α=0.05).
The tip with a brush resulted in a lower amount of HP inside the pulp chamber and less gel used when compared with the tip without a brush, regardless of HP concentration (p<0.05). However, regarding the tip used, although no significant difference was observed when HP35% was used (p>0.05), a higher whitening effect was observed when the 6% HP was applied without a brush as opposed to with a tip brush (p<0.05).
The use of a tip with a brush, regardless of the in-office bleaching gel concentration (6% or 35% self-mixing), presented a lower penetration and lower volume of spent gel when compared to a tip without brush. However, the whitening effect depended on the concentration of HP used.
本研究的目的是评估诊室漂白凝胶的应用方法(带刷尖或不带刷尖)和过氧化氢(HP)浓度(6%或35%自混合)是否会影响HP渗入髓腔、颜色变化以及所用漂白凝胶的量。
将40颗健康前磨牙随机分为以下五组(n = 8):不治疗;使用带刷尖的HP6%、使用不带刷尖的HP6%、使用带刷尖的HP35%以及使用不带刷尖的HP35%。治疗后,使用紫外可见分光光度法测定髓腔内的HP浓度(μg/mL)。使用数字分光光度计评估颜色变化(ΔEab、ΔE00和ΔWID)。使用精密分析天平测量每组所用凝胶的量(g)。每个测试的数据进行参数检验(α = 0.05)。
与不带刷尖相比,无论HP浓度如何,使用带刷尖时髓腔内的HP量更低且所用凝胶更少(p < 0.05)。然而,关于所用刷尖,虽然使用35%HP时未观察到显著差异(p > 0.05),但与使用带刷尖相比,不使用刷尖应用6%HP时观察到更高的美白效果(p < 0.05)。
与不带刷尖相比,无论诊室漂白凝胶浓度(6%或35%自混合)如何,使用带刷尖时HP的渗入和所用凝胶量更低。然而,美白效果取决于所用HP的浓度。