Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748 Bloco M, Sala 64-A, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil.
School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 27;28(12):659. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06041-2.
To evaluate a prior application of an experimental desensitizer containing a hydroxyapatite-capsaicin composite (HAp-CAP) in different concentrations on hydrogen peroxide (HP) diffusion into the pulp chamber, bleaching efficacy (BE) and on physical and chemical alterations of the enamel surface after in-office bleaching.
Forty sound premolars were randomized in five groups according to each experimental condition (n = 8): no bleaching (negative control), only bleaching (positive control), 0.1%, 1% and 5% of HAp-CAP. Four groups were submitted to in-office bleaching (HP 35%) post-desensitizer application. The HP concentration (µg/mL) on the pulp chamber was measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The BE was measured by digital spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔE and ΔWI) before and after 7 days bleaching. Enamel tooth fragments obtained from twenty molars were submitted to the same experimental conditions and analyzed using FE-SEM and EDS, Vickers microhardness (VHN), Raman spectroscopy, and nanoroughness (Ra) by AFM to evaluate morphologic and chemical changes on enamel surface. All data were submitted to statistical analysis (α = 0.05).
The groups treated with HAp-CAP exhibited a lower concentration of HP in the pulp chamber compared to only bleaching group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences observed in BE between HAp-CAP groups and only bleaching group (p > 0.05). Only HAp-CAP 5% showed no significant differences in VHN values when compared to no bleaching group (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences among any group in Ra values (p > 0.05). The groups submitted to HAp-CAP showed a higher mineral concentration when compared to only bleaching group (p < 0.05).
Desensitizers containing HAp-CAP up to 5% effectively reduce HP diffusion into the pulp chamber after in-office bleaching, without interfering to BE and Ra, as well as prevent enamel demineralization.
The use of desensitizers containing HAp-CAP during in-office bleaching treatments offers a promising approach to reduce the risk of pulp irritation caused by hydrogen peroxide diffusion, without compromising the bleaching effectiveness or causing surface roughness.
评估一种含有羟基磷灰石-辣椒素复合(HAp-CAP)的实验脱敏剂在不同浓度下对过氧化氢(HP)渗透入牙髓腔、漂白效果(BE)以及牙齿漂白后釉质表面理化变化的影响。
将 40 颗健康前磨牙随机分为 5 组,每组根据实验条件(n=8):无漂白(阴性对照)、仅漂白(阳性对照)、0.1%、1%和 5%的 HAp-CAP。4 组在脱敏剂应用后进行诊室漂白(HP 35%)。通过紫外可见分光光度计测量牙髓腔内 HP 浓度(µg/mL)。通过数字分光光度计(ΔE、ΔE和ΔWI)测量漂白前后 7 天的 BE。从 20 颗磨牙上获得釉质牙碎片,进行相同的实验条件分析,使用 FE-SEM 和 EDS、维氏硬度(VHN)、拉曼光谱和原子力显微镜的纳米粗糙度(Ra)评估釉质表面形态和化学变化。所有数据均进行统计学分析(α=0.05)。
与仅漂白组相比,使用 HAp-CAP 处理的组牙髓腔内 HP 浓度较低(p<0.05)。HAp-CAP 组与仅漂白组之间的 BE 无显著差异(p>0.05)。与无漂白组相比,仅 HAp-CAP 5%组的 VHN 值无显著差异(p>0.05)。各组 Ra 值之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。与仅漂白组相比,使用 HAp-CAP 的组显示出更高的矿物质浓度(p<0.05)。
含有 HAp-CAP 的脱敏剂可有效减少诊室漂白后 HP 渗透入牙髓腔,同时不影响 BE 和 Ra,还能防止釉质脱矿。
在诊室漂白治疗中使用含有 HAp-CAP 的脱敏剂为减少过氧化氢扩散引起的牙髓刺激提供了一种有前景的方法,同时不会影响漂白效果或导致表面粗糙度增加。