Suppr超能文献

以诊所为基础的 SAMBA-II 与集中式实验室病毒载量检测在津巴布韦农村地区 HIV-1 感染的儿童、青少年和年轻成年人中的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Clinic-based SAMBA-II vs centralized laboratory viral load assays among HIV-1 infected children, adolescents and young adults in rural Zimbabwe: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Department of Medicine, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 14;18(2):e0281279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281279. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Zimbabwe, children, adolescents and young adults living with HIV (CALWH) who are on public health antiretroviral therapy (ART) have inadequate viral load (VL) suppression. We assessed whether a clinic-based VL monitoring could decrease 12-month virologic failure rates among these CALWH.

METHODS

The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03986099. CALWH in care at Chidamoyo Christian Hospital (CCH) and 8 rural outreach sites (ROS) on long-term community-based ART were randomized (1:1) to 6 monthly VL monitoring by COBAS®Ampliprep®/Taqman48® HIV-1 at the provincial referral laboratory (PRL) as per standard of care (SOC) or by the clinic-based SAMBA II assay, Diagnostics for the Real World, at CCH. VL suppression, turn-around-time (TAT) for VL results, drug switching and drug resistance in second-line failure were assessed at 12 months.

RESULTS

Of 390 CALWH enrolled 347 (89%) completed 12 months follow-up. Median (IQR) age and ART duration were 14.1 (9.7-18.2) and 6.4 (3.7-7.9) years, respectively. Over half (57%) of the participants were female. At enrolment, 78 (20%) had VL ≥1,000 copies/ml and VL suppression of 80% was unchanged after 12 months, with no significant difference between the SOC (81%) and the clinic-based (80%) arms (p = 0.528). Median (IQR) months to confirmatory VL result at CCH vs PRL was 4.0 (2.1-4.4) vs 4.5 (3.5-6.3) respectively; p = 0.027 at 12 months. Drug switching was documented among 26/347 (7%) participants with no difference between the median (IQR) time to switch in SOC vs clinic-based arms (5.1 (3.9-10.0) months vs 4.4 (2.5-8.4) respectively; p = 0.569). Out of 24 confirmed second-line failures, only 4/19 (21%) had protease inhibitor resistance.

CONCLUSION

In rural Zimbabwe, the clinic-based SAMBA II assay was able to provide confirmatory VL results faster than the SOC VL assay at the PRL. However, this rapid TAT did not allow for a more efficient drug switch among these CALWH.

摘要

背景

在津巴布韦,接受公共卫生抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的儿童、青少年和青年艾滋病毒感染者(CALWH)的病毒载量(VL)抑制不足。我们评估了基于诊所的 VL 监测是否可以降低这些 CALWH 中 12 个月时的病毒学失败率。

方法

该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册:NCT03986099。在长期社区为基础的 ART 中,在 Chidamoyo 基督教医院(CCH)和 8 个农村外展点(ROS)接受护理的 CALWH 按 1:1 随机分配(1:1)接受 COBAS®Ampliprep®/Taqman48® HIV-1 每 6 个月一次的 VL 监测,通过省级转介实验室(PRL)按标准护理(SOC)或通过诊所的 SAMBA II 检测,诊断现实世界,在 CCH。在 12 个月时评估 VL 抑制、VL 结果的周转时间(TAT)、药物转换和二线治疗失败的耐药性。

结果

在纳入的 390 名 CALWH 中,有 347 名(89%)完成了 12 个月的随访。中位(IQR)年龄和 ART 持续时间分别为 14.1(9.7-18.2)和 6.4(3.7-7.9)年,分别。超过一半(57%)的参与者为女性。在入组时,有 78 名(20%)的 VL≥1000 拷贝/ml,VL 抑制率为 80%,12 个月后无变化,SOC(81%)和基于诊所的(80%)手臂之间没有显著差异(p=0.528)。在 CCH 与 PRL 分别确认 VL 结果的中位(IQR)时间分别为 4.0(2.1-4.4)个月和 4.5(3.5-6.3)个月;p=0.027,在 12 个月时。在 26/347(7%)的参与者中记录了药物转换,SOC 与基于诊所的手臂之间在中位(IQR)药物转换时间上没有差异(5.1(3.9-10.0)个月与 4.4(2.5-8.4)个月;p=0.569)。在 24 例确认的二线治疗失败中,只有 4/19(21%)有蛋白酶抑制剂耐药。

结论

在津巴布韦农村地区,基于诊所的 SAMBA II 检测能够比 SOC 在 PRL 更快地提供确认性 VL 结果。然而,这种快速的 TAT 并没有使这些 CALWH 中的药物转换更有效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/778a/9928130/84a63c8acbc7/pone.0281279.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验