Suppr超能文献

被紧急医疗服务提供者怀疑为急性中风但不符合院前中风筛查测试条件的不合作患者:最终医院诊断及特征

Uncooperative patients suspected of acute stroke ineligible for prehospital stroke screening test by emergency medical service providers: final hospital diagnoses and characteristics.

作者信息

Han Sol, Song Sung Wook, Hong Hansol, Kim Woo Jeong, Kang Young Joon, Park Chang Bae, Kang Jeong Ho, Bu Ji Hwan, Lee Sung Kgun, Ko Seo Young, Lee Soo Hoon, Kang Chul-Hoo

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;10(2):213-223. doi: 10.15441/ceem.22.372. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the hospital diagnoses and characteristics of uncooperative prehospital patients suspected of acute stroke who could not undergo a prehospital stroke screening test (PHSST).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at a single academic hospital with a regional stroke center. We analyzed three scenario-based prehospital stroke screening performances using the final hospital diagnoses: (1) a conservative approach only in patients who underwent the PHSST, (2) a real-world approach that considered all uncooperative patients as screening positive, and (3) a contrapositive approach that all uncooperative patients were considered as negative.

RESULTS

Of the 2,836 emergency medical services (EMS)-transported adult patients who met the prehospital criteria for suspicion of acute stroke, 486 (17.1%) were uncooperative, and 570 (20.1%) had a confirmed final diagnosis of acute stroke. The diagnosis in the uncooperative group did not differ from that in the cooperative group (22.0% vs. 19.7%, P=0.246). The diagnostic performances of the PHSST in the conservative approach were as follows: 79.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.5%-83.1%), 90.2% specificity (95% CI, 88.8%-91.6%), and 0.849 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; 95% CI, 0.829-0.868). The sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% (95% CI, 80.0%-86.3%) and 75.2% (95% CI, 73.3%-76.9%), respectively, in the real-world approach and 64.6% (95% CI, 60.5%-68.5%) and 91.9% (95% CI, 90.7%-93.0%), respectively, in the contrapositive approach. No significant difference was evident in the AUC between the real-world approach and the contrapositive approach (0.792 [95% CI, 0.775-0.810] vs. 0.782 [95% CI, 0.762-0.803], P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

We found overestimation (false positive) and underestimation (false negative) in the uncooperative group depending on the scenario-based EMS stroke screening policy for uncooperative prehospital patients suspected of acute stroke.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了疑似急性卒中但无法进行院前卒中筛查试验(PHSST)的不合作院前患者的医院诊断及特征。

方法

本回顾性观察性研究在一家设有区域卒中中心的单一学术医院进行。我们根据最终的医院诊断分析了三种基于场景的院前卒中筛查表现:(1)仅对接受PHSST的患者采用保守方法;(2)将所有不合作患者视为筛查阳性的实际应用方法;(3)将所有不合作患者视为阴性的反证法。

结果

在2836例符合院前疑似急性卒中标准且由紧急医疗服务(EMS)转运的成年患者中,486例(17.1%)不合作,570例(20.1%)最终确诊为急性卒中。不合作组的诊断与合作组无差异(22.0%对19.7%,P = 0.246)。保守方法中PHSST的诊断性能如下:灵敏度为79.5%(95%置信区间[CI],75.5% - 83.1%),特异度为90.2%(95% CI,88.8% - 91.6%),受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.849(95% CI,0.829 - 0.868)。实际应用方法中的灵敏度和特异度分别为83.3%(95% CI,80.0% - 86.3%)和75.2%(95% CI,73.3% - 76.9%),反证法中的灵敏度和特异度分别为64.6%(95% CI,60.5% - 68.5%)和91.9%(95% CI,90.7% - 93.0%)。实际应用方法和反证法的AUC之间无显著差异(0.792[95% CI,0.775 - 0.810]对0.782[95% CI,0.762 - 0.803],P>0.05)。

结论

我们发现,对于疑似急性卒中的不合作院前患者,根据基于场景的EMS卒中筛查策略,不合作组存在高估(假阳性)和低估(假阴性)情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8126/10350364/7ab199592fbf/ceem-22-372f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验