Conflict and Health Research Group, Department of War Studies, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Hull HU6 7RX, Hull, UK.
BMJ Mil Health. 2024 Jul 19;170(e1):e36-e39. doi: 10.1136/military-2022-002318.
This paper considers the potential ethical tensions in the conduct of Defence Engagement (Health) (DE(H)) activities. Multiple academic papers have described the ethical dimensions of topics such as 'medical rules of eligibility', cultural differences in clinical behaviour when providing mentoring support to military health professions, MEDCAPS (non-emergency primary care clinics by international military medical personnel direct to the indigenous civilian population) and military medical collaboration with the civilian public health system and humanitarian organisations. After a short summary of principles and perspectives in military healthcare ethics (MHE), this paper considers the ethical risks of DE(H) activities at the strategic, operational and tactical level. The paper closes by discussing how to prepare military healthcare personnel for ethical challenges during DE(H) tasks. This includes considering the wider legal, professional, societal and public health perspectives alongside clinical perspectives in the analysis of an MHE issue. In conclusion, potential MHE issues during DE(H) activities are predictable and personnel should be trained to identify and address them. This paper forms part of a special issue of BMJ Military Health dedicated to Defence Healthcare Engagement.
本文考虑了在开展国防参与(健康)(DE(H))活动时可能存在的伦理紧张局势。多篇学术论文描述了“医疗资格规则”等主题的伦理维度,以及在向军事卫生专业人员提供指导支持时临床行为的文化差异、向当地平民直接提供非紧急初级保健诊所的医疗救助(MEDCAPS)以及军事医疗与平民公共卫生系统和人道主义组织的合作。在简要总结军事医疗保健伦理(MHE)的原则和观点之后,本文考虑了战略、作战和战术层面上 DE(H)活动的伦理风险。本文最后讨论了如何使军事卫生保健人员为 DE(H)任务中的伦理挑战做好准备。这包括在分析 MHE 问题时,除了临床观点外,还要考虑更广泛的法律、专业、社会和公共卫生观点。总之,在 DE(H)活动期间可能出现的潜在 MHE 问题是可以预测的,应该对人员进行培训以识别和解决这些问题。本文是专门针对国防保健参与的 BMJ 军事保健特刊的一部分。