• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利三级限制措施中 SARS-CoV-2 的传播与地区经济劣势:多层次方法。

SARS-CoV-2 spread and area economic disadvantage in the italian three-tier restrictions: a multilevel approach.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology - Regional Health Service, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy.

Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;23(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15246-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-15246-1
PMID:36788600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926448/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To face the second wave of COVID-19, Italy implemented a tiered restriction system with different limitation levels (yellow = medium; orange = medium-high, red = high) at the beginning of November 2020. The restrictions systematically reduced the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 with increasing strength for increasing tier. However, it is unknown whether the effect of limitations was equal between provinces with different socioeconomic levels. Therefore, we investigated the association between the province's socioeconomic level and SARS-CoV-2 infection daily reproduction number in each restriction level.

METHODS

We measured the province's socioeconomic level as the percentage of individuals whose 2019 total yearly income was lower than 10,000€, using the measure as a proxy of economic disadvantage. We estimated the daily reproduction number (Rt) at the province level using the SARS-CoV-2 daily incidence data from November 2020 to May 2021. We then used multilevel linear regression models with random intercepts stratified by restriction level to estimate the association between economic disadvantage and Rt. We also adjusted the analyses for potential confounders of the association between the province's economic disadvantage and the Rt: the percentage of people with 0-5 years, the quartiles of population density, and the geographical repartition.

RESULTS

Overall, we found increasing Rt in yellow (+ 0.004 p < 0.01, from Rt = 0.99 to 1.08 in three weeks) and containing effects for the orange (-0.005 p < 0.01, from Rt = 1.03 to 0.93) and the red tier (-0.014 p < 0.01, from Rt = 1.05 to 0.76). More economically disadvantaged provinces had higher Rt levels in every tier, although non-significantly in the yellow level (yellow = 0.001 p = 0.19; orange = 0.002 p = 0.02; red = 0.004 p < 0.01). The results showed that the association between economic disadvantage and Rt differed by level of restriction. The number of days into the restriction and the economic disadvantage had statistically significant interactions in every adjusted model. Compared to better off, more economically disadvantaged provinces had slower increasing trends in yellow and steeper Rt reductions in orange, but they showed slower Rt reductions in the highest tier.

CONCLUSION

Lower tiers were more effective in more economically disadvantaged provinces, while the highest restriction level had milder effects. These results underline the importance of accounting for socioeconomic level when implementing public health measures.

摘要

背景

为应对第二波 COVID-19 疫情,意大利于 2020 年 11 月初实施了分级限制制度,不同限制级别(黄色=中度;橙色=中高度;红色=高度)有不同的限制水平。这些限制措施系统地降低了 SARS-CoV-2 的传播,随着限制级别的增加,其效果也逐渐增强。然而,我们尚不清楚在社会经济水平不同的省份之间,限制措施的效果是否相同。因此,我们研究了各省的社会经济水平与每个限制级别中 SARS-CoV-2 感染日繁殖数之间的关系。

方法

我们使用 2019 年总收入低于 10000 欧元的个体比例作为衡量经济劣势的指标,来衡量各省的社会经济水平。我们使用 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 5 月期间 SARS-CoV-2 的日发病率数据,在省级水平上估计日繁殖数(Rt)。然后,我们使用分层限制水平的具有随机截距的多水平线性回归模型来估计经济劣势与 Rt 之间的关联。我们还针对省份经济劣势与 Rt 之间关联的潜在混杂因素调整了分析:0-5 岁人群的比例、人口密度四分位数和地理分布。

结果

总体而言,我们发现黄色级别(Rt 从三周内的 0.99 增加到 1.08,增加 0.004,p<0.01)和橙色级别(-0.005,p<0.01,Rt 从 1.03 降低到 0.93)的 Rt 呈上升趋势,并且红色级别也有抑制作用(-0.014,p<0.01,Rt 从 1.05 降低到 0.76)。在每个级别中,经济较不发达的省份的 Rt 水平都较高,尽管在黄色级别中不显著(黄色:0.001,p=0.19;橙色:0.002,p=0.02;红色:0.004,p<0.01)。结果表明,经济劣势与 Rt 之间的关联因限制级别而异。在每个调整后的模型中,经济劣势与限制天数均存在统计学显著的交互作用。与经济条件较好的省份相比,经济较不发达的省份在黄色级别中呈现出较慢的 Rt 增长趋势,而在橙色级别中则呈现出较陡的 Rt 降低趋势,但在最高级别中呈现出较慢的 Rt 降低趋势。

结论

在经济较不发达的省份中,较低的限制级别更为有效,而最高限制级别则效果较为温和。这些结果强调了在实施公共卫生措施时考虑社会经济水平的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f0/9926570/1ac7245f01a7/12889_2023_15246_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f0/9926570/d2d2f66d8284/12889_2023_15246_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f0/9926570/1ac7245f01a7/12889_2023_15246_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f0/9926570/d2d2f66d8284/12889_2023_15246_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f0/9926570/1ac7245f01a7/12889_2023_15246_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 spread and area economic disadvantage in the italian three-tier restrictions: a multilevel approach.意大利三级限制措施中 SARS-CoV-2 的传播与地区经济劣势:多层次方法。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;23(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15246-1.
2
Investigating the relationship between interventions, contact patterns, and SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility.研究干预措施、接触模式与 SARS-CoV-2 传染性之间的关系。
Epidemics. 2022 Sep;40:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100601. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
3
Impact of tiered restrictions on human activities and the epidemiology of the second wave of COVID-19 in Italy.分层限制对人类活动的影响和意大利第二波 COVID-19 流行病学。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 27;12(1):4570. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24832-z.
4
Quantifying the relationship between lockdowns, mobility, and effective reproduction number (Rt) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Greater Toronto Area.量化多伦多地区新冠疫情期间封锁措施、流动性与有效繁殖数(Rt)之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 11;21(1):1658. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11684-x.
5
Socioeconomic disparities and concentration of the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in the province of Quebec, Canada.加拿大魁北克省 COVID-19 大流行的社会经济差异和传播集中程度。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):1096. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15983-3.
6
Is a tiered restrictions system an effective intervention for COVID-19 control? Results from Portugal, November-December 2020.分层限制系统是否是 COVID-19 控制的有效干预措施?来自葡萄牙的 2020 年 11 月至 12 月的数据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18369-1.
7
Assessing the Impact of Individual Characteristics and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Provinces of Milan and Lodi.评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间个人特征和邻里社会经济地位对米兰和洛迪省的影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2021 Jul;51(3):311-324. doi: 10.1177/0020731421994842. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Socioeconomic differences in the reduction of face-to-face contacts in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.德国 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间面对面接触减少的社会经济差异。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):2419. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14811-4.
9
Impact of tiered measures on social contact and mixing patterns of in Italy during the second wave of COVID-19.分层措施对意大利 COVID-19 第二波期间社会接触和混合模式的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 19;23(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15846-x.
10
Comparison of geographical and individual deprivation index to assess the risk of Sars-CoV-2 infection and disease severity: a retrospective cohort study.比较地理和个体剥夺指数评估 SARS-CoV-2 感染和疾病严重程度的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2024 Apr 4;23(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12942-024-00367-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection - First results from an analysis of surveillance data from Germany.2019冠状病毒病感染风险中的社会经济不平等——来自德国监测数据分析的初步结果
J Health Monit. 2020 Oct 9;5(Suppl 7):18-29. doi: 10.25646/7057.
2
Study on the effects of the restrictive measures for containment of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reproduction number in Italian regions.意大利各地区新冠疫情防控限制措施对繁殖数影响的研究。
Eur Phys J Plus. 2021;136(12):1208. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02076-6. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
3
Area level deprivation and monthly COVID-19 cases: The impact of government policy in England.
区域贫困程度与每月 COVID-19 病例:英格兰政府政策的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114413. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114413. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
4
Socio-economic determinants of mobility responses during the first wave of COVID-19 in Italy: from provinces to neighbourhoods.意大利 COVID-19 疫情第一波期间流动性反应的社会经济决定因素:从省份到社区。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Aug;18(181):20210092. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0092. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
Socioeconomic patterns and COVID-19 outcomes before, during and after the lockdown in Italy (2020).意大利封锁前后(2020 年)的社会经济模式与 COVID-19 结局。
Health Place. 2021 Sep;71:102642. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102642. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
Impact of tiered restrictions on human activities and the epidemiology of the second wave of COVID-19 in Italy.分层限制对人类活动的影响和意大利第二波 COVID-19 流行病学。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 27;12(1):4570. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24832-z.
7
A disproportionate epidemic: COVID-19 cases and deaths among essential workers in Toronto, Canada.不成比例的疫情:加拿大多伦多的基本工人中的 COVID-19 病例和死亡。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;63:63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
8
COVID-19 Inequalities: Individual and Area Socioeconomic Factors (Aragón, Spain).COVID-19 不平等:个体和地区社会经济因素(西班牙阿拉贡)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 19;18(12):6607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126607.
9
Differential impact of mitigation policies and socioeconomic status on COVID-19 prevalence and social distancing in the United States.缓解政策和社会经济地位对美国 COVID-19 患病率和社会隔离的差异影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 14;21(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11149-1.
10
Social inequalities in mobility during and following the COVID-19 associated lockdown of the Madrid metropolitan area in Spain.西班牙马德里大都市区在与 COVID-19 相关的封锁期间和之后流动性方面的社会不平等。
Health Place. 2021 Jul;70:102580. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102580. Epub 2021 May 19.