Thille Arnaud W, Wairy Mathilde, Pape Sylvain Le, Frat Jean-Pierre
Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers 86021, France.
ALIVE Research group, INSERM CIC 1402, University of Poitiers, Poitiers 86021, France.
J Intensive Med. 2021 Jun 29;1(2):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2021.05.003. eCollection 2021 Oct.
In intensive care units (ICUs), the decision to extubate is a critical one because mortality is particularly high in case of reintubation. Around 15% of patients ready to be weaned off a ventilator experience extubation failure leading to reintubation. The use of high-flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation are two alternatives of standard oxygen supplementation that may help to prevent reintubation. High-flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation, may be used to prevent reintubation in patients with low (e.g., patients without comorbidities and with short durations of mechanical ventilation) and high risk (e.g., patients >65 years and those with underlying cardiac disease, chronic respiratory disorders, and/or hypercapnia at the time of extubation) of reintubation, respectively. However, non-invasive ventilation used as a rescue therapy to treat established post-extubation respiratory failure could increase mortality by delaying reintubation, and should therefore be used very carefully in this setting. The oxygenation strategy to be applied in postoperative patients is different from the patients who are extubated in the ICUs. Standard oxygen after a surgical procedure is adequate, even following major abdominal or cardiothoracic surgery, but should probably be switched to high-flow nasal oxygen in patients with hypoxemic. Unlike in patients experiencing post-extubation respiratory failure in ICUs wherein non-invasive ventilation may have deleterious effects, it may actually improve the outcomes in postoperative patients with respiratory failure. This review discusses the different clinical situations with the aim of choosing the most effective oxygenation strategy to prevent post-extubation respiratory failure and to avoid reintubation.
在重症监护病房(ICU),拔管决策至关重要,因为再次插管的情况下死亡率特别高。准备撤机的患者中约15%会经历拔管失败导致再次插管。高流量鼻导管给氧和无创通气是标准氧疗的两种替代方法,可能有助于预防再次插管。高流量鼻导管给氧和无创通气可分别用于预防低再插管风险患者(如无合并症且机械通气时间短的患者)和高再插管风险患者(如65岁以上患者以及拔管时患有基础心脏病、慢性呼吸系统疾病和/或高碳酸血症的患者)的再次插管。然而,无创通气作为治疗已发生的拔管后呼吸衰竭的抢救疗法,可能会因延迟再次插管而增加死亡率,因此在这种情况下应非常谨慎使用。术后患者应用的氧疗策略与在ICU拔管的患者不同。手术后标准氧疗就足够了,即使是在进行大型腹部或心胸手术后,但低氧血症患者可能应改为高流量鼻导管给氧。与在ICU中经历拔管后呼吸衰竭的患者不同,在这类患者中无创通气可能有有害影响,而无创通气实际上可能改善术后呼吸衰竭患者的预后。本综述讨论了不同的临床情况,目的是选择最有效的氧疗策略以预防拔管后呼吸衰竭并避免再次插管。