Suppr超能文献

感染性休克中去甲肾上腺素的替代药物:哪些药物以及何时使用?

Alternatives to norepinephrine in septic shock: Which agents and when?

作者信息

Jozwiak Mathieu

机构信息

Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire l'Archet 1, 151 route Saint Antoine de Ginestière, 06200 Nice, France.

Equipe 2 CARRES UR2CA - Unité de Recherche Clinique Côte d'Azur, Université Côte d'Azur UCA, 06103 Nice, France.

出版信息

J Intensive Med. 2022 Jun 12;2(4):223-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.05.001. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Vasopressors are the cornerstone of hemodynamic management in patients with septic shock. Norepinephrine is currently recommended as the first-line vasopressor in these patients. In addition to norepinephrine, there are many other potent vasopressors with specific properties and/or advantages that act on vessels through different pathways after activation of specific receptors; these could be of interest in patients with septic shock. Dopamine is no longer recommended in patients with septic shock because its use is associated with a higher rate of cardiac arrhythmias without any benefit in terms of mortality or organ dysfunction. Epinephrine is currently considered as a second-line vasopressor therapy, because of the higher rate of associated metabolic and cardiac adverse effects compared with norepinephrine; however, it may be considered in settings where norepinephrine is unavailable or in patients with refractory septic shock and myocardial dysfunction. Owing to its potential effects on mortality and renal function and its norepinephrine-sparing effect, vasopressin is recommended as second-line vasopressor therapy instead of norepinephrine dose escalation in patients with septic shock and persistent arterial hypotension. However, two synthetic analogs of vasopressin, namely, terlipressin and selepressin, have not yet been employed in the management of patients with septic shock, as their use is associated with a higher rate of digital ischemia. Finally, angiotensin Ⅱ also appears to be a promising vasopressor in patients with septic shock, especially in the most severe cases and/or in patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy. Nevertheless, due to limited evidence and concerns regarding safety (which remains unclear because of potential adverse effects related to its marked vasopressor activity), angiotensin Ⅱ is currently not recommended in patients with septic shock. Further studies are needed to better define the role of these vasopressors in the management of these patients.

摘要

血管升压药是感染性休克患者血流动力学管理的基石。目前推荐去甲肾上腺素作为这些患者的一线血管升压药。除去甲肾上腺素外,还有许多其他强效血管升压药,它们具有特定特性和/或优势,在激活特定受体后通过不同途径作用于血管;这些药物可能对感染性休克患者有益。多巴胺不再推荐用于感染性休克患者,因为其使用与较高的心律失常发生率相关,且在死亡率或器官功能障碍方面没有任何益处。肾上腺素目前被视为二线血管升压药治疗,因为与去甲肾上腺素相比,其相关的代谢和心脏不良反应发生率更高;然而,在无法获得去甲肾上腺素的情况下或在难治性感染性休克和心肌功能障碍患者中可考虑使用。由于血管加压素对死亡率和肾功能有潜在影响以及其节省去甲肾上腺素的作用,对于感染性休克和持续性动脉低血压患者,推荐使用血管加压素作为二线血管升压药治疗,而不是增加去甲肾上腺素剂量。然而,血管加压素的两种合成类似物,即特利加压素和塞利加压素,尚未用于感染性休克患者的管理,因为其使用与较高的指端缺血发生率相关。最后,血管紧张素Ⅱ在感染性休克患者中似乎也是一种有前景的血管升压药,尤其是在最严重的病例和/或需要肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者中。尽管如此,由于证据有限以及对安全性的担忧(由于其显著的血管升压活性可能产生潜在不良反应,安全性仍不明确),目前不推荐在感染性休克患者中使用血管紧张素Ⅱ。需要进一步研究以更好地明确这些血管升压药在这些患者管理中的作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验