Liu Zhen, Liu Ling-Xiao, Han Qing-Dian, Dong Gui-Zhi, Wang Bin, Zhang Ji-Fang, Lei Sheng-Ming, Liu Yun-Guo
College of Life Sciences, Linyi University, Linyi, China.
College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, China.
J Food Sci. 2023 Apr;88(4):1378-1391. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16500. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
The purpose of this study is to compare the physicochemical properties and volatile flavor compounds of rose tea obtained by the methods of normal temperature drying, hot-air drying (HAD), and vacuum freeze-drying (VFD) and to evaluate the quality of rose tea. The physicochemical results showed that the content of ascorbic acid (VC) and the pH value was the highest in rose tea obtained by HAD. The contents of anthocyanin, proanthocyanidins, and total phenols were highest in rose tea obtained by VFD. However, there was no significant difference in total flavonoids between drying methods. The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in rose tea with different drying methods were analyzed by headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (HS-SPME-GC-MS) and HS GC-ion mobility spectroscopy (HS-GC-IMS), and the flavor fingerprint of rose tea was established by principal component analysis (PCA). The concentration of VOCs in rose tea varied greatly with different drying methods. The main flavor compounds of rose tea were alcohols, esters, aldehydes, and terpenoids. HS-GC-IMS was used for the identification of volatile flavor compounds of rose tea, thereby helping to assess the quality of rose tea. In addition, the rose tea samples with different drying methods were well distinguished by PCA. This study deepens the understanding of the physicochemical properties and volatile flavor compounds of rose tea with different drying methods and provides a reference for the identification of rose tea with different drying methods. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: This study deepens the understanding of the physicochemical properties and volatile flavor compounds of rose tea with different drying methods and provides a reference for the identification of rose tea with different drying methods. It also provides an effective theoretical basis for consumers to buy rose tea.
本研究旨在比较通过常温干燥、热风干燥(HAD)和真空冷冻干燥(VFD)方法获得的玫瑰茶的理化性质和挥发性风味化合物,并评估玫瑰茶的品质。理化结果表明,HAD获得的玫瑰茶中抗坏血酸(VC)含量和pH值最高。VFD获得的玫瑰茶中花青素、原花青素和总酚含量最高。然而,干燥方法之间总黄酮含量没有显著差异。采用顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用(HS-SPME-GC-MS)和顶空气相色谱-离子迁移谱(HS-GC-IMS)分析不同干燥方法的玫瑰茶中的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs),并通过主成分分析(PCA)建立玫瑰茶的风味指纹图谱。不同干燥方法下玫瑰茶中VOCs的浓度差异很大。玫瑰茶的主要风味化合物为醇类、酯类、醛类和萜类。HS-GC-IMS用于鉴定玫瑰茶的挥发性风味化合物,从而有助于评估玫瑰茶的品质。此外,PCA能很好地区分不同干燥方法的玫瑰茶样品。本研究加深了对不同干燥方法玫瑰茶的理化性质和挥发性风味化合物的理解,为不同干燥方法玫瑰茶的鉴别提供了参考。实际应用:本研究加深了对不同干燥方法玫瑰茶的理化性质和挥发性风味化合物的理解,为不同干燥方法玫瑰茶的鉴别提供了参考。它还为消费者购买玫瑰茶提供了有效的理论依据。