• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌切除术后外科医生与病理学家的直肠系膜全切除分级比较:单机构分析

Comparison of surgeon and pathologist total mesorectal excision grade after rectal cancer resection: A single institution analysis.

作者信息

Kato Patrick J, Kanters Arielle E, Rivard Samantha J, Hendren Samantha, Ramm Carole, Albright Jeremy, Schumaker Kate E, Cleary Robert K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2023 May;127(6):983-990. doi: 10.1002/jso.27214. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1002/jso.27214
PMID:36790079
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Colorectal Cancer Project initiative sought to increase adoption of surgeon total mesorectal excision (TME) grading through standardized education and synoptic operative reporting. Our study aim was to assess initiative impact and level of agreement between surgeon and pathologist-determined TME grades.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparison of surgeon and pathologist TME grades before and after initiative implementation using a prospectively maintained enhanced recovery colorectal surgery database.

RESULTS

There were 112 TMEs before, and 53 TMEs following initiative implementation. There was a significant increase in surgeon TME-grade reporting in the postinitiative period (25.0% pre- vs. 81.1% post-, p < 0.001). Pathologist TME-grade reporting was high in both time periods and there was no significant change (91.1% pre- vs. 88.7% post-, p = 0.84). Surgeon and pathologist agreement was 59.3% in the preinitiative period (Κ "minimal"   0.356) and 65.0% in the postinitiative period (Κ "moderate" = 0.605, p = 0.827). There was no significant association between clinical T-stage and surgeon or pathologist TME grade.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon TME grading improves with education and synoptic operative reporting. There is only moderate agreement between surgeon and pathologist, a finding that requires further study. Organized regional initiatives are effective at implementing rectal cancer management quality improvement.

摘要

背景

密歇根外科质量协作组织的结直肠癌项目倡议旨在通过标准化教育和概要性手术报告来提高外科医生直肠系膜全切除术(TME)分级的采用率。我们的研究目的是评估该倡议的影响以及外科医生和病理学家确定的TME分级之间的一致性水平。

方法

这是一项回顾性比较,使用前瞻性维护的强化康复结直肠手术数据库,对比倡议实施前后外科医生和病理学家的TME分级。

结果

倡议实施前有112例TME手术,实施后有53例。倡议实施后外科医生TME分级报告显著增加(实施前为25.0%,实施后为81.1%,p < 0.001)。两个时期病理学家的TME分级报告率都很高,且无显著变化(实施前为91.1%,实施后为88.7%,p = 0.84)。倡议实施前外科医生和病理学家的一致性为59.3%(Κ“最小” = 0.356),实施后为65.0%(Κ“中等” = 0.605,p = 0.827)。临床T分期与外科医生或病理学家的TME分级之间无显著关联。

结论

通过教育和概要性手术报告,外科医生的TME分级得到改善。外科医生和病理学家之间只有中等程度的一致性,这一发现需要进一步研究。有组织的区域倡议在实施直肠癌管理质量改进方面是有效的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of surgeon and pathologist total mesorectal excision grade after rectal cancer resection: A single institution analysis.直肠癌切除术后外科医生与病理学家的直肠系膜全切除分级比较:单机构分析
J Surg Oncol. 2023 May;127(6):983-990. doi: 10.1002/jso.27214. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.影响直肠癌全直肠系膜切除充分性的因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):808-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01256.x. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
3
Association of Plane of Total Mesorectal Excision With Prognosis of Rectal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.全直肠系膜切除平面与直肠癌预后的关系:CAO/ARO/AIO-04 期随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):e181607. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1607. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
4
Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision and robotic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的比较
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6998-7004. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08213-z. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.腹腔镜直肠手术经验可减少机器人直肠切除术的学习曲线:累积和分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4067-4076. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5453-9. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
6
Factors predicting the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.预测直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术质量的因素。
Ann Surg. 2010 Dec;252(6):982-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181efc142.
7
Discordance in Total Mesorectal Excision Specimen Grading in a Prospective Phase 2 Multicenter Rectal Cancer Trial: Are We Overestimating the Quality of Our Resections?在一项前瞻性 2 期多中心直肠癌试验中,全直肠系膜切除标本分级存在不一致性:我们是否高估了我们的切除质量?
Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):452-463. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005948. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除质量与环周切缘深度:前20例机器人手术病例的配对比较
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):603-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12634.
9
[Efficiency analysis on functional protection of nerve plane-oriented laparoscopic total mesorectal excision].[神经平面导向腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术功能保护的效率分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1144-1151. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.009.
10
Does the mesorectal fat area impact the histopathology metrics of the specimen in males undergoing TME for distal rectal cancer?在接受低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的男性患者中,直肠系膜脂肪面积会影响标本的组织病理学指标吗?
Updates Surg. 2023 Apr;75(3):581-588. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01429-9. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Mesorectal Grade and Oncologic Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直肠癌中直肠系膜分级与肿瘤学结局的关联:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep;132(3):437-446. doi: 10.1002/jso.70038. Epub 2025 Jul 11.