Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;55(3):939-947. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.1645. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the per-lesion sensitivity and specificity of the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) 2022 criteria for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with intraindividual comparison of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging with extracellular agents (ECA-MRI) and hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI).
Patients at high risk for HCC who were referred to a tertiary academic institution for hepatic lesions with size ≥ 10 mm between July 2019 and June 2022 were enrolled. A total of 91 patients (mean age, 58.1 years; 76 men and 15 women) with 118 lesions who underwent both ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI were eligible for final analysis. The per-lesion sensitivities and specificities of the KLCA-NCC 2022 criteria using ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI were compared using McNemar's test.
The 118 lesions were 93 HCCs, 4 non-HCC malignancies, and 21 benign lesions. On HBA-MRI, the "definite" HCC category showed significantly higher sensitivity than ECA-MRI (78.5% vs. 58.1%, p < 0.001), with identical specificity (92.0% vs. 92.0%, p > 0.999). For "probable" or "definite" HCC categories, there were no differences in the sensitivity (84.9% vs. 84.9%, p > 0.999) and specificity (84.0% vs. 84.0%, p > 0.999) between ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI.
The "definite" HCC category of the KLCA-NCC 2022 criteria showed higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC on HBA-MRI compared with ECA-MRI, without compromising specificity. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity and specificity of "probable" or "definite" HCC categories according to ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI.
本研究旨在评估韩国肝癌协会-国家癌症中心(KLCA-NCC)2022 标准用于无创诊断肝细胞癌(HCC)的病变内敏感性和特异性,并对磁共振成像(MRI)联合细胞外对比剂(ECA-MRI)和肝胆对比剂(HBA-MRI)的诊断性能进行个体内比较。
本研究纳入了 2019 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月期间因肝脏直径≥10mm 的病变而在三级学术机构就诊的 HCC 高危患者。共有 91 例(平均年龄 58.1 岁;76 名男性和 15 名女性),共 118 个病灶同时接受了 ECA-MRI 和 HBA-MRI 检查,最终纳入本研究。采用 McNemar 检验比较 KLCA-NCC 2022 标准使用 ECA-MRI 和 HBA-MRI 的病变内敏感性和特异性。
118 个病灶中包括 93 个 HCC、4 个非 HCC 恶性肿瘤和 21 个良性病变。在 HBA-MRI 中,“明确”HCC 类别显示出比 ECA-MRI 更高的敏感性(78.5% vs. 58.1%,p<0.001),但特异性相同(92.0% vs. 92.0%,p>0.999)。对于“可能”或“明确”HCC 类别,ECA-MRI 和 HBA-MRI 之间的敏感性(84.9% vs. 84.9%,p>0.999)和特异性(84.0% vs. 84.0%,p>0.999)无差异。
KLCA-NCC 2022 标准的“明确”HCC 类别在 HBA-MRI 诊断 HCC 方面的敏感性高于 ECA-MRI,特异性无差异。根据 ECA-MRI 和 HBA-MRI,“可能”或“明确”HCC 类别的敏感性和特异性无显著差异。