• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用韩国肝癌协会-国家癌症中心 2022 标准,对使用细胞外和肝胆对比剂的 MRI 进行个体内比较,以进行肝细胞癌的非侵入性诊断。

Intraindividual Comparison of MRIs with Extracellular and Hepatobiliary Contrast Agents for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center 2022 Criteria.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;55(3):939-947. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.1645. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

DOI:10.4143/crt.2022.1645
PMID:36791769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10372598/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the per-lesion sensitivity and specificity of the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) 2022 criteria for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with intraindividual comparison of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging with extracellular agents (ECA-MRI) and hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients at high risk for HCC who were referred to a tertiary academic institution for hepatic lesions with size ≥ 10 mm between July 2019 and June 2022 were enrolled. A total of 91 patients (mean age, 58.1 years; 76 men and 15 women) with 118 lesions who underwent both ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI were eligible for final analysis. The per-lesion sensitivities and specificities of the KLCA-NCC 2022 criteria using ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI were compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

The 118 lesions were 93 HCCs, 4 non-HCC malignancies, and 21 benign lesions. On HBA-MRI, the "definite" HCC category showed significantly higher sensitivity than ECA-MRI (78.5% vs. 58.1%, p < 0.001), with identical specificity (92.0% vs. 92.0%, p > 0.999). For "probable" or "definite" HCC categories, there were no differences in the sensitivity (84.9% vs. 84.9%, p > 0.999) and specificity (84.0% vs. 84.0%, p > 0.999) between ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI.

CONCLUSION

The "definite" HCC category of the KLCA-NCC 2022 criteria showed higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC on HBA-MRI compared with ECA-MRI, without compromising specificity. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity and specificity of "probable" or "definite" HCC categories according to ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估韩国肝癌协会-国家癌症中心(KLCA-NCC)2022 标准用于无创诊断肝细胞癌(HCC)的病变内敏感性和特异性,并对磁共振成像(MRI)联合细胞外对比剂(ECA-MRI)和肝胆对比剂(HBA-MRI)的诊断性能进行个体内比较。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 2019 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月期间因肝脏直径≥10mm 的病变而在三级学术机构就诊的 HCC 高危患者。共有 91 例(平均年龄 58.1 岁;76 名男性和 15 名女性),共 118 个病灶同时接受了 ECA-MRI 和 HBA-MRI 检查,最终纳入本研究。采用 McNemar 检验比较 KLCA-NCC 2022 标准使用 ECA-MRI 和 HBA-MRI 的病变内敏感性和特异性。

结果

118 个病灶中包括 93 个 HCC、4 个非 HCC 恶性肿瘤和 21 个良性病变。在 HBA-MRI 中,“明确”HCC 类别显示出比 ECA-MRI 更高的敏感性(78.5% vs. 58.1%,p<0.001),但特异性相同(92.0% vs. 92.0%,p>0.999)。对于“可能”或“明确”HCC 类别,ECA-MRI 和 HBA-MRI 之间的敏感性(84.9% vs. 84.9%,p>0.999)和特异性(84.0% vs. 84.0%,p>0.999)无差异。

结论

KLCA-NCC 2022 标准的“明确”HCC 类别在 HBA-MRI 诊断 HCC 方面的敏感性高于 ECA-MRI,特异性无差异。根据 ECA-MRI 和 HBA-MRI,“可能”或“明确”HCC 类别的敏感性和特异性无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58af/10372598/d2de5d8baf70/crt-2022-1645f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58af/10372598/aa88a27b44d7/crt-2022-1645f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58af/10372598/d2de5d8baf70/crt-2022-1645f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58af/10372598/aa88a27b44d7/crt-2022-1645f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58af/10372598/d2de5d8baf70/crt-2022-1645f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Intraindividual Comparison of MRIs with Extracellular and Hepatobiliary Contrast Agents for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center 2022 Criteria.使用韩国肝癌协会-国家癌症中心 2022 标准,对使用细胞外和肝胆对比剂的 MRI 进行个体内比较,以进行肝细胞癌的非侵入性诊断。
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;55(3):939-947. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.1645. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.使用磁共振成像对肝细胞癌进行无创诊断时LI-RADS 2018与KLCA-NCC 2018的比较
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2020 Jul;26(3):340-351. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0004. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
Diagnostic performance of the 2022 KLCA-NCC criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging with extracellular contrast and hepatobiliary agents: comparison with the 2018 KLCA-NCC criteria.2022年KLCA-NCC肝细胞癌磁共振成像细胞外对比剂和肝胆对比剂诊断标准的诊断性能:与2018年KLCA-NCC标准的比较
J Liver Cancer. 2023 Mar;23(1):157-165. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2023.02.07. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
4
A modified LI-RADS: targetoid tumors with enhancing capsule can be diagnosed as HCC instead of LR-M lesions.一种改良的 LI-RADS:具有增强包膜的靶样肿瘤可被诊断为 HCC,而不是 LR-M 病变。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):912-922. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08124-0. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
Diagnostic Performance of 2018 KLCA-NCC Practice Guideline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or Cirrhosis: Comparison with LI-RADS Version 2018.2018KLCA-NCC 肝细胞癌诊治指南在慢性乙型肝炎或肝硬化患者钆塞酸增强 MRI 中的诊断性能:与 LI-RADS 2018 版的比较
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1066-1076. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0846. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Extracellular Contrast Detects Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Greater Accuracy Than With Gadoxetic Acid or Computed Tomography.磁共振成像联合细胞外对比剂比钆塞酸或计算机断层扫描在检测肝细胞癌方面更准确。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;18(9):2091-2100.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Intraindividual Comparison of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Washout between MRIs with Hepatobiliary and Extracellular Contrast Agents.肝胆外对比剂 MRI 肝细胞癌洗脱的个体内比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 May;22(5):725-734. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1143. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gadoxetic Acid and Extracellular Contrast for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.钆塞酸二钠与细胞外对比剂磁共振成像用于肝脏影像报告与数据系统诊断肝细胞癌的前瞻性个体内比较。
Hepatology. 2018 Dec;68(6):2254-2266. doi: 10.1002/hep.30122. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Diagnosis of recurrent HCC: intraindividual comparison of gadoxetic acid MRI and extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.复发性 HCC 的诊断:钆塞酸 MRI 与细胞外对比增强 MRI 的个体内比较。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jul;44(7):2366-2376. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01968-7.
10
Comparison of extracellular and hepatobiliary MR contrast agents for the diagnosis of small HCCs.用于诊断小肝癌的细胞外和肝胆磁共振造影剂的比较
J Hepatol. 2020 May;72(5):937-945. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.011. Epub 2019 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center 2018 Criteria for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.韩国肝癌协会-国立癌症中心2018年磁共振成像用于肝细胞癌无创诊断标准的验证
J Liver Cancer. 2020 Sep;20(2):120-127. doi: 10.17998/jlc.20.2.120. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.2022 KLCA-NCC 韩国肝细胞癌管理实践指南。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022 Oct;28(4):583-705. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0294. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
3
Diagnostic Performance of KLCA-NCC 2018 Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
KLCA-NCC 2018标准利用磁共振成像诊断肝细胞癌的效能:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 25;11(10):1763. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101763.
4
Diagnostic Performance of 2018 KLCA-NCC Practice Guideline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or Cirrhosis: Comparison with LI-RADS Version 2018.2018KLCA-NCC 肝细胞癌诊治指南在慢性乙型肝炎或肝硬化患者钆塞酸增强 MRI 中的诊断性能:与 LI-RADS 2018 版的比较
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1066-1076. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0846. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Clinicopathologic and MRI features of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in patients with or without cirrhosis.伴有或不伴有肝硬化的肝细胞癌-胆管细胞癌患者的临床病理和 MRI 特征。
Liver Int. 2021 Jul;41(7):1641-1651. doi: 10.1111/liv.14798. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
6
Comparison of the current guidelines for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.比较使用钆塞酸增强磁共振成像诊断肝细胞癌的现行指南。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4492-4503. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07468-3. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Retrospective analysis of current guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in at-risk patients.对高危患者应用钆塞酸增强 MRI 进行肝细胞癌诊断的现行指南的回顾性分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4751-4763. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07577-z. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
8
Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.使用磁共振成像对肝细胞癌进行无创诊断时LI-RADS 2018与KLCA-NCC 2018的比较
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2020 Jul;26(3):340-351. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0004. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Comparison of guidelines for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in transplantation candidates.移植候选者使用钆塞酸增强 MRI 诊断肝细胞癌的指南比较。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4762-4771. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06881-y. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
10
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of imaging criteria for HCCs ≤ 3.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI.比较钆塞酸二钠增强 MRI 诊断≤3.0cm HCC 成像标准的诊断性能。
Hepatol Int. 2020 Jul;14(4):534-543. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10040-2. Epub 2020 Apr 20.