Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.
Division of Endocrinology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan.
Endocr J. 2023 May 29;70(5):489-500. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ22-0585. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
In Japan, the standard method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) for primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosis was changed from radioimmunoassay (RIA) to a novel chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). The purpose of this study is to simulate the possible impact of the change on PA diagnosis. This retrospective study assessed 2,289 PA patients. PACs measured by conventional RIA were transformed to estimated PACs (CLEIA) as follows: RIA (pg/mL) = 1.174 × CLEIA (pg/mL) + 42.3. We applied the estimated PAC (CLEIA) to the conventional cut-off of aldosterone-to-renin activity ratio ≥200 for screening and captopril challenge test (CCT) and PAC ≥60 pg/mL for saline infusion test (SIT). Application of the estimated PAC to screening and confirmatory tests decreased the number of PA diagnoses by 36% (743/2,065) on CCT and 52% (578/1,104) on SIT (discrepant cases). Among the discrepant cases, 87% (548/628) of CCT and 87% (452/522) of SIT were bilateral on adrenal venous sampling (AVS). Surgically treatable aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) were observed in 6% (36/579) and 5% (23/472) of discrepant cases on CCT and SIT, respectively; most were characterized by hypokalemia and/or adrenal nodule on CT imaging. Application of the PAC measured by the novel CLEIA to conventional cut-offs decreases the number of PA diagnoses. Although most discrepant cases were bilateral on AVS, there are some APA cases that were characterized by hypokalemia and/or adrenal tumor on CT. Further studies which evaluate PACs measured by both RIA and CLEIA for each patient are needed to identify new cut-offs for PAC measured by CLEIA.
在日本,原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)诊断的血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)的标准测定方法已从放射免疫分析(RIA)改为新型化学发光酶免疫分析(CLEIA)。本研究旨在模拟这种变化对 PA 诊断的可能影响。本回顾性研究评估了 2289 例 PA 患者。通过常规 RIA 测量的 PAC 转化为估计的 PAC(CLEIA)如下:RIA(pg/mL)=1.174×CLEIA(pg/mL)+42.3。我们将估计的 PAC(CLEIA)应用于传统的醛固酮/肾素活性比值≥200 的筛查和卡托普利挑战试验(CCT)以及盐水输注试验(SIT)中 PAC≥60pg/mL 的切点。应用估计的 PAC 进行筛查和确认试验,使 CCT 上的 PA 诊断减少了 36%(743/2065),SIT 上的诊断减少了 52%(578/1104)(差异病例)。在差异病例中,CCT(548/628)和 SIT(452/522)中双侧肾上腺静脉采样(AVS)的比例分别为 87%和 87%。在 CCT 和 SIT 的差异病例中分别观察到可手术治疗的醛固酮瘤(APA)占 6%(36/579)和 5%(23/472);大多数病例的特点是低钾血症和/或 CT 影像学上的肾上腺结节。应用新型 CLEIA 测定的 PAC 对传统切点的应用降低了 PA 的诊断数量。尽管大多数差异病例在 AVS 上为双侧,但仍有一些 APA 病例的特点是低钾血症和/或 CT 上的肾上腺肿瘤。需要进一步研究用 RIA 和 CLEIA 同时测量每位患者的 PAC,以确定 CLEIA 测定的 PAC 的新切点。