Suppr超能文献

通过在日本冲绳的回顾性分析,研究了用于测量血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)的放射免疫分析(RIA)向化学发光酶免疫分析(CLEIA)的转变对原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)诊断的影响。

Impact of the transition from radioimmunoassay (RIA) to chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for the measurement of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) on the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) via retrospective analyses in Okinawa, Japan.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Hematology and Rheumatology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan.

出版信息

Endocr J. 2024 Sep 2;71(9):895-906. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0227. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

Abstract

In Japan, the traditional method for measuring plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was radioimmunoassay (RIA), which had several challenges, including poor traceability of certified reference materials and reduced detection sensitivity at low concentrations. To overcome these issues, a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for PAC measurement was introduced in April 2021 and the Japan Endocrine Society published new guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from RIA to CLEIA for PAC measurement on PA diagnosis. Data from 190 patients admitted to the Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, between April 2012 and March 2021 were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with PA underwent adrenal venous sampling. The PAC measured by RIA (PAC(RIA)) was converted to the estimated PAC measured by CLEIA (ePAC(CLEIA)) using a conversion formula. The present study evaluated the discordance rates in diagnoses based on screening (SC), captopril challenge test (CCT), saline infusion test (SIT), and diagnosis of PA between results judged by PAC(RIA) according to the previous guidelines and those judged by ePAC(CLEIA) according to the new guidelines. The results revealed discordant diagnosis rates of 6.4% for SC and 10.1% for CCT, with no discordance for SIT. The discordant diagnosis rate for PA was 3.7%. Our study reveals the challenges in establishing appropriate diagnostic criteria for PA using PAC(CLEIA) and highlights the demand for further research on provisionally positive categories.

摘要

在日本,测量血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)的传统方法是放射免疫分析(RIA),但这种方法存在几个挑战,包括认证参考物质的溯源性差和在低浓度下检测灵敏度降低。为了解决这些问题,2021 年 4 月引入了用于 PAC 测量的化学发光酶免疫分析(CLEIA),日本内分泌学会也发布了原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)的新指南。本研究旨在评估从 RIA 过渡到 CLEIA 测量 PAC 对 PA 诊断的影响。分析了 2012 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间在琉球大学医院第二内科住院的 190 名患者的数据。经诊断为 PA 的患者接受了肾上腺静脉采样。通过 RIA(PAC(RIA))测量的 PAC 转换为使用转换公式通过 CLEIA(ePAC(CLEIA))测量的估计 PAC。本研究评估了基于筛选(SC)、卡托普利挑战试验(CCT)、盐水输注试验(SIT)和根据先前指南根据 PAC(RIA)判断的 PA 诊断以及根据新指南根据 ePAC(CLEIA)判断的结果之间的诊断不一致率。结果显示,SC 的诊断不一致率为 6.4%,CCT 的诊断不一致率为 10.1%,SIT 则无诊断不一致。PA 的诊断不一致率为 3.7%。本研究揭示了使用 PAC(CLEIA)为 PA 建立适当诊断标准所面临的挑战,并强调了对临时阳性类别进一步研究的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验