Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Orthop Res. 2023 Oct;41(10):2093-2104. doi: 10.1002/jor.25532. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
The wide variety of cell and tissue culture systems used to study and engineer tendons can make it difficult to choose the best approach and "optimal" culture conditions to test a given hypothesis. Therefore, a breakout session was organized at the 2022 ORS Tendon Section Meeting that focused on establishing a set of guidelines for conducting cell and tissue culture studies of tendon. This paper summarizes the outcomes of that discussion and presents recommendations for future studies. In the case of studying tendon cell behavior, cell and tissue culture systems are reductionist models in which the culture conditions should be strictly defined to approximate the in vivo condition as closely as possible. In contrast, for tissue engineering tendon replacements, the culture conditions do not need to replicate native tendon, but the outcome measures for success should be narrowly defined for the specific clinical application. Common recommendations for both applications are that researchers should perform a baseline phenotypic characterization of the cells that are ultimately used for experimentation. For models of tendon cell behavior, culture conditions should be well justified by existing literature and meticulously reported, tissue explant viability should be assessed, and comparisons to in vivo conditions should be made to determine baseline physiological relevance. For tissue engineering applications, the functional/structural/compositional outcome targets should be defined by the specific tendons they seek to replace, with key biologic and material properties prioritized for construct assessment. Lastly, when engineering tendon replacements, researchers should utilize clinically approved cGMP materials to facilitate clinical translation.
用于研究和工程肌腱的多种细胞和组织培养系统可能使得选择最佳方法和“最佳”培养条件来测试给定假设变得具有挑战性。因此,在 2022 年 ORS 肌腱分会会议上组织了一次分组讨论,重点是为肌腱的细胞和组织培养研究制定一套准则。本文总结了该讨论的结果,并提出了未来研究的建议。在研究肌腱细胞行为的情况下,细胞和组织培养系统是一种还原论模型,其中培养条件应严格定义,以尽可能接近体内条件。相比之下,对于组织工程肌腱替代物,培养条件不需要复制天然肌腱,但成功的度量标准应该针对特定的临床应用进行狭义定义。这两种应用的常见建议是,研究人员应该对最终用于实验的细胞进行基线表型特征分析。对于肌腱细胞行为的模型,培养条件应该有充分的现有文献支持,并进行详细报告,应该评估组织外植体的活力,并与体内条件进行比较,以确定基线生理相关性。对于组织工程应用,功能/结构/组成的目标应该由他们试图替代的特定肌腱来定义,关键的生物学和材料特性应该优先用于构建评估。最后,在工程肌腱替代物时,研究人员应该使用临床批准的 cGMP 材料来促进临床转化。