Département de psychiatrie et neurosciences, Faculté de médecine.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022;42(4):391-395. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001556. Epub 2022 May 12.
Clozapine is the most efficacious antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, clozapine-induced neutropenia may warrant treatment discontinuation, hindering recovery. Several case reports describe clozapine rechallenge or continuation despite neutropenia, although many are subject to selective reporting, with incomplete information and short follow-up periods. Thus, consecutive case series, devoid of such bias, with long-term comprehensive follow-up are needed to better assess this practice. This study aimed to describe consecutively the evolution of every patient in the Québec City catchment area for whom clozapine was either reintroduced after neutropenia during a previous clozapine trial or was maintained despite a first neutropenia.
Patients were identified through clozapine's national hematological monitoring database and their medical records between January 1, 2000, and October 22, 2017.
Twenty-three patients were identified, 8 continued clozapine despite neutropenia, while 15 discontinued clozapine and attempted rechallenge; among the latter, 4 patients were successfully rechallenged after agranulocytosis without the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, which is the largest published consecutively. A total of 6 patients experienced further neutropenia episodes. Every patient who had a neutropenia recurrence also had a possible explanation for neutropenia other than exposure to clozapine. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 16 patients were still on clozapine and 3 cases discontinued because of a hematological event.
This study adds further data on the subject of clozapine rechallenge or continuation despite neutropenia. Clozapine rechallenge after agranulocytosis may be less perilous than first thought, but a systematic review on this specific subject is needed.
氯氮平是治疗抵抗性精神分裂症最有效的抗精神病药。然而,氯氮平引起的中性粒细胞减少症可能需要停止治疗,从而阻碍康复。有几项病例报告描述了尽管存在中性粒细胞减少症,但氯氮平重新开始或继续使用,尽管其中许多报告受到选择性报告的影响,信息不完整且随访时间短。因此,需要进行连续的病例系列研究,排除这种偏见,并进行长期的全面随访,以更好地评估这种做法。本研究旨在描述魁北克市地区每一位患者的病情演变,这些患者在之前的氯氮平试验中因中性粒细胞减少症而重新开始氯氮平治疗,或者尽管第一次出现中性粒细胞减少症仍继续使用氯氮平。
通过氯氮平的全国血液监测数据库和 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 10 月 22 日期间的病历,确定了患者。
确定了 23 名患者,8 名患者继续使用氯氮平,尽管中性粒细胞减少症持续存在,而 15 名患者停止使用氯氮平并尝试重新开始治疗;其中 4 名患者在没有使用粒细胞集落刺激因子的情况下成功重新开始治疗粒细胞缺乏症,这是已发表的最大规模的病例。共有 6 名患者出现进一步的中性粒细胞减少症发作。每位出现中性粒细胞减少症复发的患者都有除接触氯氮平以外的其他中性粒细胞减少症的可能原因。中位随访 4.8 年后,16 名患者仍在使用氯氮平,3 例因血液事件停止使用。
本研究增加了关于氯氮平重新开始或继续使用尽管中性粒细胞减少症的进一步数据。粒细胞缺乏症后重新开始氯氮平治疗可能并不像最初想象的那么危险,但需要对这一特定主题进行系统评价。