• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科重症监护中抗抑郁药中毒的趋势:新旧两代抗抑郁药的比较研究。

Antidepressant Poisoning Trends in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Comparative Study of New- and Old-Generation Antidepressants.

机构信息

From the Departments of Pediatric Intensive Care.

Pediatrics.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023;43(2):139-144. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001668. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001668
PMID:36795032
Abstract

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the frequency, clinical findings, treatment practices, and outcomes of toxicity to old-generation (OG) and new-generation (NG) antidepressants in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) by year-to-year.

METHODS/PROCEDURES: The study included patients hospitalized for antidepressant poisoning during the 11-year period of January 2010 through December 2020. Antidepressants were classified as OG and NG. The groups were compared in terms of patient demographic characteristics, type of poisoning (accidental/suicidal), clinical findings, supportive and extracorporeal treatments received, and outcomes.

FINDINGS/RESULTS: The study included 58 patients (NG, n = 30; OG, n = 28). The median age of the patients was 178 months (range, 13.6-215 months) and 47 patients (81%) were female. Patients admitted for only antidepressant poisoning constituted 13.3% of all poisoning cases (58/436). Of these, 22 cases (37.9%) were accidental and 36 (62.3%) were suicidal. The most common cause of poisoning was amitriptyline (24/28) in the OG group and sertraline (13/30) in the NG group. Neurological symptoms were significantly more common in the OG group (76.2% vs 23.8%), while gastrointestinal involvement was more common in the NG group (82% vs 18%; P = 0.001 and P = 0.026, respectively). Old-generation antidepressant poisoning was associated with more frequent intubation (4 vs 0 patients, P = 0.048) and longer length of PICU stay (median, 1 day [range, 1-8] vs 1 day [range, 1-4], P = 0.019). Rates of therapeutic plasma exchange and intravenous lipid emulsion therapy did not differ ( P = 0.483 and P = 0.229, respectively).

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: In poisoned patients, proper evaluation and management of patients requiring PICU admission are vital for favorable patient outcomes.

摘要

目的/背景:本研究旨在通过逐年比较,比较我院儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中旧一代(OG)和新一代(NG)抗抑郁药中毒的频率、临床发现、治疗方法和结局。

方法/过程:本研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间因抗抑郁药中毒住院的 11 年间的患者。将抗抑郁药分为 OG 和 NG。比较两组患者的人口统计学特征、中毒类型(意外/自杀)、临床发现、接受的支持和体外治疗以及结局。

结果/发现:本研究共纳入 58 例患者(NG 组 30 例,OG 组 28 例)。患者的中位年龄为 178 个月(范围 13.6-215 个月),47 例(81%)为女性。仅因抗抑郁药中毒而入院的患者占所有中毒病例的 13.3%(58/436)。其中,22 例(37.9%)为意外中毒,36 例(62.3%)为自杀中毒。OG 组最常见的中毒药物为阿米替林(24/28),NG 组为舍曲林(13/30)。OG 组的神经症状明显更为常见(76.2%比 23.8%),而 NG 组的胃肠道受累更为常见(82%比 18%;P = 0.001 和 P = 0.026)。OG 组抗抑郁药中毒更常需要插管(4 例比 0 例,P = 0.048),PICU 住院时间更长(中位数 1 天[范围 1-8]比 1 天[范围 1-4],P = 0.019)。治疗性血浆置换和静脉内脂肪乳剂治疗的比例无差异(P = 0.483 和 P = 0.229)。

意义/结论:在中毒患者中,对需要入住 PICU 的患者进行适当的评估和管理对于患者的良好结局至关重要。

相似文献

1
Antidepressant Poisoning Trends in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Comparative Study of New- and Old-Generation Antidepressants.儿科重症监护中抗抑郁药中毒的趋势:新旧两代抗抑郁药的比较研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023;43(2):139-144. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001668. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
2
Retrospective Evaluation of Poisoning Cases Followed Up in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-A 12-Year Experience in a Single Center.回顾性分析 12 年间某单一中心小儿重症监护病房收治的中毒患儿病例
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Oct 1;39(10):766-772. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003041. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
3
Retrospective study of poisoned patients admitted to a hospital's pediatric intensive care unit in Chile.智利一家医院儿科重症监护病房收治的中毒患者的回顾性研究。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2022 Aug;120(4):257-263. doi: 10.5546/aap.2022.eng.257. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
[Patients requiring ICU treatment for acute poisoning-a 20-year single-center retrospective : Acute poisoning in intensive care].[因急性中毒需要重症监护治疗的患者——一项20年单中心回顾性研究:重症监护中的急性中毒]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023 May;118(4):283-292. doi: 10.1007/s00063-022-00937-1. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
5
Poisonings requiring admission to the pediatric intensive care unit: A 5-year review.需要入住儿科重症监护病房的中毒:5 年回顾。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014 Jun;52(5):519-24. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.909601. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
6
The toxicity of antidepressant poisoning: is it changing? A comparative study of cyclic and newer serotonin-specific antidepressants.
Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2002 Dec;14(4):440-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00384.x.
7
Retrospective evaluation of patients at follow-up with acute poisoning in Intensive Care Unit.对重症监护病房急性中毒患者随访情况的回顾性评估。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):223-6. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.164340.
8
Changing trends and predictors of outcome in patients with acute poisoning admitted to the intensive care.入住重症监护病房的急性中毒患者的转归变化趋势及预测因素。
J Trop Pediatr. 2011 Oct;57(5):340-6. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmq099. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
9
Critical care interventions in children aged 6 months to 12 years admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit after unintentional cannabis exposures.6 个月至 12 岁儿童在意外摄入大麻后入住儿科重症监护病房的关键治疗干预措施。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Aug;60(8):960-965. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2022.2059497. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
10
Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers.为家长赋权创造机会:该项目对危重症幼儿及其母亲心理健康/应对结果的影响。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e597-607. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e597.

引用本文的文献

1
Antidepressant Prescription to Children/Adolescents and Its Effects on the Cardiovascular System, Comprising the Actual Questions of Periodicity of the Checkups, Cooperation among Pediatricians, Family Doctors, Cardiologists and Children-Adolescent Psychiatrists.儿童/青少年抗抑郁药处方及其对心血管系统的影响,包括检查周期的实际问题、儿科医生、家庭医生、心脏病专家和儿童青少年精神科医生之间的合作。
Acta Med Litu. 2025;32(1):52-63. doi: 10.15388/Amed.2025.32.1.15. Epub 2025 Feb 18.