Suppr超能文献

《Sonic Hedgehog 抑制剂治疗基底细胞癌的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析(2009-2022)》。

Efficacy and Safety of Sonic Hedgehog Inhibitors in Basal Cell Carcinomas: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2009-2022).

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 May;24(3):359-374. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00763-x. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the skin is the most common form of skin cancer in the United States. In life-threatening, advanced BCC, sonic hedgehog inhibitors (SSHis) remain a pre-eminent treatment option for locally advanced BCC and metastatic BCC.

OBJECTIVE

In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to better characterize the efficacy and safety of SSHis by including final updates from pivotal clinical trials and additional new recent studies.

METHODS

An electronic database search was performed for articles including clinical trials, prospective case series, and retrospective medical record reviews on human subjects. Overall response rates (ORRs) and complete response rates (CRRs) were the primary outcomes. For safety assessment, the prevalence of the following adverse effects was analyzed: muscle spasms, dysgeusia, alopecia, weight loss, fatigue, nausea, myalgias, vomiting, skin squamous cell carcinoma, increased creatine kinase, diarrhea, decreased appetite, and amenorrhea. Analyses were performed using R statistical software. Data were pooled using linear models with fixed effects meta-analysis for primary analyses, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values. Intermolecular differences were calculated using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies (N = 2384 patients) were included in the meta-analysis: 19 studies assessing both efficacy and safety, 2 studies assessing safety only, and 1 study assessing efficacy only. Overall, the pooled ORR for all patients was 64.9% (95% CI 48.2-81.6%), implicating there is at least a partial response (z = 7.60, p < 0.0001) in most patients receiving SSHis. The ORR for vismodegib was 68.5% and 50.1% for sonidegib. The most common adverse effects for vismodegib and sonidegib were muscle spasms (70.5% and 61.0%, respectively), dysgeusia (58.4% and 48.6%, respectively), and alopecia (59.9% and 51.1%, respectively). Patients were likely to experience weight loss (35.1%, p < 0.0001) from vismodegib. Alternatively, patients taking sonidegib experienced more nausea, diarrhea, increased creatine kinase levels, and decreased appetite compared with those receiving vismodegib.

CONCLUSION

SSHis are an effective treatment for advanced BCC disease. Given the high discontinuation rates, management of patient expectations is warranted for compliance and achieving long-term efficacy. It is essential to stay updated with the latest discoveries on the efficacy and safety of SSHis.

摘要

背景

基底细胞癌(BCC)是美国最常见的皮肤癌。在危及生命的晚期 BCC 中, sonic hedgehog 抑制剂(SSHis)仍然是局部晚期 BCC 和转移性 BCC 的首选治疗方法。

目的

在本次更新的系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们旨在通过纳入关键临床试验的最终更新和其他新的近期研究,更好地描述 SSHis 的疗效和安全性。

方法

对包括临床试验、前瞻性病例系列和回顾性病历审查在内的人类受试者的文章进行电子数据库检索。总体缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解率(CRR)是主要结局。对于安全性评估,分析了以下不良反应的发生率:肌肉痉挛、味觉障碍、脱发、体重减轻、疲劳、恶心、肌痛、呕吐、皮肤鳞状细胞癌、肌酸激酶升高、腹泻、食欲减退和闭经。使用 R 统计软件进行分析。使用固定效应荟萃分析对主要分析进行数据汇总,同时还提供了 95%置信区间(CI)和 p 值。使用 Fisher 精确检验计算分子间差异。

结果

共有 22 项研究(N=2384 例患者)纳入荟萃分析:19 项研究评估疗效和安全性,2 项研究仅评估安全性,1 项研究仅评估疗效。总体而言,所有患者的汇总 ORR 为 64.9%(95%CI 48.2-81.6%),表明接受 SSHis 治疗的大多数患者至少有部分缓解(z=7.60,p<0.0001)。维莫德吉的 ORR 为 68.5%,索尼德吉的 ORR 为 50.1%。维莫德吉和索尼德吉最常见的不良反应分别为肌肉痉挛(分别为 70.5%和 61.0%)、味觉障碍(分别为 58.4%和 48.6%)和脱发(分别为 59.9%和 51.1%)。维莫德吉可能导致体重减轻(35.1%,p<0.0001)。相反,与接受维莫德吉治疗的患者相比,接受索尼德吉治疗的患者出现更多的恶心、腹泻、肌酸激酶水平升高和食欲减退。

结论

SSHis 是治疗晚期 BCC 的有效方法。鉴于高停药率,需要管理患者的预期,以确保依从性和实现长期疗效。及时了解 SSHis 的疗效和安全性的最新发现至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验