Allergy and Pneumology Outpatient Clinic, Bergamo, Italy.
Departmental Unit of Allergology, Immunology & Pulmonary Diseases, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Respir Med. 2023 Apr;209:107154. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107154. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
Short-acting beta agonist (SABA)-only treatment is associated with poor asthma control and adverse clinical outcomes. The importance of small airway dysfunction (SAD) is increasingly recognized in asthma, but less is known in patients using SABA-only therapy. We aimed to investigate the impact of SAD on asthma control in an unselected cohort of 60 adults with physician-diagnosed intermittent asthma treated with as-needed SABA monotherapy.
All patients underwent standard spirometry and impulse oscillometry (IOS) at the first visit and were stratified by the presence of SAD defined by IOS (fall in resistance 5-20 Hz [R5-R20]>0.07 kPa × s*L). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to analyze cross-sectional relationships between clinical variables and SAD.
SAD was present in 73% of the cohort. Compared with patients without SAD, adults with SAD had a higher number of severe exacerbations (65.9% versus 25.0%, p < 0.05), higher use of annual SABA canisters (median (IQR), 3 (1.75-3) versus 1 (1-2), p < 0.001), and significantly less well-controlled asthma (11.7% versus 75.0%, p < 0.001). Spirometry parameters were similar between patients with IOS-defined SAD and those without SAD. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that exercise-induced bronchoconstriction symptoms (EIB, odds ratio [OR] 31.18; 95%CI:4.85-365.00) and night awakenings due to asthma (OR 30.30; 95%CI:2.61-1141.00) were independent predictors of SAD, with a high predictive power of the model incorporating these baseline predictors (AUC 0.92).
EIB and nocturnal symptoms are strong predictors of SAD in asthmatic patients using as-needed SABA-monotherapy, helping to distinguish subjects with SAD among patients with asthma when IOS cannot be performed.
短效β激动剂(SABA)单药治疗与哮喘控制不良和不良临床结局相关。小气道功能障碍(SAD)在哮喘中的重要性日益得到认可,但在使用 SABA 单药治疗的患者中了解较少。我们旨在研究 SAD 对 60 名经医生诊断患有间歇性哮喘且按需接受 SABA 单药治疗的成年患者的哮喘控制的影响。
所有患者在首次就诊时均接受标准肺活量测定和脉冲振荡法(IOS)检查,并根据 IOS 定义的 SAD(5-20 Hz 时阻力下降[R5-R20]>0.07 kPa × s*L)存在情况进行分层。采用单变量和多变量分析来分析临床变量与 SAD 之间的横断面关系。
该队列中有 73%的患者存在 SAD。与无 SAD 的患者相比,有 SAD 的成年人发生严重加重的次数更多(65.9%比 25.0%,p<0.05),每年使用 SABA 罐的次数更多(中位数(IQR),3(1.75-3)比 1(1-2),p<0.001),且哮喘控制明显较差(11.7%比 75.0%,p<0.001)。IOS 定义的 SAD 患者与无 SAD 的患者的肺量计参数相似。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,运动诱发的支气管痉挛症状(EIB,比值比[OR]31.18;95%CI:4.85-365.00)和哮喘引起的夜间觉醒(OR 30.30;95%CI:2.61-1141.00)是 SAD 的独立预测因素,该模型纳入这些基线预测因素后具有较高的预测能力(AUC 0.92)。
EIB 和夜间症状是接受按需 SABA 单药治疗的哮喘患者发生 SAD 的有力预测因素,有助于在无法进行 IOS 检查时区分哮喘患者中的 SAD 患者。