Suppr超能文献

脉冲震荡技术定义了肺功能正常的哮喘患者的小气道功能障碍:患病率、临床相关性以及对哮喘控制的影响。

Impulse oscillometry defined small airway dysfunction in asthmatic patients with normal spirometry: Prevalence, clinical associations, and impact on asthma control.

机构信息

Allergy and Pneumology Outpatient Clinic, Bergamo, Italy.

Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2023 Nov;218:107391. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107391. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The small-airway dysfunction (SAD), detected with impulse oscillometry (IOS) methods, has been recently better characterized in patients with asthma. However, little is known about SAD in asthmatic patients with normal spirometry (NS).

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate, in an unselected sample of 321 patients with physician-diagnosed asthma and NS, prevalence, clinical characterization, and impact on asthma control of IOS-defined SAD. As a secondary objective of the study, we focused on comparing the difference between IOS- and spirometry-defined SAD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with a previous diagnosis of asthma but normal spirometry at the moment of the enrollment were stratified by the presence of IOS-defined SAD (difference in resistance at 5 Hz and at 20 Hz [R5-R20] greater than 0.07 kPa x s x L). We have also assessed the presence of SAD defined by spirometry, according to FEF 25-75 < 65% of the predicted. Clinical and laboratory features were collected, and univariable and multivariable analyses were used to analyze cross-sectional associations between clinical variables and outcomes (SAD).

RESULTS

IOS-defined SAD was present in 54.1% of the cohort. In contrast, spirometry-defined SAD was present in only 10% of patients. Subjects with IOS-defined SAD showed less well-controlled asthma and a higher mean inhaled corticosteroid dosage use compared with subjects without SAD (both P < .001). Overweight (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23), exacerbation history (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.34-6.97), asthma-related night awakenings (OR, 6.88; 95% CI, 2.13-22.23), exercise-induced asthma symptoms (OR, 33.5; 95% CI, 9.51-117.8), and controlled asthma (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.84) were independently associated with SAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthmatic patients with IOS-defined SAD showed less well-controlled asthma, more severe exacerbations and higher mean inhaled corticosteroid dosage. We confirmed exercise-induced asthma, asthma-related night awakenings, exacerbation history, and overweight as independently associated with SAD, while showing well-controlled asthma as inversely associated. SAD may be overlooked by standard spirometry.

摘要

背景

小气道功能障碍(SAD)可通过脉冲震荡(IOS)方法检测到,最近在哮喘患者中得到了更好的描述。然而,对于 IOS 定义的 SAD 在肺功能正常(NS)的哮喘患者中的情况知之甚少。

目的

在这项研究中,我们旨在研究 321 名经医生诊断为哮喘且 NS 正常的患者中,以 IOS 定义的 SAD 的患病率、临床特征及其对哮喘控制的影响。作为研究的次要目的,我们专注于比较 IOS 与肺功能定义的 SAD 之间的差异。

方法

将先前诊断为哮喘但在入组时肺功能正常的连续患者按 IOS 定义的 SAD(差异在 5 Hz 和 20 Hz 时的阻力[R5-R20]大于 0.07 kPa x s x L)存在情况进行分层。我们还根据 FEF 25-75<65%的预计值评估了由肺功能定义的 SAD 的存在情况。收集临床和实验室特征,并使用单变量和多变量分析来分析临床变量与结果(SAD)之间的横断面关联。

结果

IOS 定义的 SAD 存在于队列的 54.1%中。相比之下,仅 10%的患者存在肺功能定义的 SAD。与无 SAD 的患者相比,存在 IOS 定义的 SAD 的患者哮喘控制较差,平均吸入皮质类固醇剂量较高(均 P<0.001)。超重(比值比[OR],1.14;95%CI,1.05-1.23)、既往加重史(OR,3.06;95%CI,1.34-6.97)、哮喘相关夜间觉醒(OR,6.88;95%CI,2.13-22.23)、运动诱导的哮喘症状(OR,33.5;95%CI,9.51-117.8)和控制良好的哮喘(OR,0.22;95%CI,0.06-0.84)与 SAD 独立相关。

结论

IOS 定义的 SAD 的哮喘患者哮喘控制较差,加重更严重,吸入皮质类固醇的平均剂量更高。我们证实运动诱导的哮喘、哮喘相关夜间觉醒、加重史和超重与 SAD 独立相关,而控制良好的哮喘则与之相反。SAD 可能被标准肺功能检查忽略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验