Wiken Thea H, Høivik Marte L, Buer Lydia, Warren David J, Bolstad Nils, Moum Bjørn A, Anisdahl Karoline, Småstuen Milada C, Medhus Asle W
Departement of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Dec;58(8):863-873. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2176252. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
Vedolizumab (VDZ) for subcutaneous (SC) administration has recently become available. We aimed to assess feasibility, safety and clinical outcome when switching from intravenous (IV) to SC VDZ maintenance treatment in a real world cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) followed by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).
Eligible IBD patients were switched from IV to SC treatment and assessed six months prior to switch, at baseline and six, twelve and twenty-six weeks after switch. Primary outcome was proportion of patients on SC treatment after 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), clinical disease activity, biochemical markers, treatment interval, serum-VDZ (s-VDZ), preferred route of administration and health-related quality of life.
In total, 108 patients were switched. After 26 weeks, 100 patients (92.6%) were still on SC treatment and median s-VDZ was 47.6 mg/L (IQR 41.3 - 54.6). The most frequent AE was injection site reaction (ISR), reported by 20 patients (18.5%). There were no clinically significant changes in disease activity, biochemical markers and quality of life. The proportion of patients preferring SC administration increased from 28.0% before switch to 59.4% after 26 weeks ( < 0.001).
Nine out of ten patients still received SC treatment after 26 weeks. No change in disease activity occurred, and levels of serum VDZ increased. Although almost one fifth of patients experienced ISRs, a higher proportion favored SC administration at 26 weeks. This study demonstrates that SC maintenance treatment is a safe and feasible alternative to IV treatment.
皮下注射用维多珠单抗(VDZ)最近已上市。我们旨在评估在一个接受治疗药物监测(TDM)的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者真实队列中,从静脉注射(IV)维多珠单抗转换为皮下注射(SC)维多珠单抗维持治疗的可行性、安全性和临床结局。
符合条件的IBD患者从静脉注射转换为皮下注射治疗,并在转换前6个月、基线时以及转换后6周、12周和26周进行评估。主要结局是26周后接受皮下注射治疗的患者比例。次要结局包括不良事件(AE)、临床疾病活动度、生化标志物、治疗间隔、血清维多珠单抗(s-VDZ)、首选给药途径和健康相关生活质量。
共有108例患者进行了转换。26周后,100例患者(92.6%)仍在接受皮下注射治疗,s-VDZ中位数为47.6mg/L(四分位间距41.3 - 54.6)。最常见的不良事件是注射部位反应(ISR),20例患者(18.5%)报告了该反应。疾病活动度、生化标志物和生活质量无临床显著变化。倾向于皮下注射给药的患者比例从转换前的28.0%增加到26周后的59.4%(P<0.001)。
26周后十分之九的患者仍接受皮下注射治疗。疾病活动度无变化,血清维多珠单抗水平升高。尽管近五分之一的患者出现了注射部位反应,但26周时倾向于皮下注射给药的患者比例更高。本研究表明,皮下注射维持治疗是静脉注射治疗的一种安全可行的替代方法。