Kronfeld D S, Parr C P
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square 19348.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987 Sep 15;191(6):660-4.
Veterinarians confronted with situations involving animal welfare, animal rights, and human responsibility assume practical importance in the relationships of veterinarians with clients and other constituencies. To help resolve these situations, the authors briefly compare economics and ethics and discuss the types of rights. An attempt is made to bring animal welfare and animal rights into the same conceptual framework, using an ecologic approach. This reaches the thesis that the less human beings allow animals the right of self-determination, the more we should exercise responsibility in their care and welfare. Actively exercised human responsibility in all uses of animals is offered as a practical and valid alternative to the extreme of abolitionism. This alternative also is applied in a cautionary way to the role of veterinary medicine in specieism. The veterinary profession is urged to be active in the middle ground of the field of animal rights and to firmly establish its relationships to animal welfare and human responsibility.
兽医在面对涉及动物福利、动物权利和人类责任的情况时,在兽医与客户及其他群体的关系中具有实际重要性。为帮助解决这些情况,作者简要比较了经济学和伦理学,并讨论了权利的类型。试图采用生态学方法将动物福利和动物权利纳入同一个概念框架。由此得出论点:人类给予动物的自决权越少,我们就越应在其照料和福利方面履行责任。在动物的所有用途中积极履行人类责任,是作为废除主义极端做法的一种切实可行且有效的替代方案提出的。这种替代方案也以警示的方式应用于兽医在物种主义中的作用。敦促兽医行业在动物权利领域的中间立场积极行动,并牢固确立其与动物福利和人类责任的关系。