Medical Division, South African National Blood Service, Roodepoort, South Africa.
Division of Clinical Haematology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Transfus Med. 2023 Aug;33(4):277-286. doi: 10.1111/tme.12957. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
We performed a mixed-methods study to explore the motivations associated with blood donation by donors with known, but undisclosed HIV-positive status and ARV use (HIV+/ARV+), seeking potential strategies to reduce such donations and mitigate risk for blood recipients. Here, we report predominantly the qualitative component.
A safe and sustainable blood supply is dependent in part, on effective pre-donation donor assessment. We previously described failure by HIV+/ARV+ blood donors to disclose their status. Such donations may lead to transfusion-transmitted HIV.
The social ecological model provided the conceptual framework for this study. Previously identified HIV+/ARV+ donors were invited to complete a survey (including a validated stigma scale) and qualitative interview, which underwent inductive and deductive thematic analysis.
We uncovered two primary motivational paths to HIV+/ARV+ blood donations: privacy and altruism. The latter included a motivation not previously reported in the literature: donating specifically for other people living with HIV (PLWH). The other primary factor was a lack of privacy. These accounts often included donors encountering donation opportunities when accompanied by people to whom they had not and did not plan to disclose their HIV status. Most were highly confident their donations would be identified as HIV-positive and discarded.
We demonstrated a complex interaction between individual, social, cultural, and structural/policy factors in blood donations by PLWH who take ARV. Recommendations to limit HIV + ARV+ donations include: (1) Targeted communication strategies to increase knowledge among PLWH of their deferral from blood donation-without increasing stigma, and (2) development of procedures to assist those who feel unable to opt-out of donation due to privacy concerns.
我们进行了一项混合方法研究,以探索已知但未公开的 HIV 阳性和抗逆转录病毒药物(HIV+/ARV+)使用情况下的献血者的献血动机,寻找减少此类献血并降低血液受者风险的潜在策略。在此,我们主要报告定性部分。
安全和可持续的血液供应部分取决于有效的献血前评估。我们之前描述了 HIV+/ARV+献血者未能披露其身份的情况。此类献血可能导致输血传播的 HIV。
社会生态学模型为这项研究提供了概念框架。我们邀请了之前确定的 HIV+/ARV+献血者完成一项调查(包括一个经过验证的耻辱感量表)和定性访谈,这些调查和访谈经历了归纳和演绎主题分析。
我们发现了 HIV+/ARV+献血的两个主要动机路径:隐私和利他主义。后者包括了一个之前在文献中没有报道过的动机:专门为其他 HIV 感染者(PLWH)献血。另一个主要因素是缺乏隐私。这些说法通常包括献血者在未向他们透露 HIV 状况的人陪同下遇到献血机会,而且他们也没有计划这样做。大多数人非常自信他们的献血会被识别为 HIV 阳性并被丢弃。
我们展示了 PLWH 使用抗逆转录病毒药物进行献血时,个人、社会、文化和结构/政策因素之间的复杂相互作用。限制 HIV+/ARV+献血的建议包括:(1)针对 PLWH 的有针对性的沟通策略,以提高他们对献血时被推迟的认识,而不会增加耻辱感,(2)制定程序,以帮助那些由于隐私问题而感到无法选择退出献血的人。