School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5955 Veterans Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E1, Canada.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Jul 12;30(9):807-819. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad048.
Examine the association between (1) admission frailty and (2) frailty changes during cardiac rehabilitation (CR) with 5-year outcomes (i.e. time to mortality, first hospitalization, first emergency department (ED) visit, and number of hospitalizations, hospital days, and ED visits).
Data from patients admitted to a 12-week CR programme in Halifax, Nova Scotia, from May 2005 to April 2015 (n = 3371) were analysed. A 25-item frailty index (FI) estimated frailty levels at CR admission and completion. FI improvements were determined by calculating the difference between admission and discharge FI. CR data were linked to administrative health data to examine 5-year outcomes [due to all causes and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)]. Cox regression, Fine-Gray models, and negative binomial hurdle models were used to determine the association between FI and outcomes. On average, patients were 61.9 (SD: 10.7) years old and 74% were male. Mean admission FI scores were 0.34 (SD: 0.13), which improved by 0.07 (SD: 0.09) by CR completion. Admission FI was associated with time to mortality [HRs/IRRs per 0.01 FI increase: all causes = 1.02(95% CI 1.01,1.04); CVD = 1.03(1.02,1.05)], hospitalization [all causes = 1.02(1.01,1.02); CVD = 1.02(1.01,1.02)], ED visit [all causes = 1.01(1.00,1.01)], and the number of hospitalizations [all causes = 1.02(95% CI 1.01,1.03); CVD = 1.02(1.00,1.04)], hospital days [all causes = 1.01(1.01,1.03)], and ED visits [all causes = 1.02(1.02,1.03)]. FI improvements during CR had a protective effect regarding time to all-cause hospitalization [0.99(0.98,0.99)] but were not associated with other outcomes.
Frailty status at CR admission was related to long-term adverse outcomes. Frailty improvements during CR were associated with delayed all-cause hospitalization, in which a larger effect was associated with a greater chance of improved outcome.
探讨(1)入院时虚弱与(2)心脏康复(CR)期间虚弱变化与 5 年结局(即死亡率、首次住院、首次急诊就诊、住院次数、住院天数和急诊就诊次数)之间的关系。
分析了 2005 年 5 月至 2015 年 4 月期间在新斯科舍省哈利法克斯接受为期 12 周的 CR 计划的患者的数据(n=3371)。25 项虚弱指数(FI)在 CR 入院和出院时评估虚弱程度。通过计算入院和出院 FI 之间的差值来确定 CR 期间的 FI 改善情况。使用 Cox 回归、Fine-Gray 模型和负二项式障碍模型来确定 FI 与结局之间的关系。平均而言,患者的年龄为 61.9(SD:10.7)岁,74%为男性。平均入院 FI 评分为 0.34(SD:0.13),CR 完成后提高了 0.07(SD:0.09)。入院 FI 与死亡率有关[每增加 0.01 FI 的 HRs/IRRs:所有原因=1.02(95%CI 1.01,1.04);CVD=1.03(1.02,1.05)],住院[所有原因=1.02(95%CI 1.01,1.02);CVD=1.02(1.01,1.02)],急诊就诊[所有原因=1.01(95%CI 1.00,1.01)],以及住院次数[所有原因=1.02(95%CI 1.01,1.03);CVD=1.02(1.00,1.04)],住院天数[所有原因=1.01(95%CI 1.01,1.03)]和急诊就诊次数[所有原因=1.02(95%CI 1.02,1.03)]。CR 期间的 FI 改善对所有原因的住院时间具有保护作用[0.99(0.98,0.99)],但与其他结局无关。
CR 入院时的虚弱状况与长期不良结局有关。CR 期间的虚弱改善与全因住院时间延迟有关,而更大的效果与改善结局的机会更大有关。