Imaging and Artificial Vision Research Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
MAGMA. 2023 Oct;36(5):687-700. doi: 10.1007/s10334-023-01066-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
In the management of the aortic aneurysm, 4D flow magnetic resonance Imaging provides valuable information for the computation of new biomarkers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, accurate segmentation of the aorta is required. Thus, our objective is to evaluate the performance of two automatic segmentation methods on the calculation of aortic wall pressure.
Automatic segmentation of the aorta was performed with methods based on deep learning and multi-atlas using the systolic phase in the 4D flow MRI magnitude image of 36 patients. Using mesh morphing, isotopological meshes were generated, and CFD was performed to calculate the aortic wall pressure. Node-to-node comparisons of the pressure results were made to identify the most robust automatic method respect to the pressures obtained with a manually segmented model.
Deep learning approach presented the best segmentation performance with a mean Dice similarity coefficient and a mean Hausdorff distance (HD) equal to 0.92+/- 0.02 and 21.02+/- 24.20 mm, respectively. At the global level HD is affected by the performance in the abdominal aorta. Locally, this distance decreases to 9.41+/- 3.45 and 5.82+/- 6.23 for the ascending and descending thoracic aorta, respectively. Moreover, with respect to the pressures from the manual segmentations, the differences in the pressures computed from deep learning were lower than those computed from multi-atlas method.
To reduce biases in the calculation of aortic wall pressure, accurate segmentation is needed, particularly in regions with high blood flow velocities. Thus, the deep learning segmen-tation method should be preferred.
在主动脉瘤的管理中,4D 流磁共振成像通过计算流体动力学(CFD)为新的生物标志物的计算提供了有价值的信息。然而,需要对主动脉进行准确的分割。因此,我们的目标是评估两种自动分割方法在计算主动脉壁压力方面的性能。
使用基于深度学习和多图谱的方法对 36 名患者的 4D 流 MRI 幅度图像的收缩期进行主动脉自动分割。使用网格变形,生成等拓扑网格,并进行 CFD 计算主动脉壁压力。对压力结果进行节点到节点的比较,以确定最稳健的自动方法相对于手动分割模型获得的压力。
深度学习方法的分割性能最好,平均 Dice 相似系数和平均 Hausdorff 距离(HD)分别为 0.92+/-0.02 和 21.02+/-24.20mm。在全局水平上,HD 受腹主动脉性能的影响。局部上,升主动脉和降主动脉的 HD 分别降低至 9.41+/-3.45 和 5.82+/-6.23。此外,与手动分割的压力相比,来自深度学习的压力计算的差异低于来自多图谱方法的压力计算的差异。
为了减少主动脉壁压力计算中的偏差,需要进行准确的分割,特别是在血流速度较高的区域。因此,应该优先选择深度学习分割方法。