Suppr超能文献

参加癌症临床试验费用报销计划的多民族患者队列的经历。

Experiences of a Multiethnic Cohort of Patients Enrolled in a Financial Reimbursement Program for Cancer Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Medina Sheyla P, Zhang Sylvia, Nieves Elena, Dornsife Dana L, Johnson Robert, Spicer Darcy, Borno Hala T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA.

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 May;19(5):e801-e810. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00429. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Financial reimbursement programs (FRPs) offset out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses from therapeutic clinical trial (TCT) participation. The study explores patients' experience in TCTs after enrollment in a FRP at two academic medical centers, including barriers and opportunities to improve trial participation.

METHODS

From May 2019 to January 2020, adults diagnosed with cancer and eligible for TCTs and FRP were recruited from the Improving Patient Access to Cancer Clinical Trials randomized trial at the University of California San Francisco and University of Southern California. Patients with income ≤ 700% of national poverty guidelines were eligible. Semistructured interviews were conducted in patients' preferred language. Qualitative analysis was performed by site and preferred language by two independent coders.

RESULTS

Of 65 trial patients, 53 participated (38%, University of California San Francisco; 62%, USC). The median age was 59 (IQR, 46-65) years, and 58% were female. Nearly half (49%) identified as Latinx/Hispanic compared with 32% non-Hispanic White, 10% Asian, 4% Black, 1% Native American, and 4% Others. A third were non-English speakers, 42% had college education or more, and 55% were retired/unemployed. Most common malignancies were gastrointestinal (42%), breast (19%), and genitourinary (13%), and 66% had metastatic disease. Patients experienced long travel time (1-4.5 hours) among 57% and financial toxicity from OOP costs (68%). High acceptability of the FRP was reported (81%). Although 30% of patients reported willingness to discuss finances of cancer treatment/trial with physicians, majority (87%) preferred discussion with social workers or TCT staff. Proposed modifications to TCTs included decentralization, recruitment strategies, voucher structure, and established rates for OOP expenses.

CONCLUSION

Patients' experience with TCTs reveal financial and logistical stressors that may be lessened by the Improving Patient Access to Cancer Clinical Trial reimbursement program. FRPs may address inequities in clinical trial access among low-income and diverse populations.

摘要

目的

财务报销计划(FRP)可抵消参与治疗性临床试验(TCT)产生的自付费用(OOP)。本研究探讨了在两个学术医疗中心参加FRP后患者在TCT中的体验,包括改善试验参与度的障碍和机会。

方法

2019年5月至2020年1月,从加州大学旧金山分校和南加州大学开展的“改善患者参与癌症临床试验”随机试验中招募被诊断患有癌症且符合TCT和FRP条件的成年人。收入≤国家贫困线700%的患者符合条件。采用患者偏好的语言进行半结构化访谈。由两名独立编码员按地点和偏好语言进行定性分析。

结果

65名试验患者中,53名参与(加州大学旧金山分校为38%;南加州大学为62%)。中位年龄为59岁(四分位间距,46 - 65岁),58%为女性。近一半(49%)为拉丁裔/西班牙裔,相比之下,非西班牙裔白人占32%,亚裔占10%,黑人占4%,美洲原住民占1%,其他占4%。三分之一为非英语使用者,42%拥有大学及以上学历,55%已退休/失业。最常见的恶性肿瘤为胃肠道肿瘤(42%)、乳腺癌(19%)和泌尿生殖系统肿瘤(13%),66%患有转移性疾病。57%的患者经历了较长的出行时间(1 - 4.5小时),68%的患者因自付费用而面临经济毒性。FRP的接受度较高(81%)。尽管30%的患者表示愿意与医生讨论癌症治疗/试验的费用问题,但大多数(87%)更倾向于与社会工作者或TCT工作人员讨论。对TCT提出的改进建议包括去中心化、招募策略、代金券结构以及确定自付费用的标准。

结论

患者在TCT中的体验揭示了财务和后勤方面的压力源,“改善患者参与癌症临床试验”报销计划可能会减轻这些压力。FRP可能解决低收入和多样化人群在临床试验参与方面的不平等问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验