Suppr超能文献

应当首先分析无机还是有机射击残留物?

Should inorganic or organic gunshot residues be analysed first?

机构信息

Ecole des Sciences Criminelles, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland.

Microscan Service SA, Chavannes-près-Renens, Switzerland.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Jul;348:111600. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111600. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

Abstract

Gunshot residues (GSR) collected during the investigation of firearm-related incidents can provide useful information for the reconstruction of the events. Two main types of GSR traces can be targeted by forensic scientists, the inorganic (IGSR) and the organic GSR (OGSR). Up to now, forensic laboratories have mainly focused on the detection of inorganic particles on the hands and clothes of a person of interest using carbon stubs analysed by scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS). Several approaches have been proposed to also analyse the organic compounds since they might bring additional information for the investigation. However, implementing such approaches might disrupt the detection of IGSR (and vice versa depending on the applied sequence of analysis). In this work, two sequences were compared for the combined detection of both types of residues. One carbon stub was used for collection, and the analysis was performed either by targeting the IGSR or the OGSR first. The aim was to evaluate which one allows maximum recovery of both types of GSR while minimising losses that might occur at different stages of the analysis process. SEM/EDS was used for the detection of IGSR particles while an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) was used for the analysis of OGSR compounds. Extracting OGSR first required the implementation of an extraction protocol that did not interfere with the IGSR particles present on the stub. Both sequences allowed good recovery of the inorganic particles since no significant difference was observed in the detected concentrations. However, OGSR concentrations were lower after IGSR analysis than before for two compounds (ethyl and methylcentralite). Thus, it is advised to extract rapidly the OGSR before or after IGSR analysis to avoid losses during the storage and analysis processes. The data also indicated that there was a low correlation between IGSR and OGSR highlighting the potential of a combined detection and analysis of both types of GSR.

摘要

射击残留物(GSR)在调查枪支相关事件中提供了有用的信息,可以帮助重建事件。法医科学家主要关注两种类型的 GSR 痕迹,即无机(IGSR)和有机 GSR(OGSR)。到目前为止,法医实验室主要专注于使用扫描电子显微镜结合能量色散 X 射线光谱(SEM/EDS)分析的碳条检测感兴趣人员手上和衣服上的无机颗粒。已经提出了几种方法来分析有机化合物,因为它们可能为调查提供额外的信息。然而,实施这些方法可能会干扰对 IGSR 的检测(反之亦然,这取决于所采用的分析顺序)。在这项工作中,比较了两种序列来联合检测两种类型的残留物。使用一个碳条进行收集,并且分析方法是先针对 IGSR 或 OGSR 进行。目的是评估哪种方法可以最大限度地回收两种类型的 GSR,同时最大限度地减少分析过程不同阶段可能发生的损失。SEM/EDS 用于检测 IGSR 颗粒,而超高效液相色谱串联质谱(UHPLC-MS/MS)用于分析 OGSR 化合物。首先提取 OGSR 需要实施不会干扰 stub 上存在的 IGSR 颗粒的提取方案。两种序列都允许很好地回收无机颗粒,因为在所检测到的浓度中没有观察到明显的差异。然而,在进行 IGSR 分析后,两种化合物(乙基和甲基中央碱)的 OGSR 浓度比分析前低。因此,建议在 IGSR 分析之前或之后迅速提取 OGSR,以避免在储存和分析过程中的损失。数据还表明,IGSR 和 OGSR 之间相关性较低,突出了联合检测和分析两种类型的 GSR 的潜力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验