Department of Psychiatry, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Psychiatry, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Bionics Institue, 384-388 Albert Street, East Melbourne, VIC 3002 Australia.
J Affect Disord. 2023 May 1;328:287-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.126. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
The brain works as an organised, network-like structure of functionally interconnected regions. Disruptions to interconnectivity in certain networks have been linked to symptoms of depression and impairments in cognition. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a low-burden tool by which differences in functional connectivity (FC) can be assessed. This systematic review aims to provide a synthesis of evidence relating to EEG FC in depression. A comprehensive electronic literature search for terms relating to depression, EEG, and FC was conducted on studies published before the end of November 2021, according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing EEG measures of FC of individuals with depression to that of healthy control groups were included. Data was extracted by two independent reviewers, and the quality of EEG FC methods was assessed. Fifty-two studies assessing EEG FC in depression were identified: 36 assessed resting-state FC, and 16 assessed task-related or other (i.e., sleep) FC. Somewhat consistent findings in resting-state studies suggest for no differences between depression and control groups in EEG FC in the delta and gamma frequencies. However, while most resting-state studies noted a difference in alpha, theta, and beta, no clear conclusions could be drawn about the direction of the difference, due to considerable inconsistencies between study design and methodology. This was also true for task-related and other EEG FC. More robust research is needed to understand the true differences in EEG FC in depression. Given that the FC between brain regions drives behaviour, cognition, and emotion, characterising how FC differs in depression is essential for understanding the aetiology of depression.
大脑作为一个组织化的、网络状的结构,由功能上相互连接的区域组成。某些网络中连接的中断与抑郁症状和认知障碍有关。脑电图(EEG)是一种低负担的工具,可以评估功能连接(FC)的差异。本系统综述旨在综合与抑郁相关的 EEG FC 的证据。根据 PRISMA 指南,对发表于 2021 年 11 月底之前的与抑郁、EEG 和 FC 相关的术语进行了全面的电子文献检索。纳入了比较抑郁患者和健康对照组 EEG FC 测量值的研究。由两名独立的审查员提取数据,并评估 EEG FC 方法的质量。共确定了 52 项评估抑郁时 EEG FC 的研究:36 项评估静息状态 FC,16 项评估任务相关或其他(即睡眠)FC。静息状态研究中有些一致的发现表明,抑郁组和对照组之间在 EEG FC 的 delta 和 gamma 频率上没有差异。然而,尽管大多数静息状态研究注意到 alpha、theta 和 beta 之间存在差异,但由于研究设计和方法学之间存在相当大的不一致性,无法得出差异方向的明确结论。任务相关和其他 EEG FC 也是如此。需要更有力的研究来了解抑郁时 EEG FC 的真正差异。鉴于脑区之间的 FC 驱动行为、认知和情绪,描述 FC 在抑郁中如何不同对于理解抑郁的病因至关重要。