• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“轻松行走”项目的面对面和远程教学模式的覆盖范围和影响。

Reach and Impact of In-Person and Remote Delivery Formats of Walk with Ease.

机构信息

North Carolina Center for Health and Wellness, University of North Carolina Asheville, Asheville, NC, USA.

Osteoarthritis Action Alliance, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231152314. doi: 10.1177/00469580231152314.

DOI:10.1177/00469580231152314
PMID:36802816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942182/
Abstract

This descriptive study retrospectively evaluates the reach and impact of cohorts enrolled in Group (in-person, 2017-2020) and Self-Directed (remote, 2019-2020) delivery formats of the evidenced-based health promotion program, Walk with Ease, implemented statewide in North Carolina. An existing dataset consisting of pre- and post-surveys were analyzed for 1,890 participants; 454 (24%) from the Group format and 1,436 (76%) from Self-Directed. Self-Directed participants were younger, had more years of education, represented more Black/African American and multi-racial participants, and participated in more locations than Group, though a higher percentage of Group participants were from rural counties. Self-Directed participants were less likely to report having arthritis, cancer, chronic pain, diabetes, heart disease, high cholesterol, hypertension, kidney disease, stroke, or osteoporosis, though more likely to report being obese or having anxiety or depression. All participants walked more and expressed higher confidence in managing joint pain following the program. These results promote opportunities for enhancing engagement in Walk with Ease with diverse populations.

摘要

本描述性研究回顾性评估了参加循证健康促进计划“轻松行走”的两个组别的参与度和影响:面对面组(2017-2020 年)和自我指导组(远程,2019-2020 年)。该计划在北卡罗来纳州全州范围内实施。对 1890 名参与者的预调查和后调查现有数据集进行了分析;其中 454 名(24%)来自面对面组,1436 名(76%)来自自我指导组。自我指导组参与者更年轻,受教育程度更高,代表了更多的黑人和多种族参与者,并且比面对面组参加了更多的地点,但更多的面对面组参与者来自农村县。自我指导组参与者报告有关节炎、癌症、慢性疼痛、糖尿病、心脏病、高胆固醇、高血压、肾病、中风或骨质疏松症的可能性较低,而报告肥胖、焦虑或抑郁的可能性较高。所有参与者在参加该计划后步行量增加,对管理关节疼痛的信心增强。这些结果为与不同人群增强参与“轻松行走”提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/9942182/31996532f81b/10.1177_00469580231152314-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/9942182/37f169f04d38/10.1177_00469580231152314-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/9942182/f72d862cf29e/10.1177_00469580231152314-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/9942182/31996532f81b/10.1177_00469580231152314-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/9942182/37f169f04d38/10.1177_00469580231152314-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/9942182/f72d862cf29e/10.1177_00469580231152314-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/9942182/31996532f81b/10.1177_00469580231152314-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Reach and Impact of In-Person and Remote Delivery Formats of Walk with Ease.“轻松行走”项目的面对面和远程教学模式的覆盖范围和影响。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231152314. doi: 10.1177/00469580231152314.
2
Achievement of exercise objectives and satisfaction with the walk with ease program-group and self-directed participants.运动目标的达成以及对轻松步行计划组和自主参与者步行情况的满意度。
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(4):228-30. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120920-ARB-453. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
3
Evaluation of group and self-directed formats of the Arthritis Foundation's Walk With Ease Program.评估关节炎基金会“轻松行走计划”的小组和自我指导格式。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1098-107. doi: 10.1002/acr.20490.
4
Impact of the Arthritis Foundation's Walk With Ease Program on arthritis symptoms in African Americans.关节炎基金会的轻松步行计划对非裔美国人关节炎症状的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Nov 13;11:E199. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140147.
5
Self-Directed Walk With Ease Workplace Wellness Program - Montana, 2015-2017.自主步行轻松工作场所健康计划-蒙大拿州,2015-2017 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Nov 23;67(46):1295-1299. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6746a3.
6
Effectiveness of two Arthritis Foundation programs: Walk With Ease, and YOU Can Break the Pain Cycle.关节炎基金会的两个项目的成效:轻松行走和你能打破疼痛循环。
Clin Interv Aging. 2006;1(3):295-306. doi: 10.2147/ciia.2006.1.3.295.
7
Educational Attainment, Health Status, and Program Outcomes in Latino Adults With Arthritis Participating in a Walking Program.关节炎拉丁裔成年人参与步行计划的教育程度、健康状况和项目成果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Oct 18;15:E128. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180129.
8
Evaluation of the self-directed format of Walk With Ease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the Walk-SLE Pilot Study.评价系统性红斑狼疮患者的自行设定格式的“轻松行走”:行走-SLE 初步研究。
Lupus. 2019 May;28(6):764-770. doi: 10.1177/0961203319846387. Epub 2019 May 1.
9
Effectiveness of a Scaled-Up Arthritis Self-Management Program in Oregon: Walk With Ease.俄勒冈州一项扩大规模的关节炎自我管理项目“轻松行走”的成效
Am J Public Health. 2016 Dec;106(12):2227-2230. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303478. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Arthritis Program for Breast Cancer Survivors on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Who Experience Joint Pain.为接受芳香化酶抑制剂治疗且经历关节疼痛的乳腺癌幸存者调整基于证据的关节炎项目。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 11;12:E91. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140535.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Telephone-Delivered Walk With Ease Program on Arthritis-Related Symptoms, Function, and Activity: A Randomized Trial.电话交付的轻松步行计划对关节炎相关症状、功能和活动的有效性:一项随机试验。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jul;77(7):928-938. doi: 10.1002/acr.25515. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural-urban outcome differences associated with COVID-19 hospitalizations in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州 COVID-19 住院患者城乡结局差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0271755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271755. eCollection 2022.
2
In the Path of the Storm: North Carolina's Response to COVID-19's Impact on Historically Marginalized Populations.在风暴的路径上:北卡罗来纳州对新冠疫情对历史上被边缘化人群影响的应对措施
N C Med J. 2021 Jul-Aug;82(4):276-277. doi: 10.18043/ncm.82.4.276.
3
Overcoming Barriers to Implementation in Community Organizations.
克服社区组织实施中的障碍。
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Jul;23(4):708-717. doi: 10.1177/15248399211002851. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
4
Sedentary behaviors and risk of depression: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.久坐行为与抑郁风险:前瞻性研究的荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 22;10(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0715-z.
5
Evaluation of the self-directed format of Walk With Ease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the Walk-SLE Pilot Study.评价系统性红斑狼疮患者的自行设定格式的“轻松行走”:行走-SLE 初步研究。
Lupus. 2019 May;28(6):764-770. doi: 10.1177/0961203319846387. Epub 2019 May 1.
6
The Feasibility of Recruiting and Training Lay Leaders During Real-World Program Delivery and Scale-up: The Case of Walk With Ease.在现实项目实施和推广过程中招募和培训非专业人员的可行性:以轻松步行项目为例。
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Jan;22(1):91-101. doi: 10.1177/1524839919840004. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
Self-Directed Walk With Ease Workplace Wellness Program - Montana, 2015-2017.自主步行轻松工作场所健康计划-蒙大拿州,2015-2017 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Nov 23;67(46):1295-1299. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6746a3.
8
The association between social support and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review.老年人社会支持与身体活动之间的关联:一项系统综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 27;14(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0509-8.
9
Effectiveness of a Scaled-Up Arthritis Self-Management Program in Oregon: Walk With Ease.俄勒冈州一项扩大规模的关节炎自我管理项目“轻松行走”的成效
Am J Public Health. 2016 Dec;106(12):2227-2230. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303478. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
The association between sedentary behaviour and risk of anxiety: a systematic review.久坐行为与焦虑风险之间的关联:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 19;15:513. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1843-x.