• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰地区卫生委员会之间强制性社区治疗令使用情况的差异。

Variation in the use of compulsory community treatment orders between district health boards in New Zealand.

机构信息

Te Whatu Ora Nelson Marlborough, New Zealand.

Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Australas Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;31(3):349-352. doi: 10.1177/10398562231157246. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1177/10398562231157246
PMID:36803072
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report rates of Compulsory Community Treatment Order (CTO) use by District Health Boards (DHBs) in New Zealand and analyse whether socio-demographic factors explain any variability.

METHODS

The annualised rate of CTO use per 100,000 population was calculated for the years 2009-2018 using national databases. Rates were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, and deprivation and are reported according to DHBs to allow comparisons between regions.

RESULTS

The annualised rate of CTO use for New Zealand was 95.5 per 100,000 population. CTO use varied between DHBs from 53 to 184 per 100,000 population. Standardising for demographic variables and deprivation made little difference to this variation. CTO use was higher in males and young adults. Rates for Māori were more than three times that of Caucasian people. CTO use increased as deprivation became more severe.

CONCLUSIONS

CTO use increases with Maori ethnicity, young adulthood, and deprivation. Adjusting for socio-demographic factors does not explain the wide variation in CTO use between DHBs in New Zealand. Other regional factors appear to be the major driver of variation in CTO use.

摘要

目的

报告新西兰地区卫生局(DHBs)使用强制性社区治疗令(CTO)的比率,并分析社会人口因素是否可以解释任何差异。

方法

使用国家数据库计算了 2009 年至 2018 年期间每 10 万人中 CTO 使用的年化率。根据 DHBs 对年龄、性别、族裔和贫困程度进行了调整,以便对各地区进行比较。

结果

新西兰 CTO 使用的年化率为每 10 万人 95.5 例。各 DHBs 的 CTO 使用情况在每 10 万人 53 至 184 例之间有所不同。对人口统计学变量和贫困程度进行标准化处理对这种差异影响不大。CTO 在男性和年轻成年人中的使用频率更高。毛利人的 CTO 使用比率是白种人三倍多。CTO 使用随着贫困程度的加剧而增加。

结论

CTO 使用随着毛利族裔、年轻成年期和贫困程度的增加而增加。调整社会人口因素并不能解释新西兰 DHBs 之间 CTO 使用情况的广泛差异。其他地区因素似乎是 CTO 使用差异的主要驱动因素。

相似文献

1
Variation in the use of compulsory community treatment orders between district health boards in New Zealand.新西兰地区卫生委员会之间强制性社区治疗令使用情况的差异。
Australas Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;31(3):349-352. doi: 10.1177/10398562231157246. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
2
Regional variation in post-operative mortality in New Zealand.新西兰术后死亡率的区域性差异。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 May;92(5):1015-1025. doi: 10.1111/ans.17510. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
3
Community treatment orders in New Zealand: regional variability and international comparisons.新西兰的社区治疗令:地区差异与国际比较。
Australas Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;22(4):352-356. doi: 10.1177/1039856214531080. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
4
Do ethnic and socio-economic inequalities in mortality vary by region in New Zealand? An application of hierarchical Bayesian modelling.新西兰不同地区的种族和社会经济死亡率不平等情况是否存在差异?分层贝叶斯模型的应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Oct;69(8):1252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.036. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
5
Compulsory Community Treatment Orders and health outcomes for Ma-ori in New Zealand.强制性社区治疗令与新西兰毛利人健康状况的关系
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;58(12):1047-1054. doi: 10.1177/00048674241280918. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
6
Equity of publicly-funded hip and knee joint replacement surgery in New Zealand: results from a national observational study.新西兰公立资金支持的髋关节和膝关节置换手术的公平性:一项全国性观察性研究的结果
N Z Med J. 2016 Sep 23;129(1442):8-18.
7
National variation in coronary angiography rates and timing after an acute coronary syndrome in New Zealand (ANZACS-QI 6).新西兰急性冠状动脉综合征后冠状动脉造影率及时间的全国性差异(ANZACS-QI 6)。
N Z Med J. 2016 Jan 8;129(1428):66-78.
8
Does geography explain ethnic inequalities in health in New Zealand?地理位置能解释新西兰健康方面的种族不平等现象吗?
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006 Oct;30(5):457-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00464.x.
9
Service Users' Knowledge and Views on Outpatients' Compulsory Community Treatment Orders: A Cross-Sectional Matched Comparison Study.服务使用者对门诊强制性社区治疗令的认知和看法:一项横断面匹配比较研究。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;64(10):726-735. doi: 10.1177/0706743719828961. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
10
The enrolment gap: who is not enrolling with primary health organizations in Aotearoa New Zealand and what are the implications? An exploration of 2015-2019 administrative data.入学差距:在新西兰,谁没有在初级卫生组织注册,这意味着什么?对 2015-2019 年行政数据的探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Apr 6;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01423-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Coercive, treatment or sensible: What is the place of community treatment orders in psychiatry?强制性、治疗性还是明智之举:社区治疗令在精神病学中的地位是什么?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;59(6):480-481. doi: 10.1177/00048674251331450. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
2
Variations between, and within, jurisdictions in the use of community treatment orders and other compulsory community treatment: study of 402 060 people across four Australian states.不同司法管辖区之间以及辖区内部在使用社区治疗令和其他强制性社区治疗方面的差异:对澳大利亚四个州的402060人进行的研究。
BJPsych Open. 2025 Mar 21;11(2):e57. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.23.
3
Compulsory Community Treatment Orders and health outcomes for Ma-ori in New Zealand.
强制性社区治疗令与新西兰毛利人健康状况的关系
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;58(12):1047-1054. doi: 10.1177/00048674241280918. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
[Compulsory community treatment orders (CTOs): recent research and future directions].[强制社区治疗令(CTOs):近期研究与未来方向]
BJPsych Open. 2023 May 22;9(3):e86. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.71.