Suppr超能文献

苏格兰各医院抗生素治疗持续时间评估,包括 COVID-19 大流行的影响:分段中断时间序列分析。

Evaluation of duration of antibiotic therapy across hospitals in Scotland including the impact of COVID-19 pandemic: a segmented interrupted time series analysis.

机构信息

Public Health Scotland, Scotland, UK.

Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023 Apr;21(4):455-475. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2181789. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the duration of antibiotic use in hospital settings. We evaluated the duration of hospital antibiotic therapy for four commonly prescribed antibiotics (amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, doxycycline, and flucloxacillin) including the assessment of COVID-19 impact.

METHODS

A repeated, cross-sectional study using the Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration system (January/2019-March/2022). Monthly median duration of therapy/duration categories was calculated, stratified by routes of administration, age, and sex. The impact of COVID-19 was assessed using segmented time-series analysis.

RESULTS

There were significant variations in the median duration of therapy across routes of administration (P < 0.05), with the highest value among those antibiotic courses composed of both oral and IV antibiotics ('Both' group). Significantly higher proportions of prescriptions within the 'Both' group had a duration of >7 days compared to oral or IV. The duration of therapy differed significantly by age. Some small statistically significant changes in the level/trends of duration of therapy were observed in the post-COVID-19 period.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence for prolonged duration of therapy were observed, even during COVID-19 pandemic. The duration of IV therapy was relatively short, suggesting timely clinical review and consideration of IV to oral switch. Longer duration of therapy was observed among older patients.

摘要

背景

关于医院环境中抗生素使用的持续时间,我们知之甚少。我们评估了四种常用抗生素(阿莫西林、复方阿莫西林、强力霉素和氟氯西林)的住院抗生素治疗持续时间,包括对 COVID-19 影响的评估。

方法

使用医院电子处方和药物管理系统(2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月)进行重复的、横断面研究。按给药途径、年龄和性别分层,计算每月治疗的中位持续时间/持续时间类别。使用分段时间序列分析评估 COVID-19 的影响。

结果

给药途径之间的治疗中位持续时间存在显著差异(P<0.05),口服和静脉抗生素联合使用的抗生素疗程(“两者”组)的中位持续时间最高。与口服或静脉相比,“两者”组中比例更高的处方持续时间超过 7 天。治疗持续时间随年龄显著不同。在 COVID-19 后期间,治疗持续时间的水平/趋势略有统计学意义的变化。

结论

即使在 COVID-19 大流行期间,也未观察到治疗持续时间延长的证据。静脉治疗的持续时间相对较短,这表明及时进行临床审查并考虑将静脉治疗转换为口服治疗。老年患者的治疗持续时间较长。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验