An Integrative Review of the Relationship Between Intrauterine Devices and Bacterial Vaginosis.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between intrauterine devices (IUDs) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) through an integrative review of the current literature.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, MEDLINE, Health Source, Evidence-Based Medicine's Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, quasi-experimental, and randomized controlled trials examining copper (Cu-IUD) and levonorgestrel (LNG-IUD) use in reproductive- age users with BV occurrence confirmed with Amsel's criteria or Nugent scoring were included. Articles included were published in the past 10 years.

DATA EXTRACTION

Fifteen studies met criteria, after an initial search identified 1,140 potential titles, and two reviewers assessed 62 full-text articles for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data were categorized into three groups: retrospective descriptive cross-sectional studies identifying point prevalence of BV among IUD users; prospective analytic studies examining BV incidence and prevalence among Cu-IUD users; and prospective analytic studies examining BV incidence and prevalence among LNG-IUD users.

CONCLUSION

Synthesis and comparison of studies were difficult because of disparate study designs, sample sizes, comparator groups, and inclusion criteria for individual studies. Synthesis of data from cross-sectional studies showed that all IUD users combined may have an increased point prevalence of BV compared with non-IUD users. These studies did not delineate LNG-IUDs from Cu-IUDs. Findings from cohort and experimental studies suggest a possible increase in BV occurrence among Cu-IUD users. Evidence is lacking to show an association between LNG-IUD use and BV.