• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于肿瘤全基因组测序的疑似胚系致病性变异患者的管理:单中心回顾性分析。

Management of patients with presumed germline pathogenic variant from tumor-only genomic sequencing: A retrospective analysis at a single facility.

机构信息

Personalized Medicine Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.

Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

J Hum Genet. 2023 Jun;68(6):399-408. doi: 10.1038/s10038-023-01133-5. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1038/s10038-023-01133-5
PMID:36804482
Abstract

Cancer treatment is increasingly evolving toward personalized medicine, which sequences numerous cancer-related genes and identifies therapeutic targets. On the other hand, patients with germline pathogenic variants (GPV) have been identified as secondary findings (SF) and oncologists have been urged to handle them. All SF disclosure considerations for patients are addressed and decided at the molecular tumor boards (MTB) in the facility. In this study, we retrospectively summarized the results of all cases in which comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test was conducted at our hospital, and discussed the possibility of presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPV) at MTB. MTB recommended confirmatory testing for 64 patients. Informed consent was obtained from attending physicians for 53 of them, 30 patients requested testing, and 17 patients tested positive for a confirmatory test. Together with already known variants, 4.5 % of the total confirmed in this cohort. Variants verified in this study were BRCA1 (n = 12), BRCA2 (n = 6), MSH2 (n = 2), MSH6 (n = 2), WT1 (n = 2), TP53, MEN1, CHEK2, MLH1, TSC2, PTEN, RB1, and SMARCB1. There was no difference in the tumor's VAF between confirmed positive and negative cases for variants determined as PGPV by MTB. Current results demonstrate the actual number of cases until confirmatory germline test for patients with PGPV from tumor-only CGP test through the discussion at the MTB. The practical results at this single facility will serve as a guide for the management of the selection and distribution of SF in the genome analysis.

摘要

癌症治疗越来越倾向于个性化医疗,即对大量癌症相关基因进行测序,并确定治疗靶点。另一方面,携带种系致病性变异(GPV)的患者已被确定为次要发现(SF),肿瘤学家已被敦促处理这些变异。所有与患者相关的 SF 披露考虑因素都在医疗机构的分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)中进行讨论和决定。在这项研究中,我们回顾性总结了在我院进行全面基因组分析(CGP)检测的所有病例的结果,并讨论了 MTB 中假定种系致病性变异(PGPV)的可能性。MTB 建议对 64 名患者进行确认性检测。其中 53 名患者的主治医生获得了知情同意,30 名患者要求进行检测,17 名患者的确认性检测结果为阳性。与已经知道的变异一起,在该队列中占总确认数的 4.5%。在本研究中验证的变异包括 BRCA1(n=12)、BRCA2(n=6)、MSH2(n=2)、MSH6(n=2)、WT1(n=2)、TP53、MEN1、CHEK2、MLH1、TSC2、PTEN、RB1 和 SMARCB1。在 MTB 确定为 PGPV 的变异的阳性和阴性病例中,肿瘤的 VAF 没有差异。当前结果表明,通过 MTB 讨论,从肿瘤-only CGP 检测到确认阳性的患者的实际种系检测数量。该单一机构的实际结果将为基因组分析中 SF 的选择和分配的管理提供指导。

相似文献

1
Management of patients with presumed germline pathogenic variant from tumor-only genomic sequencing: A retrospective analysis at a single facility.基于肿瘤全基因组测序的疑似胚系致病性变异患者的管理:单中心回顾性分析。
J Hum Genet. 2023 Jun;68(6):399-408. doi: 10.1038/s10038-023-01133-5. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
2
Germline sequencing for presumed germline pathogenic variants via tumor-only comprehensive genomic profiling.通过仅肿瘤的全面基因组分析对疑似胚系致病性变异进行胚系测序。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug;27(8):1256-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02176-y. Epub 2022 May 14.
3
Incidental germline variants in 1000 advanced cancers on a prospective somatic genomic profiling protocol.基于前瞻性体细胞基因组分析方案的1000例晚期癌症中的偶然种系变异。
Ann Oncol. 2016 May;27(5):795-800. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw018. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Gene-based Confirmatory Germline Testing Following Tumor-only Sequencing of Prostate Cancer.基于基因的前列腺癌肿瘤测序后确证性种系检测。
Eur Urol. 2023 Jan;83(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Clinical Utility of Molecular Tumor Board Review for Identification of Possible Germline Pathogenic Variants on Tumor Next-Generation Sequencing Reports.肿瘤下一代测序报告中分子肿瘤委员会审查对可能胚系致病性变异体识别的临床实用性。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep;8:e2400301. doi: 10.1200/PO.24.00301.
6
The detection of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 genetic variants through parallel testing of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a national retrospective audit.通过对高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者进行平行检测,检测种系和体细胞 BRCA1/2 基因突变:一项全国性回顾性审计。
BJOG. 2022 Feb;129(3):433-442. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16975. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
7
Germline BRCA2 variant with low variant allele frequency detected in tumor-only comprehensive genomic profiling.仅在肿瘤组织的全面基因组分析中检测到低频变异等位基因的胚系 BRCA2 变异。
Cancer Sci. 2024 Feb;115(2):682-686. doi: 10.1111/cas.16043. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
8
Feasibility and Clinical Utility of Reporting Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Pathogenic Variants Identified in Research Germline Sequencing: A Prospective Interventional Study.研究性胚系测序中发现的遗传性癌症易感性种系致病性变异的报告的可行性和临床实用性:一项前瞻性干预研究。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Jan;8:e2300266. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00266.
9
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: assessment of point mutations and copy number variations in Brazilian patients.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌:巴西患者点突变和拷贝数变异的评估。
BMC Med Genet. 2014 May 15;15:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-55.
10
Germline Mutations for Novel Candidate Predisposition Genes in Sporadic Schwannomatosis.散发性许旺细胞瘤中新型候选易感性基因的种系突变。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2442-2450. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001239.

引用本文的文献

1
Germline Findings From Tumor-Only Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in the RATIONAL Study: A Missed Opportunity?RATIONAL研究中仅基于肿瘤的综合基因组分析的种系研究结果:一个错失的机会?
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Sep;9:e2500399. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00399. Epub 2025 Sep 10.
2
The usefulness of comprehensive genome profiling test in screening of Lynch syndrome independent of the conventional clinical screening or microsatellite instability tests.综合基因组分析检测在独立于传统临床筛查或微卫星不稳定性检测的林奇综合征筛查中的实用性。
J Hum Genet. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1038/s10038-025-01345-x.
3
Regional Differences in the Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants in Northeastern Japan: A Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Signatures of copy number alterations in human cancer.人类癌症中拷贝数改变的特征。
Nature. 2022 Jun;606(7916):984-991. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04738-6. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
Germline sequencing for presumed germline pathogenic variants via tumor-only comprehensive genomic profiling.通过仅肿瘤的全面基因组分析对疑似胚系致病性变异进行胚系测序。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug;27(8):1256-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02176-y. Epub 2022 May 14.
3
Current status and issues related to secondary findings in the first public insurance covered tumor genomic profiling in Japan: multi-site questionnaire survey.
日本东北部BRCA1和BRCA2基因变异频率的区域差异:一项队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(8):e70443. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70443.
4
Establishment of a comprehensive set of fact sheets for cancer predisposition genes for medical oncologists practicing cancer genome profiling.为从事癌症基因组分析的医学肿瘤学家建立一套关于癌症易感基因的综合情况说明书。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 May;30(5):827-836. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02746-w. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
5
Clinical integration of germline findings from a tumor testing precision medicine program.肿瘤检测精准医学项目中种系结果的临床整合
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13487-4.
6
Specific cancer types and prognosis in patients with variations in the KEAP1-NRF2 system: A retrospective cohort study.KEAP1-NRF2系统变异患者的特定癌症类型及预后:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Sci. 2024 Dec;115(12):4034-4044. doi: 10.1111/cas.16355. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
7
Nationwide survey of the secondary findings in cancer genomic profiling: survey including liquid biopsy.癌症基因组分析中次要发现的全国性调查:包括液体活检的调查
J Hum Genet. 2025 Jan;70(1):33-40. doi: 10.1038/s10038-024-01294-x. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
8
Clinical Utility of Molecular Tumor Board Review for Identification of Possible Germline Pathogenic Variants on Tumor Next-Generation Sequencing Reports.肿瘤下一代测序报告中分子肿瘤委员会审查对可能胚系致病性变异体识别的临床实用性。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep;8:e2400301. doi: 10.1200/PO.24.00301.
日本首次公共保险覆盖的肿瘤基因组分析中二级发现的现状和相关问题:多地点问卷调查。
J Hum Genet. 2022 Oct;67(10):557-563. doi: 10.1038/s10038-022-01028-x. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
4
Germline Testing Data Validate Inferences of Mutational Status for Variants Detected From Tumor-Only Sequencing.胚系检测数据验证了从仅肿瘤测序中检测到的变异体的突变状态推断。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov 17;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00279. eCollection 2021.
5
Physicians' perceptions of the factors influencing disclosure of secondary findings in tumour genomic profiling in Japan: a qualitative study.日本肿瘤基因组分析中二次检测结果披露影响因素的医生认知:一项定性研究
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Jan;30(1):88-94. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00944-4. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
6
ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)关于临床外显子组和基因组测序中次要发现报告的ACMG SF v3.0清单:一项政策声明
Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1381-1390. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01172-3. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
The initial assessment of expert panel performance in core hospitals for cancer genomic medicine in Japan.日本癌症基因组医学核心医院专家组表现的初步评估。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;26(3):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01844-1. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
8
Establishment and implementation of Cancer Genomic Medicine in Japan.日本癌症基因组医学的建立与实施。
Cancer Sci. 2021 Mar;112(3):970-977. doi: 10.1111/cas.14754. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne Liquid CDx, a novel 324-Gene cfDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay for cancers of solid tumor origin.FoundationOne Liquid CDx 的临床和分析验证,一种新型的基于 324 个基因 cfDNA 的用于实体瘤来源的癌症的全面基因组分析检测方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0237802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237802. eCollection 2020.
10
Genetic Counseling and Germline Testing in the Era of Tumor Sequencing: A Cohort Study.肿瘤测序时代的遗传咨询与胚系检测:一项队列研究
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Mar 5;4(3):pkaa018. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa018. eCollection 2020 Jun.