• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大一项关于重度哮喘最佳转诊及合理管理的德尔菲共识研究的建议。

Recommendations from a Canadian Delphi consensus study on best practice for optimal referral and appropriate management of severe asthma.

作者信息

Godbout K, Bhutani M, Connors L, Chan C K N, Connors C, Dorscheid D, Dyck G, Foran V, Kaplan A G, Reynolds J, Waserman S

机构信息

Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Alberta, Western Canada, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023 Feb 17;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00767-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13223-023-00767-6
PMID:36804947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9936462/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Canada, severe asthma affects an estimated 5-10% of people with asthma and is associated with frequent exacerbations, poor symptom control and significant morbidity from the disease itself, as well as the high dose inhaled, and systemic steroids used to treat it. Significant heterogeneity exists in service structure and patient access to severe asthma care, including access to biologic treatments. There appears to be over-reliance on short-acting beta agonists and frequent oral corticosteroid use, two indicators of uncontrolled asthma which can indicate undiagnosed or suboptimally treated severe asthma. The objective of this modified Delphi consensus project was to define standards of care for severe asthma in Canada, in areas where the evidence is lacking through patient and healthcare professional consensus, to complement forthcoming guidelines.

METHODS

The steering group of asthma experts identified 43 statements formed from eight key themes. An online 4-point Likert scale questionnaire was sent to healthcare professionals working in asthma across Canada to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement.

RESULTS

A total of 150 responses were received from HCPs including certified respiratory educators, respirologists, allergists, general practitioners/family physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists. Consensus amongst respondents was very high in 37 (86%) statements, high in 4 (9%) statements and was not achieved in 2 (5%) statements. Based on the consensus scores, ten key recommendations were proposed. These focus on referrals from primary and secondary care, accessing specialist asthma services, homecare provision for severe asthma patients and outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of these recommendations across the severe asthma care pathway in Canada has the potential to improve outcomes for patients through earlier detection of undiagnosed severe asthma, reduction in time to severe asthma diagnosis, and initiation of advanced phenotype specific therapies.

摘要

背景

在加拿大,重度哮喘估计影响5%-10%的哮喘患者,与频繁发作、症状控制不佳以及疾病本身导致的显著发病率相关,同时也与用于治疗的高剂量吸入和全身用类固醇有关。在服务结构和患者获得重度哮喘护理方面存在显著异质性,包括获得生物治疗的机会。似乎过度依赖短效β受体激动剂和频繁使用口服糖皮质激素,这两个未控制哮喘的指标可能表明存在未诊断或治疗不充分的重度哮喘。这个改良的德尔菲共识项目的目的是在证据不足的领域,通过患者和医疗保健专业人员的共识来定义加拿大重度哮喘的护理标准,以补充即将出台的指南。

方法

哮喘专家指导小组确定了由八个关键主题形成的43条陈述。向加拿大各地从事哮喘工作的医疗保健专业人员发送了一份在线4级李克特量表问卷,以评估对这些陈述的认同(共识)。如果≥75%的受访者同意某一陈述,则定义为高共识;如果≥90%的受访者同意某一陈述,则定义为非常高的共识。

结果

共收到150名医疗保健专业人员的回复,包括认证呼吸教育工作者、呼吸科医生、过敏症专科医生、全科医生/家庭医生、护士、药剂师和呼吸治疗师。受访者中,37条(86%)陈述达成了非常高的共识,4条(9%)陈述达成了高共识,2条(5%)陈述未达成共识。根据共识得分,提出了十条关键建议。这些建议侧重于初级和二级护理的转诊、获得专科哮喘服务、为重度哮喘患者提供家庭护理以及结果指标。

结论

在加拿大重度哮喘护理路径中实施这些建议,有可能通过更早发现未诊断的重度哮喘、缩短重度哮喘诊断时间以及启动针对晚期表型的特异性治疗,改善患者的治疗结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05f/9936638/de306b9d2918/13223_2023_767_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05f/9936638/73e1dc20b47f/13223_2023_767_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05f/9936638/158320706912/13223_2023_767_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05f/9936638/de306b9d2918/13223_2023_767_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05f/9936638/73e1dc20b47f/13223_2023_767_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05f/9936638/158320706912/13223_2023_767_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05f/9936638/de306b9d2918/13223_2023_767_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Recommendations from a Canadian Delphi consensus study on best practice for optimal referral and appropriate management of severe asthma.加拿大一项关于重度哮喘最佳转诊及合理管理的德尔菲共识研究的建议。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023 Feb 17;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00767-6.
2
Recommendations following a modified UK-Delphi consensus study on best practice for referral and management of severe asthma.经改良的英国德尔菲共识研究后提出的关于严重哮喘转诊和管理的最佳实践建议。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Sep;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001057.
3
A Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus on Assessing and Managing Cardiopulmonary Risk in Patients with COPD.多学科德尔菲共识:评估和管理 COPD 患者心肺风险。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Sep 19;19:2051-2062. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S471952. eCollection 2024.
4
Twenty-five statements on early initiation of fixed combination ICS/LABA treatment for asthma and COPD in primary and secondary care: consensus research by a modified Delphi process.关于在初级和二级医疗保健中对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)早期启动吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)联合治疗的25条声明:通过改良德尔菲法进行的共识研究
Pneumologie. 2012 Sep;66(9):549-57. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310076. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
5
Clinical Recommendations for the Management of Biological Treatments in Severe Asthma Patients: A Consensus Statement.临床推荐意见:严重哮喘患者生物治疗管理——共识声明。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb 17;31(1):36-43. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0638. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Canadian multidisciplinary expert consensus on the use of biologics in upper airways: a Delphi study.加拿大多学科专家共识:生物制剂在上呼吸道疾病中的应用:德尔菲研究。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Apr 24;52(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40463-023-00626-9.
7
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
8
Global Quality Statements on Reliever Use in Asthma in Adults and Children Older than 5 Years of Age.全球成人和 5 岁以上儿童哮喘缓解药物使用的质量声明
Adv Ther. 2021 Mar;38(3):1382-1396. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01621-0. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
9
Optimizing care for children with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma through specialist paediatric asthma centres: expert practical experience and advice.通过专科儿科哮喘中心优化难治性和严重哮喘儿童的护理:专家实践经验和建议。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04707-0.
10
Spanish multidisciplinary consensus on the characteristics of severe asthma patients on biologic treatment who are candidates for at-home administration.关于适合居家给药的接受生物治疗的重度哮喘患者特征的西班牙多学科共识。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2023 Mar;223(3):154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Path to Diagnosis of Severe Asthma-A Qualitative Exploration.重度哮喘的诊断之路——一项定性探索
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Aug 19;17:3601-3611. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S435347. eCollection 2024.
2
A survey of severe asthma in Canada: results from the CASCADE practice reflective program.加拿大重度哮喘调查:CASCADE实践反思项目的结果
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Apr 18;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00891-x.
3
Optimizing care for children with difficult-to-treat and severe asthma through specialist paediatric asthma centres: expert practical experience and advice.

本文引用的文献

1
SABA use as an indicator for asthma exacerbation risk: an observational cohort study (SABINA Canada).使用短效β2激动剂作为哮喘急性加重风险的指标:一项观察性队列研究(加拿大SABINA研究)
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Sep 26;8(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00140-2022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Clarifying SABA overuse: Translating Canadian Thoracic Society guidelines into clinical practice.澄清短效β2受体激动剂过度使用问题:将加拿大胸科学会指南转化为临床实践
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun 11;18(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13223-022-00690-2.
3
Tezepelumab in Adults and Adolescents with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma.
通过专科儿科哮喘中心优化难治性和严重哮喘儿童的护理:专家实践经验和建议。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04707-0.
4
Real-world outcomes of mepolizumab for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma in Canada: an observational study.美泊利珠单抗治疗加拿大重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的真实世界疗效:一项观察性研究。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Feb 4;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00863-7.
5
Consensus goals and standards for specialist cough clinics: the NEUROCOUGH international Delphi study.专科咳嗽诊所的共识目标和标准:NEUROCOUGH国际德尔菲研究
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Nov 20;9(6). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00618-2023. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Pharmacoequity in Allergy-Immunology: Disparities in Access to Medications for Allergic Diseases and Proposed Solutions in the United States and Globally.过敏与免疫学中的药物公平性:美国及全球过敏性疾病药物获取方面的差异与建议解决方案
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Feb;12(2):272-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
特泽布尔单抗在成人和青少年重症、未控制哮喘中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1800-1809. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034975.
4
Characterisation of patients with severe asthma in the UK Severe Asthma Registry in the biologic era.在生物制剂时代的英国严重哮喘注册研究中对严重哮喘患者的特征描述。
Thorax. 2021 Mar;76(3):220-227. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215168. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
5
Economic burden of multimorbidity in patients with severe asthma: a 20-year population-based study.严重哮喘患者多病共存的经济负担:一项长达 20 年的基于人群的研究。
Thorax. 2019 Dec;74(12):1113-1119. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213223. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
6
Over- and under-diagnosis in asthma.哮喘的过度诊断与漏诊
Breathe (Sheff). 2019 Mar;15(1):e20-e27. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0362-2018.
7
A multi-stakeholder perspective on asthma care in Canada: findings from a mixed methods needs assessment in the treatment and management of asthma in adults.加拿大哮喘护理的多利益相关者视角:成人哮喘治疗与管理中混合方法需求评估的结果
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Sep 10;14:36. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0261-x. eCollection 2018.
8
Understanding Asthma Phenotypes, Endotypes, and Mechanisms of Disease.理解哮喘表型、内型和疾病机制。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019 Apr;56(2):219-233. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8712-1.
9
Severe, eosinophilic asthma in primary care in Canada: a longitudinal study of the clinical burden and economic impact based on linked electronic medical record data.加拿大基层医疗中的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘:基于关联电子病历数据的临床负担和经济影响的纵向研究
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Apr 24;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0241-1. eCollection 2018.
10
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.定义共识:系统评价为 Delphi 研究报告推荐了方法学标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.