Ding Zi-Niu, Meng Guang-Xiao, Xue Jun-Shuai, Liu Hui, Yang Long-Shan, Li Rui-Zhe, Mao Xin-Cheng, Yan Yu-Chuan, Wang Dong-Xu, Dong Zhao-Ru, Li Tao
Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023 Apr;184:103940. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103940. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
We aim to identify the optimal treatment option of systemic therapy with or without locoregional therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Outcomes of interest include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and incidence of treatment discontinuation due to AEs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values were applied to rank the interventions. 23 randomized-controlled trials including 14,303 patients with advanced HCC were included. Lenvatinib plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) ranked best regarding OS benefit (SUCRA: 0.99). Immuno-oncology (IO)-multikinase inhibitor (MKI)/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor combinations had a higher probability of providing better OS than IO-IO combinations. IO monotherapies demonstrated superior safety profile while combination therapies caused more toxicity in general. We conclude that combination therapies achieve remarkable efficacy in patients with advanced HCC and clinical decision making requires a careful balance of efficacy versus risk.
我们旨在确定晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)全身治疗联合或不联合局部区域治疗的最佳治疗方案。感兴趣的结果包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、3-4级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)以及因不良事件导致治疗中断的发生率。应用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)概率值对干预措施进行排序。纳入了23项随机对照试验,共14303例晚期HCC患者。就OS获益而言,乐伐替尼联合经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)排名最佳(SUCRA:0.99)。免疫肿瘤学(IO)-多激酶抑制剂(MKI)/血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂联合使用比IO-IO联合使用更有可能提供更好的OS。IO单药治疗显示出更好的安全性,而联合治疗总体上毒性更大。我们得出结论,联合治疗在晚期HCC患者中取得了显著疗效,临床决策需要在疗效与风险之间仔细权衡。